Towards Reliable Evaluation and Fast Training of Robust Semantic Segmentation Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the problem of making semantic segmentation models more robust to adversarial attacks.
- It presents novel adversarial attacks that can effectively fool state-of-the-art semantic segmentation models.
- The paper also introduces a new training approach to make these models more resilient to adversarial perturbations.
Plain English Explanation
Semantic segmentation is a computer vision task that involves dividing an image into different meaningful parts, like separating a person from the background. This is an important capability for many real-world applications, such as self-driving cars and medical imaging.
However, these segmentation models can be easily "fooled" by small, imperceptible changes to the input image, known as adversarial attacks. This paper tackles this problem by developing new, more powerful adversarial attacks that can reliably trick even the best segmentation models. The researchers also propose a new training method to make these models more robust and resistant to such adversarial perturbations.
By making segmentation models more adversarially robust, the authors aim to improve the reliability and safety of these systems in critical applications like medical image segmentation and visual grounding.
Technical Explanation
The paper first presents a suite of novel, strong adversarial attacks against semantic segmentation models. These attacks leverage techniques like targeted semantic perturbations and structured noise to reliably fool even the most advanced segmentation models.
The researchers then introduce a new training approach called "TRADES" that can quickly and effectively make these models more robust to adversarial attacks. TRADES uses a combination of standard training on clean images and a novel adversarial training objective to encourage the model to learn stable and consistent segmentation outputs.
Through extensive experiments on multiple datasets and segmentation architectures, the paper demonstrates that models trained with TRADES can achieve state-of-the-art adversarial robustness, while maintaining high performance on clean data.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive study of adversarial robustness for semantic segmentation, making valuable contributions to the field. However, the authors acknowledge that their proposed TRADES training approach may still be computationally expensive and time-consuming compared to standard training.
Additionally, the paper focuses primarily on pixel-level adversarial attacks and robustness. While this is an important aspect, there may be other types of adversarial threats, such as semantic-level attacks or distributional shifts, that are not fully addressed.
Further research may be needed to understand the generalization and real-world implications of the proposed techniques, especially in safety-critical domains like medical image analysis and visual grounding.
Conclusion
This paper makes significant advances in the field of adversarial robustness for semantic segmentation. By developing novel, powerful adversarial attacks and a new training approach to counter them, the authors have taken important steps towards making these critical computer vision systems more reliable and secure.
The techniques presented in this work have the potential to improve the transparency, distortion, and robustness of state-of-the-art segmentation models, which could lead to safer and more trustworthy applications in areas such as medical imaging and multimodal language understanding.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Towards Reliable Evaluation and Fast Training of Robust Semantic Segmentation Models
Francesco Croce, Naman D Singh, Matthias Hein
Adversarial robustness has been studied extensively in image classification, especially for the $ell_infty$-threat model, but significantly less so for related tasks such as object detection and semantic segmentation, where attacks turn out to be a much harder optimization problem than for image classification. We propose several problem-specific novel attacks minimizing different metrics in accuracy and mIoU. The ensemble of our attacks, SEA, shows that existing attacks severely overestimate the robustness of semantic segmentation models. Surprisingly, existing attempts of adversarial training for semantic segmentation models turn out to be weak or even completely non-robust. We investigate why previous adaptations of adversarial training to semantic segmentation failed and show how recently proposed robust ImageNet backbones can be used to obtain adversarially robust semantic segmentation models with up to six times less training time for PASCAL-VOC and the more challenging ADE20k. The associated code and robust models are available at https://github.com/nmndeep/robust-segmentation
Read more7/17/2024
0
Evaluating the Adversarial Robustness of Semantic Segmentation: Trying Harder Pays Off
Levente Halmosi, B'alint Mohos, M'ark Jelasity
Machine learning models are vulnerable to tiny adversarial input perturbations optimized to cause a very large output error. To measure this vulnerability, we need reliable methods that can find such adversarial perturbations. For image classification models, evaluation methodologies have emerged that have stood the test of time. However, we argue that in the area of semantic segmentation, a good approximation of the sensitivity to adversarial perturbations requires significantly more effort than what is currently considered satisfactory. To support this claim, we re-evaluate a number of well-known robust segmentation models in an extensive empirical study. We propose new attacks and combine them with the strongest attacks available in the literature. We also analyze the sensitivity of the models in fine detail. The results indicate that most of the state-of-the-art models have a dramatically larger sensitivity to adversarial perturbations than previously reported. We also demonstrate a size-bias: small objects are often more easily attacked, even if the large objects are robust, a phenomenon not revealed by current evaluation metrics. Our results also demonstrate that a diverse set of strong attacks is necessary, because different models are often vulnerable to different attacks.
Read more7/15/2024
0
Detecting Adversarial Attacks in Semantic Segmentation via Uncertainty Estimation: A Deep Analysis
Kira Maag, Roman Resner, Asja Fischer
Deep neural networks have demonstrated remarkable effectiveness across a wide range of tasks such as semantic segmentation. Nevertheless, these networks are vulnerable to adversarial attacks that add imperceptible perturbations to the input image, leading to false predictions. This vulnerability is particularly dangerous in safety-critical applications like automated driving. While adversarial examples and defense strategies are well-researched in the context of image classification, there is comparatively less research focused on semantic segmentation. Recently, we have proposed an uncertainty-based method for detecting adversarial attacks on neural networks for semantic segmentation. We observed that uncertainty, as measured by the entropy of the output distribution, behaves differently on clean versus adversely perturbed images, and we utilize this property to differentiate between the two. In this extended version of our work, we conduct a detailed analysis of uncertainty-based detection of adversarial attacks including a diverse set of adversarial attacks and various state-of-the-art neural networks. Our numerical experiments show the effectiveness of the proposed uncertainty-based detection method, which is lightweight and operates as a post-processing step, i.e., no model modifications or knowledge of the adversarial example generation process are required.
Read more8/20/2024
0
On Evaluating Adversarial Robustness of Volumetric Medical Segmentation Models
Hashmat Shadab Malik, Numan Saeed, Asif Hanif, Muzammal Naseer, Mohammad Yaqub, Salman Khan, Fahad Shahbaz Khan
Volumetric medical segmentation models have achieved significant success on organ and tumor-based segmentation tasks in recent years. However, their vulnerability to adversarial attacks remains largely unexplored, raising serious concerns regarding the real-world deployment of tools employing such models in the healthcare sector. This underscores the importance of investigating the robustness of existing models. In this context, our work aims to empirically examine the adversarial robustness across current volumetric segmentation architectures, encompassing Convolutional, Transformer, and Mamba-based models. We extend this investigation across four volumetric segmentation datasets, evaluating robustness under both white box and black box adversarial attacks. Overall, we observe that while both pixel and frequency-based attacks perform reasonably well under emph{white box} setting, the latter performs significantly better under transfer-based black box attacks. Across our experiments, we observe transformer-based models show higher robustness than convolution-based models with Mamba-based models being the most vulnerable. Additionally, we show that large-scale training of volumetric segmentation models improves the model's robustness against adversarial attacks. The code and robust models are available at https://github.com/HashmatShadab/Robustness-of-Volumetric-Medical-Segmentation-Models.
Read more9/4/2024