Thompson Sampling Itself is Differentially Private
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The provided paper examines the differential privacy properties of Thompson Sampling, a popular algorithm for online learning and decision-making.
- The paper shows that Thompson Sampling itself is differentially private, without requiring any additional privacy-preserving mechanisms.
- This has important implications for the widespread use of Thompson Sampling in real-world applications where privacy is a concern.
Plain English Explanation
Thompson Sampling is a widely used algorithm in machine learning and decision-making. It helps systems make choices by balancing exploration (trying new options) and exploitation (using the best option so far).
The key insight of this paper is that Thompson Sampling is inherently private. This means the algorithm can protect the privacy of the data used to make decisions, without requiring any additional privacy-preserving techniques.
Differential privacy is an important concept in data privacy. It ensures that the output of an algorithm doesn't reveal too much about any individual piece of input data. The paper shows that Thompson Sampling satisfies the requirements of differential privacy on its own.
This is significant because many real-world applications of machine learning, like healthcare or finance, need to protect sensitive user data. Thompson Sampling can now be used in these privacy-critical domains without compromising the privacy of the underlying data.
Technical Explanation
The paper provides a formal analysis of the differential privacy properties of Thompson Sampling. It shows that Thompson Sampling satisfies (ε,δ)-differential privacy, a standard definition of differential privacy, without any additional privacy-preserving mechanisms.
The key steps in the technical analysis are:
- Defining the Thompson Sampling algorithm and its update process in a multi-armed bandit setting.
- Proving that the posterior distribution of the parameters in Thompson Sampling satisfies the differential privacy requirements.
- Bounding the privacy loss (ε and δ parameters) of Thompson Sampling as a function of the problem parameters.
The technical results demonstrate that Thompson Sampling can be used in a wide range of applications without compromising the privacy of the underlying data.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of the differential privacy properties of Thompson Sampling. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
- Empirical Validation: While the theoretical analysis is sound, it would be valuable to validate the privacy guarantees of Thompson Sampling through empirical studies on real-world datasets and applications.
- Extensions to Other Settings: The analysis in the paper is focused on the multi-armed bandit setting. It would be interesting to see if the differential privacy properties of Thompson Sampling extend to other decision-making scenarios, such as contextual bandits or reinforcement learning.
- Practical Implementation Considerations: The paper does not address the practical challenges of implementing differentially private Thompson Sampling, such as dealing with numerical stability issues or managing the privacy-utility tradeoff.
Overall, this paper makes an important contribution by establishing the inherent differential privacy properties of Thompson Sampling, which can have significant implications for the widespread adoption of this algorithm in privacy-sensitive applications.
Conclusion
This paper shows that Thompson Sampling is differentially private, without requiring any additional privacy-preserving mechanisms. This is a significant finding, as it means Thompson Sampling can be used in a wide range of applications where data privacy is a critical concern, such as healthcare, finance, and personalized recommendations.
The theoretical analysis in the paper provides a solid foundation for further research and practical implementation of differentially private Thompson Sampling. While there are some potential limitations and areas for future work, this research represents an important step towards developing privacy-preserving machine learning algorithms that can be deployed in real-world, sensitive domains.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Thompson Sampling Itself is Differentially Private
Tingting Ou, Marco Avella Medina, Rachel Cummings
In this work we first show that the classical Thompson sampling algorithm for multi-arm bandits is differentially private as-is, without any modification. We provide per-round privacy guarantees as a function of problem parameters and show composition over $T$ rounds; since the algorithm is unchanged, existing $O(sqrt{NTlog N})$ regret bounds still hold and there is no loss in performance due to privacy. We then show that simple modifications -- such as pre-pulling all arms a fixed number of times, increasing the sampling variance -- can provide tighter privacy guarantees. We again provide privacy guarantees that now depend on the new parameters introduced in the modification, which allows the analyst to tune the privacy guarantee as desired. We also provide a novel regret analysis for this new algorithm, and show how the new parameters also impact expected regret. Finally, we empirically validate and illustrate our theoretical findings in two parameter regimes and demonstrate that tuning the new parameters substantially improve the privacy-regret tradeoff.
Read more7/23/2024
0
Efficient and Adaptive Posterior Sampling Algorithms for Bandits
Bingshan Hu, Zhiming Huang, Tianyue H. Zhang, Mathias L'ecuyer, Nidhi Hegde
We study Thompson Sampling-based algorithms for stochastic bandits with bounded rewards. As the existing problem-dependent regret bound for Thompson Sampling with Gaussian priors [Agrawal and Goyal, 2017] is vacuous when $T le 288 e^{64}$, we derive a more practical bound that tightens the coefficient of the leading term %from $288 e^{64}$ to $1270$. Additionally, motivated by large-scale real-world applications that require scalability, adaptive computational resource allocation, and a balance in utility and computation, we propose two parameterized Thompson Sampling-based algorithms: Thompson Sampling with Model Aggregation (TS-MA-$alpha$) and Thompson Sampling with Timestamp Duelling (TS-TD-$alpha$), where $alpha in [0,1]$ controls the trade-off between utility and computation. Both algorithms achieve $O left(Kln^{alpha+1}(T)/Delta right)$ regret bound, where $K$ is the number of arms, $T$ is the finite learning horizon, and $Delta$ denotes the single round performance loss when pulling a sub-optimal arm.
Read more5/3/2024
✨
0
Near-Optimal Algorithms for Differentially Private Online Learning in a Stochastic Environment
Bingshan Hu, Zhiming Huang, Nishant A. Mehta, Nidhi Hegde
In this paper, we study differentially private online learning problems in a stochastic environment under both bandit and full information feedback. For differentially private stochastic bandits, we propose both UCB and Thompson Sampling-based algorithms that are anytime and achieve the optimal $O left(sum_{j: Delta_j>0} frac{ln(T)}{min left{Delta_j, epsilon right}} right)$ instance-dependent regret bound, where $T$ is the finite learning horizon, $Delta_j$ denotes the suboptimality gap between the optimal arm and a suboptimal arm $j$, and $epsilon$ is the required privacy parameter. For the differentially private full information setting with stochastic rewards, we show an $Omega left(frac{ln(K)}{min left{Delta_{min}, epsilon right}} right)$ instance-dependent regret lower bound and an $Omegaleft(sqrt{Tln(K)} + frac{ln(K)}{epsilon}right)$ minimax lower bound, where $K$ is the total number of actions and $Delta_{min}$ denotes the minimum suboptimality gap among all the suboptimal actions. For the same differentially private full information setting, we also present an $epsilon$-differentially private algorithm whose instance-dependent regret and worst-case regret match our respective lower bounds up to an extra $log(T)$ factor.
Read more5/31/2024
🛠️
0
Thompson Sampling for Infinite-Horizon Discounted Decision Processes
Daniel Adelman, Cagla Keceli, Alba V. Olivares-Nadal
We model a Markov decision process, parametrized by an unknown parameter, and study the asymptotic behavior of a sampling-based algorithm, called Thompson sampling. The standard definition of regret is not always suitable to evaluate a policy, especially when the underlying chain structure is general. We show that the standard (expected) regret can grow (super-)linearly and fails to capture the notion of learning in realistic settings with non-trivial state evolution. By decomposing the standard (expected) regret, we develop a new metric, called the expected residual regret, which forgets the immutable consequences of past actions. Instead, it measures regret against the optimal reward moving forward from the current period. We show that the expected residual regret of the Thompson sampling algorithm is upper bounded by a term which converges exponentially fast to 0. We present conditions under which the posterior sampling error of Thompson sampling converges to 0 almost surely. We then introduce the probabilistic version of the expected residual regret and present conditions under which it converges to 0 almost surely. Thus, we provide a viable concept of learning for sampling algorithms which will serve useful in broader settings than had been considered previously.
Read more5/20/2024