Tuning Vision-Language Models with Candidate Labels by Prompt Alignment
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores a technique called "Prompt Alignment" for tuning vision-language models using candidate labels.
- It aims to enhance the performance of these models by aligning the prompts used during training with the target labels or outputs.
- The researchers propose several methods for achieving this prompt alignment, including Patch Prompt Aligned Bayesian Prompt Tuning and Pseudo-Prompt Generation.
- The paper also investigates how better text semantics from prompt tuning can improve the performance of vision-language models.
Plain English Explanation
Vision-language models are artificial intelligence systems that can understand and process both visual and textual information. These models have become increasingly important for tasks like image captioning, visual question answering, and multimodal reasoning.
However, training these models can be challenging, as they need to learn to effectively combine and process both visual and textual data. The researchers behind this paper propose a technique called "Prompt Alignment" to help improve the performance of these vision-language models.
The key idea is to align the "prompts" or instructions used during the model's training with the target labels or outputs that the model is trying to predict. By doing this, the model can better understand the relationship between the input (the image and text) and the desired output (the label or answer).
The researchers explore several methods for achieving this prompt alignment, such as Patch Prompt Aligned Bayesian Prompt Tuning and Pseudo-Prompt Generation. They also investigate how better text semantics from prompt tuning can further improve the performance of these vision-language models.
By aligning the prompts used during training with the target outputs, the researchers aim to help vision-language models better understand the relationships between visual and textual information, leading to improved performance on a variety of tasks.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a technique called "Prompt Alignment" for tuning vision-language models using candidate labels. The key idea is to align the prompts or instructions used during the model's training with the target labels or outputs that the model is trying to predict.
The researchers propose several methods for achieving this prompt alignment:
-
Patch Prompt Aligned Bayesian Prompt Tuning: This approach involves tuning the prompts used during training in a Bayesian manner, aligning them with the visual features of the input images.
-
Pseudo-Prompt Generation: The researchers generate pseudo-prompts from the candidate labels, which are then used to tune the vision-language model during training.
In addition, the paper investigates how better text semantics from prompt tuning can improve the performance of vision-language models. By enhancing the textual understanding of the model, the researchers aim to further improve its ability to integrate visual and textual information.
The researchers also explore the idea of using language models as black-box optimizers for vision tasks, leveraging the language model's powerful text understanding capabilities to enhance the vision-language model's performance.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed study with a clear focus on improving the performance of vision-language models through prompt alignment. The proposed techniques, such as Patch Prompt Aligned Bayesian Prompt Tuning and Pseudo-Prompt Generation, seem promising and are backed by a thorough experimental evaluation.
However, the paper does not address several potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
The impact of prompt quality: The effectiveness of the prompt alignment techniques may be heavily dependent on the quality and relevance of the candidate labels or prompts used. Further research is needed to understand how to generate high-quality prompts that effectively capture the desired output semantics.
-
Generalization to diverse tasks and datasets: The paper primarily evaluates the proposed methods on a few specific vision-language tasks and datasets. It would be valuable to assess the robustness and generalization of these techniques across a wider range of applications and data sources.
-
Computational efficiency: The paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the computational cost and training time associated with the proposed methods. As vision-language models become increasingly complex, the efficiency of the training process is an important consideration.
-
Interpretability and explainability: While the paper focuses on improving the performance of vision-language models, it does not address the issue of model interpretability and explainability. Understanding the reasoning behind the model's predictions could be crucial for real-world applications.
Overall, the paper presents a compelling approach to enhancing vision-language models through prompt alignment, but further research is needed to address the limitations and explore the broader implications of this work.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a technique called "Prompt Alignment" for tuning vision-language models using candidate labels. The key idea is to align the prompts or instructions used during the model's training with the target labels or outputs that the model is trying to predict.
The researchers propose several methods for achieving this prompt alignment, including Patch Prompt Aligned Bayesian Prompt Tuning and Pseudo-Prompt Generation. They also investigate how better text semantics from prompt tuning can improve the performance of vision-language models.
By aligning the prompts used during training with the target outputs, the researchers aim to help these models better understand the relationships between visual and textual information, leading to improved performance on a variety of tasks. The proposed techniques show promise, but further research is needed to address potential limitations, such as the impact of prompt quality, generalization to diverse tasks, computational efficiency, and model interpretability.
Overall, this paper contributes to the ongoing efforts to enhance the capabilities of vision-language models, which are increasingly important for applications ranging from image captioning to multimodal reasoning.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Tuning Vision-Language Models with Candidate Labels by Prompt Alignment
Zhifang Zhang, Beibei Li
Vision-language models (VLMs) can learn high-quality representations from a large-scale training dataset of image-text pairs. Prompt learning is a popular approach to fine-tuning VLM to adapt them to downstream tasks. Despite the satisfying performance, a major limitation of prompt learning is the demand for labelled data. In real-world scenarios, we may only obtain candidate labels (where the true label is included) instead of the true labels due to data privacy or sensitivity issues. In this paper, we provide the first study on prompt learning with candidate labels for VLMs. We empirically demonstrate that prompt learning is more advantageous than other fine-tuning methods, for handling candidate labels. Nonetheless, its performance drops when the label ambiguity increases. In order to improve its robustness, we propose a simple yet effective framework that better leverages the prior knowledge of VLMs to guide the learning process with candidate labels. Specifically, our framework disambiguates candidate labels by aligning the model output with the mixed class posterior jointly predicted by both the learnable and the handcrafted prompt. Besides, our framework can be equipped with various off-the-shelf training objectives for learning with candidate labels to further improve their performance. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed framework.
Read more7/12/2024
0
Candidate Pseudolabel Learning: Enhancing Vision-Language Models by Prompt Tuning with Unlabeled Data
Jiahan Zhang, Qi Wei, Feng Liu, Lei Feng
Fine-tuning vision-language models (VLMs) with abundant unlabeled data recently has attracted increasing attention. Existing methods that resort to the pseudolabeling strategy would suffer from heavily incorrect hard pseudolabels when VLMs exhibit low zero-shot performance in downstream tasks. To alleviate this issue, we propose a Candidate Pseudolabel Learning method, termed CPL, to fine-tune VLMs with suitable candidate pseudolabels of unlabeled data in downstream tasks. The core of our method lies in the generation strategy of candidate pseudolabels, which progressively generates refined candidate pseudolabels by both intra- and inter-instance label selection, based on a confidence score matrix for all unlabeled data. This strategy can result in better performance in true label inclusion and class-balanced instance selection. In this way, we can directly apply existing loss functions to learn with generated candidate psueudolabels. Extensive experiments on nine benchmark datasets with three learning paradigms demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. Our code can be found at https://github.com/vanillaer/CPL-ICML2024.
Read more6/18/2024
0
New!Mixture of Prompt Learning for Vision Language Models
Yu Du, Tong Niu, Rong Zhao
As powerful pre-trained vision-language models (VLMs) like CLIP gain prominence, numerous studies have attempted to combine VLMs for downstream tasks. Among these, prompt learning has been validated as an effective method for adapting to new tasks, which only requiring a small number of parameters. However, current prompt learning methods face two challenges: first, a single soft prompt struggles to capture the diverse styles and patterns within a dataset; second, fine-tuning soft prompts is prone to overfitting. To address these challenges, we propose a mixture of soft prompt learning method incorporating a routing module. This module is able to capture a dataset's varied styles and dynamically selects the most suitable prompts for each instance. Additionally, we introduce a novel gating mechanism to ensure the router selects prompts based on their similarity to hard prompt templates, which both retaining knowledge from hard prompts and improving selection accuracy. We also implement semantically grouped text-level supervision, initializing each soft prompt with the token embeddings of manually designed templates from its group and applied a contrastive loss between the resulted text feature and hard prompt encoded text feature. This supervision ensures that the text features derived from soft prompts remain close to those from their corresponding hard prompts, preserving initial knowledge and mitigating overfitting. Our method has been validated on 11 datasets, demonstrating evident improvements in few-shot learning, domain generalization, and base-to-new generalization scenarios compared to existing baselines. The code will be available at url{https://anonymous.4open.science/r/mocoop-6387}
Read more9/19/2024
👀
0
Patch-Prompt Aligned Bayesian Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
Xinyang Liu, Dongsheng Wang, Bowei Fang, Miaoge Li, Zhibin Duan, Yishi Xu, Bo Chen, Mingyuan Zhou
For downstream applications of vision-language pre-trained models, there has been significant interest in constructing effective prompts. Existing works on prompt engineering, which either require laborious manual designs or optimize the prompt tuning as a point estimation problem, may fail to describe diverse characteristics of categories and limit their applications. We introduce a Bayesian probabilistic resolution to prompt tuning, where the label-specific stochastic prompts are generated hierarchically by first sampling a latent vector from an underlying distribution and then employing a lightweight generative model. Importantly, we semantically regularize the tuning process by minimizing the statistical distance between the visual patches and linguistic prompts, which pushes the stochastic label representations to faithfully capture diverse visual concepts, instead of overfitting the training categories. We evaluate the effectiveness of our approach on four tasks: few-shot image recognition, base-to-new generalization, dataset transfer learning, and domain shifts. Extensive results over 15 datasets show promising transferability and generalization performance of our proposed model, both quantitatively and qualitatively.
Read more7/2/2024