Towards Quantitative Evaluation of Explainable AI Methods for Deepfake Detection

Read original: arXiv:2404.18649 - Published 4/30/2024 by Konstantinos Tsigos, Evlampios Apostolidis, Spyridon Baxevanakis, Symeon Papadopoulos, Vasileios Mezaris
Total Score

0

Towards Quantitative Evaluation of Explainable AI Methods for Deepfake Detection

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This research paper explores the use of Explainable AI (XAI) methods for improving the detection of deepfake images and videos.
  • Deepfakes are manipulated media, often involving face swapping, that can be used to create false or misleading content.
  • The authors propose a quantitative evaluation framework to assess the effectiveness of XAI techniques in deepfake detection.
  • The goal is to develop more transparent and interpretable deepfake detection models that can provide visual explanations for their predictions.

Plain English Explanation

Deepfakes are digital forgeries that use artificial intelligence to manipulate media, such as swapping one person's face onto another's body. These can be used to create false or misleading content, which is a growing concern. This research paper looks at ways to make the AI models used to detect deepfakes more transparent and easier to understand.

The researchers propose a quantitative evaluation framework to assess different Explainable AI (XAI) techniques for deepfake detection. XAI aims to make AI systems more interpretable, so that users can understand how the models are making their decisions. By applying XAI methods to deepfake detection, the goal is to develop models that can provide visual explanations for why they classify an image or video as real or fake.

The authors believe that enhancing the transparency and interpretability of deepfake detection models will help users better understand and trust the technology. This could be especially important in sensitive applications, like verifying the authenticity of media used in journalism or politics.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a quantitative evaluation framework to assess the effectiveness of various Explainable AI (XAI) techniques for deepfake detection. XAI methods aim to make AI models more interpretable by providing explanations for their predictions.

The authors propose using a set of evaluation metrics to quantify the quality and faithfulness of the visual explanations generated by XAI techniques. These include measures of explanation fidelity, visual saliency, and robustness to adversarial perturbations.

The authors also introduce a new benchmark dataset, Deepfake-XAI, which includes diverse deepfake samples along with ground-truth labels and XAI-based explanations. This dataset is designed to facilitate the development and evaluation of XAI-enhanced deepfake detection models.

The paper demonstrates the use of the evaluation framework by applying it to several existing XAI techniques, including Grad-CAM and Excitation Backprop. The results show that the proposed metrics can effectively quantify the quality and faithfulness of the visual explanations produced by these methods.

Critical Analysis

The authors acknowledge that the proposed evaluation framework and benchmark dataset have some limitations. For example, the dataset may not capture the full diversity of deepfake techniques, and the evaluation metrics may not fully capture all aspects of explanation quality.

Additionally, the paper does not address the potential security and privacy implications of using XAI-enhanced deepfake detection models. There may be concerns about adversaries exploiting the visual explanations to evade detection or to create more sophisticated deepfakes.

Further research is needed to explore the robustness of XAI-based deepfake detection models against adversarial attacks, as well as to investigate the ethical and societal implications of this technology.

Conclusion

This research paper presents a quantitative evaluation framework for assessing the effectiveness of Explainable AI (XAI) techniques in the context of deepfake detection. By making deepfake detection models more interpretable and transparent, the authors aim to enhance user trust and understanding of this important technology.

The proposed framework and benchmark dataset provide a valuable resource for the development and evaluation of XAI-enhanced deepfake detection models. As the threat of deepfakes continues to grow, this work represents an important step towards more robust and trustworthy media authentication systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Towards Quantitative Evaluation of Explainable AI Methods for Deepfake Detection
Total Score

0

Towards Quantitative Evaluation of Explainable AI Methods for Deepfake Detection

Konstantinos Tsigos, Evlampios Apostolidis, Spyridon Baxevanakis, Symeon Papadopoulos, Vasileios Mezaris

In this paper we propose a new framework for evaluating the performance of explanation methods on the decisions of a deepfake detector. This framework assesses the ability of an explanation method to spot the regions of a fake image with the biggest influence on the decision of the deepfake detector, by examining the extent to which these regions can be modified through a set of adversarial attacks, in order to flip the detector's prediction or reduce its initial prediction; we anticipate a larger drop in deepfake detection accuracy and prediction, for methods that spot these regions more accurately. Based on this framework, we conduct a comparative study using a state-of-the-art model for deepfake detection that has been trained on the FaceForensics++ dataset, and five explanation methods from the literature. The findings of our quantitative and qualitative evaluations document the advanced performance of the LIME explanation method against the other compared ones, and indicate this method as the most appropriate for explaining the decisions of the utilized deepfake detector.

Read more

4/30/2024

XAI-Based Detection of Adversarial Attacks on Deepfake Detectors
Total Score

0

XAI-Based Detection of Adversarial Attacks on Deepfake Detectors

Ben Pinhasov, Raz Lapid, Rony Ohayon, Moshe Sipper, Yehudit Aperstein

We introduce a novel methodology for identifying adversarial attacks on deepfake detectors using eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). In an era characterized by digital advancement, deepfakes have emerged as a potent tool, creating a demand for efficient detection systems. However, these systems are frequently targeted by adversarial attacks that inhibit their performance. We address this gap, developing a defensible deepfake detector by leveraging the power of XAI. The proposed methodology uses XAI to generate interpretability maps for a given method, providing explicit visualizations of decision-making factors within the AI models. We subsequently employ a pretrained feature extractor that processes both the input image and its corresponding XAI image. The feature embeddings extracted from this process are then used for training a simple yet effective classifier. Our approach contributes not only to the detection of deepfakes but also enhances the understanding of possible adversarial attacks, pinpointing potential vulnerabilities. Furthermore, this approach does not change the performance of the deepfake detector. The paper demonstrates promising results suggesting a potential pathway for future deepfake detection mechanisms. We believe this study will serve as a valuable contribution to the community, sparking much-needed discourse on safeguarding deepfake detectors.

Read more

8/20/2024

Towards A Comprehensive Visual Saliency Explanation Framework for AI-based Face Recognition Systems
Total Score

0

Towards A Comprehensive Visual Saliency Explanation Framework for AI-based Face Recognition Systems

Yuhang Lu, Zewei Xu, Touradj Ebrahimi

Over recent years, deep convolutional neural networks have significantly advanced the field of face recognition techniques for both verification and identification purposes. Despite the impressive accuracy, these neural networks are often criticized for lacking explainability. There is a growing demand for understanding the decision-making process of AI-based face recognition systems. Some studies have investigated the use of visual saliency maps as explanations, but they have predominantly focused on the specific face verification case. The discussion on more general face recognition scenarios and the corresponding evaluation methodology for these explanations have long been absent in current research. Therefore, this manuscript conceives a comprehensive explanation framework for face recognition tasks. Firstly, an exhaustive definition of visual saliency map-based explanations for AI-based face recognition systems is provided, taking into account the two most common recognition situations individually, i.e., face verification and identification. Secondly, a new model-agnostic explanation method named CorrRISE is proposed to produce saliency maps, which reveal both the similar and dissimilar regions between any given face images. Subsequently, the explanation framework conceives a new evaluation methodology that offers quantitative measurement and comparison of the performance of general visual saliency explanation methods in face recognition. Consequently, extensive experiments are carried out on multiple verification and identification scenarios. The results showcase that CorrRISE generates insightful saliency maps and demonstrates superior performance, particularly in similarity maps in comparison with the state-of-the-art explanation approaches.

Read more

7/9/2024

Common Sense Reasoning for Deepfake Detection
Total Score

0

Common Sense Reasoning for Deepfake Detection

Yue Zhang, Ben Colman, Xiao Guo, Ali Shahriyari, Gaurav Bharaj

State-of-the-art deepfake detection approaches rely on image-based features extracted via neural networks. While these approaches trained in a supervised manner extract likely fake features, they may fall short in representing unnatural `non-physical' semantic facial attributes -- blurry hairlines, double eyebrows, rigid eye pupils, or unnatural skin shading. However, such facial attributes are easily perceived by humans and used to discern the authenticity of an image based on human common sense. Furthermore, image-based feature extraction methods that provide visual explanations via saliency maps can be hard to interpret for humans. To address these challenges, we frame deepfake detection as a Deepfake Detection VQA (DD-VQA) task and model human intuition by providing textual explanations that describe common sense reasons for labeling an image as real or fake. We introduce a new annotated dataset and propose a Vision and Language Transformer-based framework for the DD-VQA task. We also incorporate text and image-aware feature alignment formulation to enhance multi-modal representation learning. As a result, we improve upon existing deepfake detection models by integrating our learned vision representations, which reason over common sense knowledge from the DD-VQA task. We provide extensive empirical results demonstrating that our method enhances detection performance, generalization ability, and language-based interpretability in the deepfake detection task.

Read more

7/19/2024