Tradeoffs When Considering Deep Reinforcement Learning for Contingency Management in Advanced Air Mobility
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The provided paper explores the tradeoffs of using deep reinforcement learning (DRL) for contingency management in advanced air mobility systems.
- It examines the potential benefits and challenges of applying DRL techniques to handle unexpected events and maintain safe, efficient operations.
- The paper aims to inform decision-making around the use of DRL in this context by highlighting key considerations.
Plain English Explanation
Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) is a type of artificial intelligence that allows systems to learn how to make decisions by interacting with their environment and receiving feedback. In the context of advanced air mobility, such as air taxis or urban air vehicles, DRL could potentially be used to help manage unexpected situations or contingencies that arise during flight.
The key idea is that by training a DRL system on a wide range of possible scenarios, it could learn to quickly respond to and mitigate issues in real-time, potentially outperforming traditional control systems. This could lead to improved safety, efficiency, and reliability for advanced air mobility operations.
However, the provided paper also highlights several important tradeoffs and challenges that need to be considered. For example, the complex nature of DRL systems can make them difficult to validate and verify, which is critical for safety-critical applications. There are also concerns around the generalization of DRL models to handle the full range of potential contingencies.
Overall, the paper aims to provide a balanced perspective on the use of DRL for contingency management in advanced air mobility, exploring both the potential benefits and the technical hurdles that would need to be overcome.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by providing background on the use of DRL in advanced air mobility applications, highlighting its potential for improving safety and efficiency through rapid decision-making and adaptability.
The authors then delve into the specific challenges of applying DRL to contingency management, which requires the system to quickly identify and respond to unexpected events or failures. This is a complex task that involves accurately modeling the aircraft dynamics, predicting the implications of various actions, and selecting the optimal course of action to mitigate the contingency.
The paper explores several key tradeoffs, such as the balance between model complexity and interpretability, the need for comprehensive training data to ensure reliable performance, and the challenges of verifying and validating DRL systems for safety-critical applications. The authors also discuss the potential limitations of DRL in handling the full range of possible contingencies.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thoughtful and well-rounded discussion of the tradeoffs involved in using DRL for contingency management in advanced air mobility. The authors acknowledge the potential benefits of DRL, such as its ability to adapt quickly to dynamic situations, but they also clearly articulate the significant technical challenges that would need to be addressed.
One aspect that could be explored further is the impact of the training data used for the DRL system. The authors mention the need for comprehensive data, but they could delve deeper into the implications of potential biases or gaps in the training set, and how that could affect the system's performance in real-world scenarios.
Additionally, the paper could have examined more closely the trade-offs between the increased complexity and decision-making capabilities of DRL systems and the need for transparency and interpretability, especially in safety-critical applications where human oversight and understanding are crucial.
Overall, the paper offers a valuable contribution to the ongoing discussion around the use of DRL in advanced air mobility, highlighting the importance of carefully considering the technical limitations and risks before deploying such systems in practice.
Conclusion
The paper presents a thorough examination of the tradeoffs involved in using deep reinforcement learning (DRL) for contingency management in advanced air mobility systems. While DRL offers the potential for rapid, adaptive decision-making that could improve safety and efficiency, the authors clearly outline the significant technical challenges that would need to be overcome.
Key considerations include the complexity and interpretability of DRL models, the need for comprehensive training data, and the difficulty of verifying and validating these systems for safety-critical applications. The paper serves as a useful reference for researchers and practitioners in the field, encouraging a thoughtful and balanced approach to the deployment of DRL in advanced air mobility.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Tradeoffs When Considering Deep Reinforcement Learning for Contingency Management in Advanced Air Mobility
Luis E. Alvarez, Marc W. Brittain, Steven D. Young
Air transportation is undergoing a rapid evolution globally with the introduction of Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) and with it comes novel challenges and opportunities for transforming aviation. As AAM operations introduce increasing heterogeneity in vehicle capabilities and density, increased levels of automation are likely necessary to achieve operational safety and efficiency goals. This paper focuses on one example where increased automation has been suggested. Autonomous operations will need contingency management systems that can monitor evolving risk across a span of interrelated (or interdependent) hazards and, if necessary, execute appropriate control interventions via supervised or automated decision making. Accommodating this complex environment may require automated functions (autonomy) that apply artificial intelligence (AI) techniques that can adapt and respond to a quickly changing environment. This paper explores the use of Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) which has shown promising performance in complex and high-dimensional environments where the objective can be constructed as a sequential decision-making problem. An extension of a prior formulation of the contingency management problem as a Markov Decision Process (MDP) is presented and uses a DRL framework to train agents that mitigate hazards present in the simulation environment. A comparison of these learning-based agents and classical techniques is presented in terms of their performance, verification difficulties, and development process.
Read more7/2/2024
🏅
0
A Survey on Reinforcement Learning in Aviation Applications
Pouria Razzaghi, Amin Tabrizian, Wei Guo, Shulu Chen, Abenezer Taye, Ellis Thompson, Alexis Bregeon, Ali Baheri, Peng Wei
Compared with model-based control and optimization methods, reinforcement learning (RL) provides a data-driven, learning-based framework to formulate and solve sequential decision-making problems. The RL framework has become promising due to largely improved data availability and computing power in the aviation industry. Many aviation-based applications can be formulated or treated as sequential decision-making problems. Some of them are offline planning problems, while others need to be solved online and are safety-critical. In this survey paper, we first describe standard RL formulations and solutions. Then we survey the landscape of existing RL-based applications in aviation. Finally, we summarize the paper, identify the technical gaps, and suggest future directions of RL research in aviation.
Read more7/29/2024
0
DeepAir: A Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Scheme for an Unknown User Location Problem
Baris Yamansavascilar, Atay Ozgovde, Cem Ersoy
The deployment of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in many different settings has provided various solutions and strategies for networking paradigms. Therefore, it reduces the complexity of the developments for the existing problems, which otherwise require more sophisticated approaches. One of those existing problems is the unknown user locations in an infrastructure-less environment in which users cannot connect to any communication device or computation-providing server, which is essential to task offloading in order to achieve the required quality of service (QoS). Therefore, in this study, we investigate this problem thoroughly and propose a novel deep reinforcement learning (DRL) based scheme, DeepAir. DeepAir considers all of the necessary steps including sensing, localization, resource allocation, and multi-access edge computing (MEC) to achieve QoS requirements for the offloaded tasks without violating the maximum tolerable delay. To this end, we use two types of UAVs including detector UAVs, and serving UAVs. We utilize detector UAVs as DRL agents which ensure sensing, localization, and resource allocation. On the other hand, we utilize serving UAVs to provide MEC features. Our experiments show that DeepAir provides a high task success rate by deploying fewer detector UAVs in the environment, which includes different numbers of users and user attraction points, compared to benchmark methods.
Read more8/13/2024
🤿
0
New!Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Cyber Operations: A Survey
Gregory Palmer, Chris Parry, Daniel J. B. Harrold, Chris Willis
The rapid increase in the number of cyber-attacks in recent years raises the need for principled methods for defending networks against malicious actors. Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has emerged as a promising approach for mitigating these attacks. However, while DRL has shown much potential for cyber defence, numerous challenges must be overcome before DRL can be applied to autonomous cyber operations (ACO) at scale. Principled methods are required for environments that confront learners with very high-dimensional state spaces, large multi-discrete action spaces, and adversarial learning. Recent works have reported success in solving these problems individually. There have also been impressive engineering efforts towards solving all three for real-time strategy games. However, applying DRL to the full ACO problem remains an open challenge. Here, we survey the relevant DRL literature and conceptualize an idealised ACO-DRL agent. We provide: i.) A summary of the domain properties that define the ACO problem; ii.) A comprehensive comparison of current ACO environments used for benchmarking DRL approaches; iii.) An overview of state-of-the-art approaches for scaling DRL to domains that confront learners with the curse of dimensionality, and; iv.) A survey and critique of current methods for limiting the exploitability of agents within adversarial settings from the perspective of ACO. We conclude with open research questions that we hope will motivate future directions for researchers and practitioners working on ACO.
Read more9/17/2024