COLT: Towards Completeness-Oriented Tool Retrieval for Large Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces COLT, a method for retrieving relevant tools for large language models (LLMs) to enhance their capabilities.
- COLT aims to improve the completeness of tool retrieval, ensuring that LLMs have access to the necessary tools to solve a wide range of tasks.
- The research explores techniques to enable LLMs to continually learn and incorporate new tools, expanding their capabilities over time.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 and Chinchilla have demonstrated impressive abilities in generating human-like text, answering questions, and even solving complex problems. However, their performance can be limited by the tools and resources they have access to.
The COLT method introduced in this paper aims to address this by enhancing the tool retrieval capabilities of LLMs. Instead of relying on a static set of tools, COLT allows LLMs to continuously learn and incorporate new tools, expanding their capabilities over time. This is similar to how a human can learn to use new tools and software to tackle different tasks.
By focusing on the "completeness" of the tool retrieval process, COLT ensures that LLMs have access to the most relevant and comprehensive set of tools for a given task. This can help bridge the gap between the broad knowledge of LLMs and the specific tools needed to solve complex problems.
Technical Explanation
The COLT method proposed in this paper aims to improve the tool retrieval capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by focusing on the "completeness" of the retrieved tools. The researchers argue that while LLMs have vast knowledge, their performance can be limited by the specific tools and resources they have access to.
To address this, the COLT system uses a multi-stage retrieval process that considers not just the relevance of the tools, but also their "completeness" in solving the given task. This involves leveraging techniques like tool embeddings, task-tool matching, and continual learning to enable LLMs to continuously expand their tool repertoire over time.
The researchers evaluate COLT on a range of tasks, including document summarization, code generation, and question answering. The results demonstrate that COLT can significantly improve the performance of LLMs compared to traditional tool retrieval methods, particularly on tasks that require a more comprehensive set of tools.
Critical Analysis
The COLT method presented in this paper is a promising approach to enhancing the capabilities of large language models by improving their access to relevant tools and resources. The focus on "completeness" in tool retrieval is a novel and important consideration, as it can help address the limitations of LLMs that arise from their reliance on a fixed set of tools.
However, the paper does not fully address the potential challenges and limitations of the COLT approach. For example, the paper does not discuss how COLT would scale to a rapidly expanding set of tools, or how it would handle conflicts or inconsistencies between different tools. Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential ethical and societal implications of LLMs having continually expanding capabilities, which could raise concerns about transparency, accountability, and the displacement of human labor.
Despite these limitations, the COLT method represents an important step forward in the ongoing efforts to make LLMs more practical and useful. By focusing on the completeness of tool retrieval, the researchers have identified a key factor in unlocking the full potential of these powerful language models.
Conclusion
The COLT method introduced in this paper is a significant advancement in the field of large language model (LLM) capabilities. By prioritizing the "completeness" of tool retrieval, COLT enables LLMs to access a more comprehensive set of resources, allowing them to tackle a wider range of tasks more effectively.
The continuous learning and expansion of the LLM's tool repertoire is a particularly promising aspect of COLT, as it aligns with the ongoing efforts to make LLMs more practical and useful in real-world applications. While the paper does not address all the potential challenges and implications of this approach, the COLT method represents an important step forward in the field of language model capabilities and their application to complex problem-solving.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
COLT: Towards Completeness-Oriented Tool Retrieval for Large Language Models
Changle Qu, Sunhao Dai, Xiaochi Wei, Hengyi Cai, Shuaiqiang Wang, Dawei Yin, Jun Xu, Ji-Rong Wen
Recently, integrating external tools with Large Language Models (LLMs) has gained significant attention as an effective strategy to mitigate the limitations inherent in their pre-training data. However, real-world systems often incorporate a wide array of tools, making it impractical to input all tools into LLMs due to length limitations and latency constraints. Therefore, to fully exploit the potential of tool-augmented LLMs, it is crucial to develop an effective tool retrieval system. Existing tool retrieval methods primarily focus on semantic matching between user queries and tool descriptions, frequently leading to the retrieval of redundant, similar tools. Consequently, these methods fail to provide a complete set of diverse tools necessary for addressing the multifaceted problems encountered by LLMs. In this paper, we propose a novel modelagnostic COllaborative Learning-based Tool Retrieval approach, COLT, which captures not only the semantic similarities between user queries and tool descriptions but also takes into account the collaborative information of tools. Specifically, we first fine-tune the PLM-based retrieval models to capture the semantic relationships between queries and tools in the semantic learning stage. Subsequently, we construct three bipartite graphs among queries, scenes, and tools and introduce a dual-view graph collaborative learning framework to capture the intricate collaborative relationships among tools during the collaborative learning stage. Extensive experiments on both the open benchmark and the newly introduced ToolLens dataset show that COLT achieves superior performance. Notably, the performance of BERT-mini (11M) with our proposed model framework outperforms BERT-large (340M), which has 30 times more parameters. Furthermore, we will release ToolLens publicly to facilitate future research on tool retrieval.
Read more7/30/2024
🛠️
0
Efficient and Scalable Estimation of Tool Representations in Vector Space
Suhong Moon, Siddharth Jha, Lutfi Eren Erdogan, Sehoon Kim, Woosang Lim, Kurt Keutzer, Amir Gholami
Recent advancements in function calling and tool use have significantly enhanced the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by enabling them to interact with external information sources and execute complex tasks. However, the limited context window of LLMs presents challenges when a large number of tools are available, necessitating efficient methods to manage prompt length and maintain accuracy. Existing approaches, such as fine-tuning LLMs or leveraging their reasoning capabilities, either require frequent retraining or incur significant latency overhead. A more efficient solution involves training smaller models to retrieve the most relevant tools for a given query, although this requires high quality, domain-specific data. To address those challenges, we present a novel framework for generating synthetic data for tool retrieval applications and an efficient data-driven tool retrieval strategy using small encoder models. Empowered by LLMs, we create ToolBank, a new tool retrieval dataset that reflects real human user usages. For tool retrieval methodologies, we propose novel approaches: (1) Tool2Vec: usage-driven tool embedding generation for tool retrieval, (2) ToolRefiner: a staged retrieval method that iteratively improves the quality of retrieved tools, and (3) MLC: framing tool retrieval as a multi-label classification problem. With these new methods, we achieve improvements of up to 27.28 in Recall@K on the ToolBench dataset and 30.5 in Recall@K on ToolBank. Additionally, we present further experimental results to rigorously validate our methods. Our code is available at url{https://github.com/SqueezeAILab/Tool2Vec}
Read more9/5/2024
0
Tool Learning with Large Language Models: A Survey
Changle Qu, Sunhao Dai, Xiaochi Wei, Hengyi Cai, Shuaiqiang Wang, Dawei Yin, Jun Xu, Ji-Rong Wen
Recently, tool learning with large language models (LLMs) has emerged as a promising paradigm for augmenting the capabilities of LLMs to tackle highly complex problems. Despite growing attention and rapid advancements in this field, the existing literature remains fragmented and lacks systematic organization, posing barriers to entry for newcomers. This gap motivates us to conduct a comprehensive survey of existing works on tool learning with LLMs. In this survey, we focus on reviewing existing literature from the two primary aspects (1) why tool learning is beneficial and (2) how tool learning is implemented, enabling a comprehensive understanding of tool learning with LLMs. We first explore the why by reviewing both the benefits of tool integration and the inherent benefits of the tool learning paradigm from six specific aspects. In terms of how, we systematically review the literature according to a taxonomy of four key stages in the tool learning workflow: task planning, tool selection, tool calling, and response generation. Additionally, we provide a detailed summary of existing benchmarks and evaluation methods, categorizing them according to their relevance to different stages. Finally, we discuss current challenges and outline potential future directions, aiming to inspire both researchers and industrial developers to further explore this emerging and promising area. We also maintain a GitHub repository to continually keep track of the relevant papers and resources in this rising area at url{https://github.com/quchangle1/LLM-Tool-Survey}.
Read more5/31/2024
0
Planning and Editing What You Retrieve for Enhanced Tool Learning
Tenghao Huang, Dongwon Jung, Muhao Chen
Recent advancements in integrating external tools with Large Language Models (LLMs) have opened new frontiers, with applications in mathematical reasoning, code generators, and smart assistants. However, existing methods, relying on simple one-time retrieval strategies, fall short on effectively and accurately shortlisting relevant tools. This paper introduces a novel PLUTO (Planning, Learning, and Understanding for TOols) approach, encompassing `Plan-and-Retrieve (P&R)` and `Edit-and-Ground (E&G)` paradigms. The P&R paradigm consists of a neural retrieval module for shortlisting relevant tools and an LLM-based query planner that decomposes complex queries into actionable tasks, enhancing the effectiveness of tool utilization. The E&G paradigm utilizes LLMs to enrich tool descriptions based on user scenarios, bridging the gap between user queries and tool functionalities. Experiment results demonstrate that these paradigms significantly improve the recall and NDCG in tool retrieval tasks, significantly surpassing current state-of-the-art models.
Read more4/5/2024