Training Verifiably Robust Agents Using Set-Based Reinforcement Learning

Read original: arXiv:2408.09112 - Published 8/20/2024 by Manuel Wendl, Lukas Koller, Tobias Ladner, Matthias Althoff
Total Score

0

🏋️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Reinforcement learning often uses neural networks to solve complex control tasks.
  • Neural networks are sensitive to input perturbations, which makes their deployment in safety-critical environments challenging.
  • This work applies recent results from formally verifying neural networks against disturbances to reinforcement learning in continuous state and action spaces using reachability analysis.
  • Previous work has focused on adversarial attacks for robust reinforcement learning, but this paper trains neural networks to maximize the worst-case reward across a set of perturbed inputs.
  • The resulting agents are shown to be more robust than those from related work, making them more applicable in safety-critical environments.

Plain English Explanation

Reinforcement learning is a type of machine learning where an agent learns to make decisions by interacting with an environment and receiving rewards. Neural networks are often used to solve complex control tasks in reinforcement learning, but they have a weakness - they are sensitive to small changes in their inputs, which can cause them to make very different decisions.

This is a problem when deploying reinforcement learning agents in safety-critical environments, like self-driving cars or robots working around humans. If the agent's behavior can be easily disrupted by minor disturbances, it could lead to dangerous situations.

To address this, the researchers in this paper applied recent techniques for formally verifying the safety of neural networks to reinforcement learning problems with continuous state and action spaces. Rather than just trying to defend against specific "adversarial attacks," they trained the neural networks to maximize the worst-case reward across a whole set of possible input disturbances.

The result is reinforcement learning agents that are provably more robust than previous approaches. This makes them more suitable for use in safety-critical applications, where it's important that the agent's behavior remains reliable even when faced with unexpected perturbations.

Technical Explanation

The key innovation in this work is the application of reachability analysis to formally verify the robustness of reinforcement learning agents. Reachability analysis allows the researchers to compute the set of all possible states the agent can reach, given a set of allowed disturbances to the inputs.

By maximizing the worst-case reward over this set of reachable states, the training process ensures the agent performs well even in the face of significant input perturbations. This is in contrast to previous work, which has focused more on defending against specific adversarial attacks.

The paper evaluates this approach on four different benchmark problems, demonstrating that the resulting agents are more robust than those from related methods. This suggests the technique could be valuable for deploying reinforcement learning in safety-critical domains.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a rigorous technical approach to improving the robustness of reinforcement learning agents, which is an important challenge for real-world applications. However, some potential limitations and areas for further research are:

  • The focus is on continuous state and action spaces, but many real-world reinforcement learning problems involve discrete or hybrid action spaces.
  • The experimental evaluation, while extensive, is still limited to a relatively small number of benchmark problems. More testing in realistic, complex environments would be valuable.
  • The computational cost of the reachability analysis may limit the scalability of the approach, especially for larger and more complex neural network models.

Overall, this is a promising line of research that could help make reinforcement learning more reliable and deployable in safety-critical domains. But further work is needed to address some of the potential limitations and expand the practical applicability of the techniques.

Conclusion

This paper presents an innovative approach to improving the robustness of reinforcement learning agents by applying techniques from formal verification of neural networks. By maximizing the worst-case reward over a set of reachable states, the trained agents are shown to be more reliable in the face of input perturbations than previous methods.

This is an important step towards making reinforcement learning more suitable for deployment in safety-critical environments, where the agent's behavior needs to remain stable and predictable even when faced with unexpected disturbances. While some challenges remain, this work demonstrates the value of combining formal verification with reinforcement learning to enhance the safety and reliability of autonomous systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🏋️

Total Score

0

Training Verifiably Robust Agents Using Set-Based Reinforcement Learning

Manuel Wendl, Lukas Koller, Tobias Ladner, Matthias Althoff

Reinforcement learning often uses neural networks to solve complex control tasks. However, neural networks are sensitive to input perturbations, which makes their deployment in safety-critical environments challenging. This work lifts recent results from formally verifying neural networks against such disturbances to reinforcement learning in continuous state and action spaces using reachability analysis. While previous work mainly focuses on adversarial attacks for robust reinforcement learning, we train neural networks utilizing entire sets of perturbed inputs and maximize the worst-case reward. The obtained agents are verifiably more robust than agents obtained by related work, making them more applicable in safety-critical environments. This is demonstrated with an extensive empirical evaluation of four different benchmarks.

Read more

8/20/2024

🏋️

Total Score

0

Set-Based Training for Neural Network Verification

Lukas Koller, Tobias Ladner, Matthias Althoff

Neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, i.e., small input perturbations can significantly affect the outputs of a neural network. In safety-critical environments, the inputs often contain noisy sensor data; hence, in this case, neural networks that are robust against input perturbations are required. To ensure safety, the robustness of a neural network must be formally verified. However, training and formally verifying robust neural networks is challenging. We address both of these challenges by employing, for the first time, an end-to-end set-based training procedure that trains robust neural networks for formal verification. Our training procedure trains neural networks, which can be easily verified using simple polynomial-time verification algorithms. Moreover, our extensive evaluation demonstrates that our set-based training procedure effectively trains robust neural networks, which are easier to verify. Set-based trained neural networks consistently match or outperform those trained with state-of-the-art robust training approaches.

Read more

4/22/2024

🏅

Total Score

0

Verified Safe Reinforcement Learning for Neural Network Dynamic Models

Junlin Wu, Huan Zhang, Yevgeniy Vorobeychik

Learning reliably safe autonomous control is one of the core problems in trustworthy autonomy. However, training a controller that can be formally verified to be safe remains a major challenge. We introduce a novel approach for learning verified safe control policies in nonlinear neural dynamical systems while maximizing overall performance. Our approach aims to achieve safety in the sense of finite-horizon reachability proofs, and is comprised of three key parts. The first is a novel curriculum learning scheme that iteratively increases the verified safe horizon. The second leverages the iterative nature of gradient-based learning to leverage incremental verification, reusing information from prior verification runs. Finally, we learn multiple verified initial-state-dependent controllers, an idea that is especially valuable for more complex domains where learning a single universal verified safe controller is extremely challenging. Our experiments on five safe control problems demonstrate that our trained controllers can achieve verified safety over horizons that are as much as an order of magnitude longer than state-of-the-art baselines, while maintaining high reward, as well as a perfect safety record over entire episodes.

Read more

5/28/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Learning-Based Verification of Stochastic Dynamical Systems with Neural Network Policies

Thom Badings, Wietze Koops, Sebastian Junges, Nils Jansen

We consider the verification of neural network policies for reach-avoid control tasks in stochastic dynamical systems. We use a verification procedure that trains another neural network, which acts as a certificate proving that the policy satisfies the task. For reach-avoid tasks, it suffices to show that this certificate network is a reach-avoid supermartingale (RASM). As our main contribution, we significantly accelerate algorithmic approaches for verifying that a neural network is indeed a RASM. The main bottleneck of these approaches is the discretization of the state space of the dynamical system. The following two key contributions allow us to use a coarser discretization than existing approaches. First, we present a novel and fast method to compute tight upper bounds on Lipschitz constants of neural networks based on weighted norms. We further improve these bounds on Lipschitz constants based on the characteristics of the certificate network. Second, we integrate an efficient local refinement scheme that dynamically refines the state space discretization where necessary. Our empirical evaluation shows the effectiveness of our approach for verifying neural network policies in several benchmarks and trained with different reinforcement learning algorithms.

Read more

6/4/2024