Are you still on track!? Catching LLM Task Drift with Activations
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the issue of task drift in large language models (LLMs), where an LLM's performance on a task can deteriorate over time.
- The researchers propose a method to detect task drift by monitoring the activations (internal representations) of the LLM during the task.
- They demonstrate that tracking activation patterns can effectively identify when an LLM has drifted from its original task, allowing for timely intervention.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 are powerful tools that can perform a wide variety of tasks, from answering questions to generating text. However, over time, these models can start to "drift" away from the original task they were trained for, leading to a decline in performance.
This paper presents a way to detect when an LLM is starting to drift from its original task. The key idea is to monitor the internal representations, or "activations," inside the LLM as it performs the task. If the activations start to change in a way that indicates the model is no longer focused on the original task, that's a sign of task drift.
By tracking the activations, the researchers were able to identify when an LLM had started to drift away from the task it was originally trained for. This allows for early intervention, where the model can be corrected or retrained before its performance deteriorates too much.
The ability to detect task drift is important because it helps ensure that LLMs continue to reliably perform the tasks they were designed for, even as they are used over long periods of time. This is crucial for applications where consistent performance is essential, such as in language models can exploit cross-task context, cross-task defense instruction tuning llms content, apprentices to research assistants advancing research large, active label correction building llm based modular, and harnessing large language models software vulnerability detection.
Technical Explanation
The researchers used a combination of techniques to detect task drift in LLMs. First, they trained an LLM on a specific task, such as question answering. Then, as the model continued to perform the task over time, they monitored the activations (internal representations) of the model's neurons.
If the activations started to deviate significantly from the original pattern, the researchers could detect that the model was drifting away from the intended task. This allowed them to identify task drift much earlier than waiting for the model's performance to deteriorate.
The researchers tested their approach on several different tasks and found that it was effective at catching task drift in a timely manner. They also explored how factors like model size, training data, and task complexity could impact the detection of task drift.
Overall, this work provides an important tool for ensuring that LLMs maintain their intended functionality over time, which is crucial for real-world applications of these powerful language models.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach for detecting task drift in LLMs, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research:
- The experiments were conducted on relatively simple tasks, and the researchers note that more complex tasks may present additional challenges for activation-based drift detection.
- The approach relies on having a well-defined "target" activation pattern for the original task, which may not always be available in practice.
- The paper does not explore the potential causes of task drift, such as the model's exposure to diverse data during continued use or the inherent instability of large neural networks.
- While the activation-based detection method was effective, the paper does not address how to actually correct or mitigate the task drift once it is detected.
Additional research is needed to understand the broader implications of task drift in LLMs and develop more robust solutions for maintaining model performance over time. Exploration of language models can exploit cross-task context, cross-task defense instruction tuning llms content, apprentices to research assistants advancing research large, active label correction building llm based modular, and harnessing large language models software vulnerability detection could provide valuable insights in this area.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to detecting task drift in large language models, which is a critical issue for ensuring the reliable and consistent performance of these powerful AI systems over time. By monitoring the internal activations of the models, the researchers were able to identify when an LLM had started to drift away from its original task, enabling early intervention.
While the paper has some limitations, it represents an important step forward in addressing the challenge of task drift in LLMs. As these models continue to be deployed in an ever-widening range of applications, the ability to maintain their intended functionality will be essential for realizing the full potential of large language models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Are you still on track!? Catching LLM Task Drift with Activations
Sahar Abdelnabi, Aideen Fay, Giovanni Cherubin, Ahmed Salem, Mario Fritz, Andrew Paverd
Large Language Models (LLMs) are routinely used in retrieval-augmented applications to orchestrate tasks and process inputs from users and other sources. These inputs, even in a single LLM interaction, can come from a variety of sources, of varying trustworthiness and provenance. This opens the door to prompt injection attacks, where the LLM receives and acts upon instructions from supposedly data-only sources, thus deviating from the user's original instructions. We define this as task drift, and we propose to catch it by scanning and analyzing the LLM's activations. We compare the LLM's activations before and after processing the external input in order to detect whether this input caused instruction drift. We develop two probing methods and find that simply using a linear classifier can detect drift with near perfect ROC AUC on an out-of-distribution test set. We show that this approach generalizes surprisingly well to unseen task domains, such as prompt injections, jailbreaks, and malicious instructions, without being trained on any of these attacks. Our setup does not require any modification of the LLM (e.g., fine-tuning) or any text generation, thus maximizing deployability and cost efficiency and avoiding reliance on unreliable model output. To foster future research on activation-based task inspection, decoding, and interpretability, we will release our large-scale TaskTracker toolkit, comprising a dataset of over 500K instances, representations from 5 SoTA language models, and inspection tools.
Read more7/22/2024
💬
0
Trojan Activation Attack: Red-Teaming Large Language Models using Activation Steering for Safety-Alignment
Haoran Wang, Kai Shu
To ensure AI safety, instruction-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) are specifically trained to ensure alignment, which refers to making models behave in accordance with human intentions. While these models have demonstrated commendable results on various safety benchmarks, the vulnerability of their safety alignment has not been extensively studied. This is particularly troubling given the potential harm that LLMs can inflict. Existing attack methods on LLMs often rely on poisoned training data or the injection of malicious prompts. These approaches compromise the stealthiness and generalizability of the attacks, making them susceptible to detection. Additionally, these models often demand substantial computational resources for implementation, making them less practical for real-world applications. In this work, we study a different attack scenario, called Trojan Activation Attack (TA^2), which injects trojan steering vectors into the activation layers of LLMs. These malicious steering vectors can be triggered at inference time to steer the models toward attacker-desired behaviors by manipulating their activations. Our experiment results on four primary alignment tasks show that TA^2 is highly effective and adds little or no overhead to attack efficiency. Additionally, we discuss potential countermeasures against such activation attacks.
Read more8/19/2024
0
Language Models can Exploit Cross-Task In-context Learning for Data-Scarce Novel Tasks
Anwoy Chatterjee, Eshaan Tanwar, Subhabrata Dutta, Tanmoy Chakraborty
Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed NLP with their remarkable In-context Learning (ICL) capabilities. Automated assistants based on LLMs are gaining popularity; however, adapting them to novel tasks is still challenging. While colossal models excel in zero-shot performance, their computational demands limit widespread use, and smaller language models struggle without context. This paper investigates whether LLMs can generalize from labeled examples of predefined tasks to novel tasks. Drawing inspiration from biological neurons and the mechanistic interpretation of the Transformer architecture, we explore the potential for information sharing across tasks. We design a cross-task prompting setup with three LLMs and show that LLMs achieve significant performance improvements despite no examples from the target task in the context. Cross-task prompting leads to a remarkable performance boost of 107% for LLaMA-2 7B, 18.6% for LLaMA-2 13B, and 3.2% for GPT 3.5 on average over zero-shot prompting, and performs comparable to standard in-context learning. The effectiveness of generating pseudo-labels for in-task examples is demonstrated, and our analyses reveal a strong correlation between the effect of cross-task examples and model activation similarities in source and target input tokens. This paper offers a first-of-its-kind exploration of LLMs' ability to solve novel tasks based on contextual signals from different task examples.
Read more6/13/2024
💬
0
Defending Large Language Models Against Attacks With Residual Stream Activation Analysis
Amelia Kawasaki, Andrew Davis, Houssam Abbas
The widespread adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs), exemplified by OpenAI's ChatGPT, brings to the forefront the imperative to defend against adversarial threats on these models. These attacks, which manipulate an LLM's output by introducing malicious inputs, undermine the model's integrity and the trust users place in its outputs. In response to this challenge, our paper presents an innovative defensive strategy, given white box access to an LLM, that harnesses residual activation analysis between transformer layers of the LLM. We apply a novel methodology for analyzing distinctive activation patterns in the residual streams for attack prompt classification. We curate multiple datasets to demonstrate how this method of classification has high accuracy across multiple types of attack scenarios, including our newly-created attack dataset. Furthermore, we enhance the model's resilience by integrating safety fine-tuning techniques for LLMs in order to measure its effect on our capability to detect attacks. The results underscore the effectiveness of our approach in enhancing the detection and mitigation of adversarial inputs, advancing the security framework within which LLMs operate.
Read more7/10/2024