A tutorial on learning from preferences and choices with Gaussian Processes
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a tutorial on learning from preferences and choices using Gaussian Processes (GPs).
- It covers two main approaches: utility function based learning and preference learning with two-argument functions.
- The paper discusses the advantages and challenges of these methods, as well as their applications in areas like robotics and human-AI interaction.
Plain English Explanation
Gaussian Processes (GPs) are a powerful machine learning tool that can be used to model and learn from preferences and choices. This paper provides a tutorial on two main approaches to using GPs for this purpose.
The first approach is utility function based learning. Here, the goal is to learn a utility function that captures an individual's preferences, based on their choices or feedback. This can be useful in applications like learning human preferences over robot behavior or modeling beliefs and preferences for targeted interventions.
The second approach is preference learning with two-argument functions. In this case, the goal is to learn a function that can directly compare two options and predict which one the individual would prefer. This can be applied to problems like learning optimal policies from observational data or direct Nash optimization for teaching language models.
Both of these approaches have their advantages and challenges, which are discussed in the paper. The key idea is to use GPs to capture the uncertainty and structure in the preference data, which can lead to more robust and interpretable models.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents two main approaches to learning from preferences and choices using Gaussian Processes (GPs).
The first approach is utility function based learning. Here, the goal is to learn a utility function u(x) that captures an individual's preferences over a set of options x. This is done by modeling u(x) as a GP, and then using the individual's choices or feedback to update the GP and infer the underlying utility function.
The second approach is preference learning with two-argument functions. In this case, the goal is to learn a function f(x, y) that can directly compare two options x and y, and predict which one the individual would prefer. This is modeled as a GP over the two-argument function f(x, y), and the GP is updated based on the individual's pairwise preferences.
The paper discusses the advantages and challenges of these two approaches. Utility function based learning can be more interpretable, as it directly models the underlying preferences. However, it can be more challenging to learn, especially when the preference data is noisy or sparse. Preference learning with two-argument functions, on the other hand, can be more flexible and scalable, but may be less interpretable.
The paper also presents various applications of these GP-based preference learning methods, such as learning human preferences over robot behavior, modeling beliefs and preferences for targeted interventions, learning optimal policies from observational data, and direct Nash optimization for teaching language models.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive overview of using Gaussian Processes for learning from preferences and choices, highlighting the strengths and challenges of the two main approaches. However, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential limitations or caveats of these methods.
For example, the paper does not discuss the sensitivity of these GP-based models to the choice of kernel functions or hyperparameters, which can have a significant impact on their performance. Additionally, the paper does not address potential biases or confounding factors in the preference data that could affect the learned models.
Furthermore, the paper focuses primarily on the technical aspects of the methods, and does not provide much discussion on the ethical implications or societal impact of using these preference learning techniques, especially in sensitive domains like human-robot interaction or targeted interventions.
Overall, while the paper provides a solid tutorial on the technical aspects of GP-based preference learning, it could benefit from a more critical examination of the limitations and potential issues with these approaches, as well as a deeper consideration of their real-world applications and implications.
Conclusion
This paper presents a tutorial on two main approaches to learning from preferences and choices using Gaussian Processes (GPs): utility function based learning and preference learning with two-argument functions.
The key idea behind these methods is to leverage the flexibility and uncertainty modeling capabilities of GPs to capture the structure and noise in preference data, which can lead to more robust and interpretable models. The paper discusses the advantages and challenges of each approach, as well as their applications in various domains like robotics and human-AI interaction.
While the paper provides a comprehensive technical overview, it could benefit from a more critical analysis of the potential limitations and ethical considerations of these preference learning techniques. Nonetheless, the tutorial offers valuable insights for researchers and practitioners interested in leveraging GPs for modeling and understanding human preferences and choices.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A tutorial on learning from preferences and choices with Gaussian Processes
Alessio Benavoli, Dario Azzimonti
Preference modelling lies at the intersection of economics, decision theory, machine learning and statistics. By understanding individuals' preferences and how they make choices, we can build products that closely match their expectations, paving the way for more efficient and personalised applications across a wide range of domains. The objective of this tutorial is to present a cohesive and comprehensive framework for preference learning with Gaussian Processes (GPs), demonstrating how to seamlessly incorporate rationality principles (from economics and decision theory) into the learning process. By suitably tailoring the likelihood function, this framework enables the construction of preference learning models that encompass random utility models, limits of discernment, and scenarios with multiple conflicting utilities for both object- and label-preference. This tutorial builds upon established research while simultaneously introducing some novel GP-based models to address specific gaps in the existing literature.
Read more6/4/2024
0
A Tutorial on Gaussian Process Learning-based Model Predictive Control
Jie Wang, Youmin Zhang
This tutorial provides a systematic introduction to Gaussian process learning-based model predictive control (GP-MPC), an advanced approach integrating Gaussian process (GP) with model predictive control (MPC) for enhanced control in complex systems. It begins with GP regression fundamentals, illustrating how it enriches MPC with enhanced predictive accuracy and robust handling of uncertainties. A central contribution of this tutorial is the first detailed, systematic mathematical formulation of GP-MPC in literature, focusing on deriving the approximation of means and variances propagation for GP multi-step predictions. Practical applications in robotics control, such as path-following for mobile robots in challenging terrains and mixed-vehicle platooning, are discussed to demonstrate the real-world effectiveness and adaptability of GP-MPC. This tutorial aims to make GP-MPC accessible to researchers and practitioners, enriching the learning-based control field with in-depth theoretical and practical insights and fostering further innovations in complex system control.
Read more4/8/2024
0
Pareto-Optimal Learning from Preferences with Hidden Context
Ryan Boldi, Li Ding, Lee Spector, Scott Niekum
Ensuring AI models align with human values is essential for their safety and functionality. Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) uses human preferences to achieve this alignment. However, preferences sourced from diverse populations can result in point estimates of human values that may be sub-optimal or unfair to specific groups. We propose Pareto Optimal Preference Learning (POPL), which frames discrepant group preferences as objectives with potential trade-offs, aiming for policies that are Pareto-optimal on the preference dataset. POPL utilizes Lexicase selection, an iterative process to select diverse and Pareto-optimal solutions. Our empirical evaluations demonstrate that POPL surpasses baseline methods in learning sets of reward functions, effectively catering to distinct groups without access to group numbers or membership labels. Furthermore, we illustrate that POPL can serve as a foundation for techniques optimizing specific notions of group fairness, ensuring inclusive and equitable AI model alignment.
Read more6/26/2024
0
Data-Driven Preference Sampling for Pareto Front Learning
Rongguang Ye, Lei Chen, Weiduo Liao, Jinyuan Zhang, Hisao Ishibuchi
Pareto front learning is a technique that introduces preference vectors in a neural network to approximate the Pareto front. Previous Pareto front learning methods have demonstrated high performance in approximating simple Pareto fronts. These methods often sample preference vectors from a fixed Dirichlet distribution. However, no fixed sampling distribution can be adapted to diverse Pareto fronts. Efficiently sampling preference vectors and accurately estimating the Pareto front is a challenge. To address this challenge, we propose a data-driven preference vector sampling framework for Pareto front learning. We utilize the posterior information of the objective functions to adjust the parameters of the sampling distribution flexibly. In this manner, the proposed method can sample preference vectors from the location of the Pareto front with a high probability. Moreover, we design the distribution of the preference vector as a mixture of Dirichlet distributions to improve the performance of the model in disconnected Pareto fronts. Extensive experiments validate the superiority of the proposed method compared with state-of-the-art algorithms.
Read more4/15/2024