TLCR: Token-Level Continuous Reward for Fine-grained Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

Read original: arXiv:2407.16574 - Published 7/24/2024 by Eunseop Yoon, Hee Suk Yoon, SooHwan Eom, Gunsoo Han, Daniel Wontae Nam, Daejin Jo, Kyoung-Woon On, Mark A. Hasegawa-Johnson, Sungwoong Kim, Chang D. Yoo
Total Score

0

TLCR: Token-Level Continuous Reward for Fine-grained Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper introduces a new method called TLCR (Token-Level Continuous Reward) for fine-grained reinforcement learning from human feedback.
  • TLCR provides a continuous reward signal at the token level, which allows the model to learn more nuanced and granular behavior compared to coarse-grained rewards.
  • The authors show that TLCR outperforms previous approaches on various language generation tasks, including summarization, dialogue, and essay writing.

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a new technique called TLCR (Token-Level Continuous Reward) that aims to improve how AI models learn from human feedback. Typically, AI models receive a single reward or score at the end of a task, like generating a summary or writing an essay. With TLCR, the model gets a continuous stream of rewards for each individual word it generates, allowing it to fine-tune its behavior in a more granular way.

The key idea is that humans can provide more nuanced feedback at the word level, not just an overall score. For example, they might like certain parts of the generated text but dislike others. By capturing this detailed feedback, the TLCR approach enables the AI model to learn more refined and contextual behavior, leading to better performance on language generation tasks compared to previous methods.

The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of TLCR through experiments on summarization, dialogue, and essay writing. The results show that TLCR outperforms other reinforcement learning techniques that rely on coarser, less informative reward signals.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a new reinforcement learning approach called TLCR, which stands for Token-Level Continuous Reward. In traditional reinforcement learning from human feedback, the AI model receives a single reward or score at the end of a task, such as generating a summary or an essay.

In contrast, TLCR provides a continuous reward signal at the token (word) level, allowing the model to learn more fine-grained and nuanced behavior. The authors argue that this token-level feedback enables the model to better understand which parts of the generated text are preferred by the human and adapt its behavior accordingly.

The TLCR architecture consists of a language model that generates the text, and a reward predictor model that estimates the continuous reward for each generated token based on human feedback. The authors train the language model and reward predictor jointly using reinforcement learning, where the reward predictor provides the token-level rewards to guide the learning of the language model.

The experimental results demonstrate that TLCR outperforms previous reinforcement learning approaches that rely on coarser, less informative reward signals. The authors evaluate TLCR on various language generation tasks, including summarization, dialogue, and essay writing, showing consistent improvements over the baselines.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a compelling case for the benefits of TLCR, a novel reinforcement learning approach that leverages fine-grained, token-level feedback from humans. By providing a continuous reward signal at the word level, TLCR enables AI models to learn more nuanced and contextual behavior, leading to better performance on language generation tasks.

One potential limitation of the TLCR approach is the reliance on human feedback, which can be subjective and time-consuming to obtain at scale. The authors acknowledge this challenge and suggest exploring ways to collect more efficient and scalable human feedback, such as through crowdsourcing or active learning techniques.

Additionally, the paper could have delved deeper into the potential limitations of TLCR, such as the possibility of overfitting to the provided feedback or the potential for human biases to be amplified in the model's behavior. Addressing these concerns in future research could further strengthen the TLCR approach.

Overall, the paper presents a promising direction for reinforcement learning from human feedback, offering a novel solution to the problem of coarse-grained rewards. The TLCR method demonstrates the value of fine-grained, token-level feedback and opens up new avenues for improving the capabilities of language models in various applications.

Conclusion

The TLCR (Token-Level Continuous Reward) approach introduced in this paper represents a significant advancement in reinforcement learning from human feedback for language generation tasks. By providing a continuous reward signal at the token level, TLCR enables AI models to learn more nuanced and contextual behavior, leading to improved performance on summarization, dialogue, and essay writing compared to previous methods.

The key innovation of TLCR is its ability to capture detailed human feedback at the word level, allowing the model to fine-tune its behavior in a more granular way. This fine-grained learning mechanism has the potential to enhance the capabilities of language models in a wide range of applications, from content generation to interactive dialogue systems.

While the paper acknowledges challenges related to scaling human feedback, the TLCR approach demonstrates the value of incorporating more granular and informative reward signals into reinforcement learning. As the field of AI continues to evolve, techniques like TLCR that leverage human input in novel ways will likely play an increasingly important role in developing advanced language models that can better understand and respond to human preferences.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

TLCR: Token-Level Continuous Reward for Fine-grained Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
Total Score

0

TLCR: Token-Level Continuous Reward for Fine-grained Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

Eunseop Yoon, Hee Suk Yoon, SooHwan Eom, Gunsoo Han, Daniel Wontae Nam, Daejin Jo, Kyoung-Woon On, Mark A. Hasegawa-Johnson, Sungwoong Kim, Chang D. Yoo

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) leverages human preference data to train language models to align more closely with human essence. These human preference data, however, are labeled at the sequence level, creating a mismatch between sequence-level preference labels and tokens, which are autoregressively generated from the language model. Although several recent approaches have tried to provide token-level (i.e., dense) rewards for each individual token, these typically rely on predefined discrete reward values (e.g., positive: +1, negative: -1, neutral: 0), failing to account for varying degrees of preference inherent to each token. To address this limitation, we introduce TLCR (Token-Level Continuous Reward) for RLHF, which incorporates a discriminator trained to distinguish positive and negative tokens, and the confidence of the discriminator is used to assign continuous rewards to each token considering the context. Extensive experiments show that our proposed TLCR leads to consistent performance improvements over previous sequence-level or token-level discrete rewards on open-ended generation benchmarks.

Read more

7/24/2024

RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMs
Total Score

0

RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMs

Shreyas Chaudhari, Pranjal Aggarwal, Vishvak Murahari, Tanmay Rajpurohit, Ashwin Kalyan, Karthik Narasimhan, Ameet Deshpande, Bruno Castro da Silva

State-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) have become indispensable tools for various tasks. However, training LLMs to serve as effective assistants for humans requires careful consideration. A promising approach is reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), which leverages human feedback to update the model in accordance with human preferences and mitigate issues like toxicity and hallucinations. Yet, an understanding of RLHF for LLMs is largely entangled with initial design choices that popularized the method and current research focuses on augmenting those choices rather than fundamentally improving the framework. In this paper, we analyze RLHF through the lens of reinforcement learning principles to develop an understanding of its fundamentals, dedicating substantial focus to the core component of RLHF -- the reward model. Our study investigates modeling choices, caveats of function approximation, and their implications on RLHF training algorithms, highlighting the underlying assumptions made about the expressivity of reward. Our analysis improves the understanding of the role of reward models and methods for their training, concurrently revealing limitations of the current methodology. We characterize these limitations, including incorrect generalization, model misspecification, and the sparsity of feedback, along with their impact on the performance of a language model. The discussion and analysis are substantiated by a categorical review of current literature, serving as a reference for researchers and practitioners to understand the challenges of RLHF and build upon existing efforts.

Read more

4/17/2024

🏅

Total Score

0

Multi-turn Reinforcement Learning from Preference Human Feedback

Lior Shani, Aviv Rosenberg, Asaf Cassel, Oran Lang, Daniele Calandriello, Avital Zipori, Hila Noga, Orgad Keller, Bilal Piot, Idan Szpektor, Avinatan Hassidim, Yossi Matias, R'emi Munos

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has become the standard approach for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences, allowing LLMs to demonstrate remarkable abilities in various tasks. Existing methods work by emulating the preferences at the single decision (turn) level, limiting their capabilities in settings that require planning or multi-turn interactions to achieve a long-term goal. In this paper, we address this issue by developing novel methods for Reinforcement Learning (RL) from preference feedback between two full multi-turn conversations. In the tabular setting, we present a novel mirror-descent-based policy optimization algorithm for the general multi-turn preference-based RL problem, and prove its convergence to Nash equilibrium. To evaluate performance, we create a new environment, Education Dialogue, where a teacher agent guides a student in learning a random topic, and show that a deep RL variant of our algorithm outperforms RLHF baselines. Finally, we show that in an environment with explicit rewards, our algorithm recovers the same performance as a reward-based RL baseline, despite relying solely on a weaker preference signal.

Read more

5/24/2024

Enhancing Reinforcement Learning with Label-Sensitive Reward for Natural Language Understanding
Total Score

0

Enhancing Reinforcement Learning with Label-Sensitive Reward for Natural Language Understanding

Kuo Liao, Shuang Li, Meng Zhao, Liqun Liu, Mengge Xue, Zhenyu Hu, Honglin Han, Chengguo Yin

Recent strides in large language models (LLMs) have yielded remarkable performance, leveraging reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) to significantly enhance generation and alignment capabilities. However, RLHF encounters numerous challenges, including the objective mismatch issue, leading to suboptimal performance in Natural Language Understanding (NLU) tasks. To address this limitation, we propose a novel Reinforcement Learning framework enhanced with Label-sensitive Reward (RLLR) to amplify the performance of LLMs in NLU tasks. By incorporating label-sensitive pairs into reinforcement learning, our method aims to adeptly capture nuanced label-sensitive semantic features during RL, thereby enhancing natural language understanding. Experiments conducted on five diverse foundation models across eight tasks showcase promising results. In comparison to Supervised Fine-tuning models (SFT), RLLR demonstrates an average performance improvement of 1.54%. Compared with RLHF models, the improvement averages at 0.69%. These results reveal the effectiveness of our method for LLMs in NLU tasks. Code and data available at: https://github.com/MagiaSN/ACL2024_RLLR.

Read more

5/31/2024