Towards Better Understanding of In-Context Learning Ability from In-Context Uncertainty Quantification
2405.15115
0
0
Abstract
Predicting simple function classes has been widely used as a testbed for developing theory and understanding of the trained Transformer's in-context learning (ICL) ability. In this paper, we revisit the training of Transformers on linear regression tasks, and different from all the existing literature, we consider a bi-objective prediction task of predicting both the conditional expectation $mathbb{E}[Y|X]$ and the conditional variance Var$(Y|X)$. This additional uncertainty quantification objective provides a handle to (i) better design out-of-distribution experiments to distinguish ICL from in-weight learning (IWL) and (ii) make a better separation between the algorithms with and without using the prior information of the training distribution. Theoretically, we show that the trained Transformer reaches near Bayes-optimum, suggesting the usage of the information of the training distribution. Our method can be extended to other cases. Specifically, with the Transformer's context window $S$, we prove a generalization bound of $tilde{mathcal{O}}(sqrt{min{S, T}/(n T)})$ on $n$ tasks with sequences of length $T$, providing sharper analysis compared to previous results of $tilde{mathcal{O}}(sqrt{1/n})$. Empirically, we illustrate that while the trained Transformer behaves as the Bayes-optimal solution as a natural consequence of supervised training in distribution, it does not necessarily perform a Bayesian inference when facing task shifts, in contrast to the textit{equivalence} between these two proposed in many existing literature. We also demonstrate the trained Transformer's ICL ability over covariates shift and prompt-length shift and interpret them as a generalization over a meta distribution.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores in-context learning ability and uncertainty quantification in large language models.
- The authors investigate how well language models can learn new tasks from a few examples provided in the input context.
- They propose a method to quantify the uncertainty of in-context learning performance, which can provide insights into the model's learning capabilities.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models like GPT-3 have shown impressive abilities to learn new tasks by simply observing a few examples provided in the input context. This process, known as in-context learning, allows these models to quickly adapt to new scenarios without extensive fine-tuning.
However, it can be difficult to understand the limits and capabilities of in-context learning. This paper introduces a way to quantify the uncertainty around a model's in-context learning performance. By measuring the model's confidence in its own predictions, researchers can gain insights into how well the model is able to learn from the provided examples.
The authors explore different factors that may influence in-context learning, such as the number of training examples, the quality of the training data, and the complexity of the task. By understanding these relationships, they aim to shed light on the underlying mechanisms of in-context learning and how it can be improved.
This research could have important implications for the development of more capable and reliable AI systems that can quickly adapt to new situations without extensive retraining.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a framework to quantify the uncertainty of in-context learning performance in large language models. The authors hypothesize that by measuring the model's confidence in its own predictions, they can gain insights into the model's in-context learning capabilities.
To test this, they design a series of experiments where language models are presented with a few examples of a new task (e.g., text classification, question answering) in the input context. The models are then asked to perform the task on held-out test examples. By analyzing the model's output probabilities, the researchers can estimate the uncertainty associated with the model's in-context learning performance.
The experiments explore how factors such as the number of training examples, the quality of the training data, and the complexity of the task affect the model's in-context learning ability and the associated uncertainty. The authors also investigate how multi-task training can impact in-context learning performance.
Through their analysis, the researchers gain a better understanding of the factors that influence in-context learning and the potential limitations of this approach. They discuss how this uncertainty quantification framework can be used to guide the development of more robust and reliable in-context learning systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and promising approach to understanding the in-context learning abilities of large language models. By quantifying the uncertainty associated with the model's predictions, the authors provide a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners to better evaluate the capabilities and limitations of these models.
One potential limitation of the research is the use of a relatively small number of tasks and datasets. While the authors explore several factors that may influence in-context learning, it would be valuable to see a more comprehensive analysis across a wider range of tasks and datasets to further validate the generalizability of the findings.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the underlying mechanisms that drive in-context learning. While the uncertainty quantification framework can provide insights into the model's performance, a more detailed investigation into the architectural and training-related factors that enable or hinder in-context learning could lead to important advancements in the field.
Finally, the authors acknowledge that their approach relies on the assumption that the model's output probabilities accurately reflect its uncertainty. It would be valuable to explore alternative methods for quantifying uncertainty, such as Bayesian approaches or ensemble techniques, to further validate the findings and potentially uncover additional insights.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel framework for quantifying the uncertainty associated with in-context learning in large language models. By measuring the model's confidence in its own predictions, the authors are able to gain valuable insights into the factors that influence this powerful learning capability.
The research has important implications for the development of more reliable and adaptable AI systems that can quickly learn new tasks from limited examples. The uncertainty quantification approach introduced in this paper could serve as a valuable tool for both researchers and practitioners working to push the boundaries of in-context learning.
While the paper raises some interesting questions and avenues for further exploration, the core insights it provides represent an important step forward in our understanding of this emerging area of AI research.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📊
In-Context Learning through the Bayesian Prism
Madhur Panwar, Kabir Ahuja, Navin Goyal
0
0
In-context learning (ICL) is one of the surprising and useful features of large language models and subject of intense research. Recently, stylized meta-learning-like ICL setups have been devised that train transformers on sequences of input-output pairs $(x, f(x))$. The function $f$ comes from a function class and generalization is checked by evaluating on sequences generated from unseen functions from the same class. One of the main discoveries in this line of research has been that for several function classes, such as linear regression, transformers successfully generalize to new functions in the class. However, the inductive biases of these models resulting in this behavior are not clearly understood. A model with unlimited training data and compute is a Bayesian predictor: it learns the pretraining distribution. In this paper we empirically examine how far this Bayesian perspective can help us understand ICL. To this end, we generalize the previous meta-ICL setup to hierarchical meta-ICL setup which involve unions of multiple task families. We instantiate this setup on a diverse range of linear and nonlinear function families and find that transformers can do ICL in this setting as well. Where Bayesian inference is tractable, we find evidence that high-capacity transformers mimic the Bayesian predictor. The Bayesian perspective provides insights into the inductive bias of ICL and how transformers perform a particular task when they are trained on multiple tasks. We also find that transformers can learn to generalize to new function classes that were not seen during pretraining. This involves deviation from the Bayesian predictor. We examine these deviations in more depth offering new insights and hypotheses.
4/16/2024
Asymptotic theory of in-context learning by linear attention
Yue M. Lu, Mary I. Letey, Jacob A. Zavatone-Veth, Anindita Maiti, Cengiz Pehlevan
0
0
Transformers have a remarkable ability to learn and execute tasks based on examples provided within the input itself, without explicit prior training. It has been argued that this capability, known as in-context learning (ICL), is a cornerstone of Transformers' success, yet questions about the necessary sample complexity, pretraining task diversity, and context length for successful ICL remain unresolved. Here, we provide a precise answer to these questions in an exactly solvable model of ICL of a linear regression task by linear attention. We derive sharp asymptotics for the learning curve in a phenomenologically-rich scaling regime where the token dimension is taken to infinity; the context length and pretraining task diversity scale proportionally with the token dimension; and the number of pretraining examples scales quadratically. We demonstrate a double-descent learning curve with increasing pretraining examples, and uncover a phase transition in the model's behavior between low and high task diversity regimes: In the low diversity regime, the model tends toward memorization of training tasks, whereas in the high diversity regime, it achieves genuine in-context learning and generalization beyond the scope of pretrained tasks. These theoretical insights are empirically validated through experiments with both linear attention and full nonlinear Transformer architectures.
5/21/2024
Does learning the right latent variables necessarily improve in-context learning?
Sarthak Mittal, Eric Elmoznino, Leo Gagnon, Sangnie Bhardwaj, Dhanya Sridhar, Guillaume Lajoie
0
0
Large autoregressive models like Transformers can solve tasks through in-context learning (ICL) without learning new weights, suggesting avenues for efficiently solving new tasks. For many tasks, e.g., linear regression, the data factorizes: examples are independent given a task latent that generates the data, e.g., linear coefficients. While an optimal predictor leverages this factorization by inferring task latents, it is unclear if Transformers implicitly do so or if they instead exploit heuristics and statistical shortcuts enabled by attention layers. Both scenarios have inspired active ongoing work. In this paper, we systematically investigate the effect of explicitly inferring task latents. We minimally modify the Transformer architecture with a bottleneck designed to prevent shortcuts in favor of more structured solutions, and then compare performance against standard Transformers across various ICL tasks. Contrary to intuition and some recent works, we find little discernible difference between the two; biasing towards task-relevant latent variables does not lead to better out-of-distribution performance, in general. Curiously, we find that while the bottleneck effectively learns to extract latent task variables from context, downstream processing struggles to utilize them for robust prediction. Our study highlights the intrinsic limitations of Transformers in achieving structured ICL solutions that generalize, and shows that while inferring the right latents aids interpretability, it is not sufficient to alleviate this problem.
5/30/2024
📉
How Do Nonlinear Transformers Learn and Generalize in In-Context Learning?
Hongkang Li, Meng Wang, Songtao Lu, Xiaodong Cui, Pin-Yu Chen
0
0
Transformer-based large language models have displayed impressive in-context learning capabilities, where a pre-trained model can handle new tasks without fine-tuning by simply augmenting the query with some input-output examples from that task. Despite the empirical success, the mechanics of how to train a Transformer to achieve ICL and the corresponding ICL capacity is mostly elusive due to the technical challenges of analyzing the nonconvex training problems resulting from the nonlinear self-attention and nonlinear activation in Transformers. To the best of our knowledge, this paper provides the first theoretical analysis of the training dynamics of Transformers with nonlinear self-attention and nonlinear MLP, together with the ICL generalization capability of the resulting model. Focusing on a group of binary classification tasks, we train Transformers using data from a subset of these tasks and quantify the impact of various factors on the ICL generalization performance on the remaining unseen tasks with and without data distribution shifts. We also analyze how different components in the learned Transformers contribute to the ICL performance. Furthermore, we provide the first theoretical analysis of how model pruning affects ICL performance and prove that proper magnitude-based pruning can have a minimal impact on ICL while reducing inference costs. These theoretical findings are justified through numerical experiments.
6/18/2024