Valid Error Bars for Neural Weather Models using Conformal Prediction
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores the use of conformal prediction to obtain valid error bars for neural weather models.
- Conformal prediction is a framework for constructing prediction sets that are valid, meaning they contain the true value with a pre-specified probability.
- The authors investigate the application of conformal prediction to weather forecasting, where accurate uncertainty quantification is crucial.
Plain English Explanation
Neural networks have become powerful tools for weather forecasting, but quantifying the uncertainty in their predictions is challenging. Conformal prediction is a statistical framework that can be used to construct prediction intervals that are guaranteed to contain the true value with a specified probability, even if the underlying model is misspecified.
In this paper, the authors explore the use of conformal prediction to obtain valid error bars for neural weather models. They demonstrate that conformal prediction can provide reliable uncertainty estimates, which are essential for making well-informed decisions based on weather forecasts. The authors also discuss methods for detecting out-of-distribution samples and techniques for interpreting the predictions of neural weather models.
Overall, this research highlights the potential of conformal prediction to improve the trustworthiness and transparency of neural weather models, which could have significant implications for fields like agriculture, transportation, and disaster management that rely on accurate weather forecasting.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a study on the use of conformal prediction to obtain valid error bars for neural weather models. Conformal prediction is a framework for constructing prediction sets that are valid, meaning they contain the true value with a pre-specified probability, even if the underlying model is misspecified.
The authors first provide an overview of conformal prediction and its properties, including conditional validity and heteroskedastic conformal regression. They then describe how conformal prediction can be applied to neural weather models, focusing on the challenges of obtaining well-calibrated uncertainty estimates in this domain.
The paper presents experiments on several weather forecasting tasks, where the authors compare the performance of conformal prediction with traditional error bars obtained from the neural network outputs. The results demonstrate that conformal prediction can provide more reliable uncertainty estimates, which are crucial for making informed decisions based on weather forecasts.
The authors also discuss methods for detecting out-of-distribution samples and techniques for interpreting the predictions of neural weather models, which can further enhance the trustworthiness and transparency of the proposed approach.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a promising approach for obtaining valid error bars for neural weather models using conformal prediction. The authors have carefully designed their experiments and provided a thorough technical explanation of the methods.
One potential limitation of the study is the focus on a limited number of weather forecasting tasks. It would be valuable to see the performance of the conformal prediction approach on a broader range of weather-related problems and datasets to better understand its generalizability.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed discussion of the computational complexity and runtime implications of the conformal prediction framework, which could be an important consideration for real-world weather forecasting applications that require rapid predictions.
Further research could also explore the integration of conformal prediction with other uncertainty quantification techniques, such as Bayesian neural networks, to potentially enhance the robustness and flexibility of the uncertainty estimates.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel application of conformal prediction to obtain valid error bars for neural weather models. The results demonstrate the potential of this approach to improve the trustworthiness and transparency of weather forecasting systems, which could have significant implications for a wide range of industries and applications that rely on accurate and reliable weather information.
The authors have provided a solid technical foundation and highlighted important directions for future research, such as exploring the generalizability of the method and investigating the computational efficiency. Overall, this work represents a valuable contribution to the field of uncertainty quantification for weather modeling and forecasting.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Valid Error Bars for Neural Weather Models using Conformal Prediction
Vignesh Gopakumar, Joel Oskarrson, Ander Gray, Lorenzo Zanisi, Stanislas Pamela, Daniel Giles, Matt Kusner, Marc Deisenroth
Neural weather models have shown immense potential as inexpensive and accurate alternatives to physics-based models. However, most models trained to perform weather forecasting do not quantify the uncertainty associated with their forecasts. This limits the trust in the model and the usefulness of the forecasts. In this work we construct and formalise a conformal prediction framework as a post-processing method for estimating this uncertainty. The method is model-agnostic and gives calibrated error bounds for all variables, lead times and spatial locations. No modifications are required to the model and the computational cost is negligible compared to model training. We demonstrate the usefulness of the conformal prediction framework on a limited area neural weather model for the Nordic region. We further explore the advantages of the framework for deterministic and probabilistic models.
Read more6/21/2024
0
Uncertainty Quantification of Pre-Trained and Fine-Tuned Surrogate Models using Conformal Prediction
Vignesh Gopakumar, Ander Gray, Joel Oskarsson, Lorenzo Zanisi, Stanislas Pamela, Daniel Giles, Matt Kusner, Marc Peter Deisenroth
Data-driven surrogate models have shown immense potential as quick, inexpensive approximations to complex numerical and experimental modelling tasks. However, most surrogate models characterising physical systems do not quantify their uncertainty, rendering their predictions unreliable, and needing further validation. Though Bayesian approximations offer some solace in estimating the error associated with these models, they cannot provide they cannot provide guarantees, and the quality of their inferences depends on the availability of prior information and good approximations to posteriors for complex problems. This is particularly pertinent to multi-variable or spatio-temporal problems. Our work constructs and formalises a conformal prediction framework that satisfies marginal coverage for spatio-temporal predictions in a model-agnostic manner, requiring near-zero computational costs. The paper provides an extensive empirical study of the application of the framework to ascertain valid error bars that provide guaranteed coverage across the surrogate model's domain of operation. The application scope of our work extends across a large range of spatio-temporal models, ranging from solving partial differential equations to weather forecasting. Through the applications, the paper looks at providing statistically valid error bars for deterministic models, as well as crafting guarantees to the error bars of probabilistic models. The paper concludes with a viable conformal prediction formalisation that provides guaranteed coverage of the surrogate model, regardless of model architecture, and its training regime and is unbothered by the curse of dimensionality.
Read more8/20/2024
🔮
0
A comparative study of conformal prediction methods for valid uncertainty quantification in machine learning
Nicolas Dewolf
In the past decades, most work in the area of data analysis and machine learning was focused on optimizing predictive models and getting better results than what was possible with existing models. To what extent the metrics with which such improvements were measured were accurately capturing the intended goal, whether the numerical differences in the resulting values were significant, or whether uncertainty played a role in this study and if it should have been taken into account, was of secondary importance. Whereas probability theory, be it frequentist or Bayesian, used to be the gold standard in science before the advent of the supercomputer, it was quickly replaced in favor of black box models and sheer computing power because of their ability to handle large data sets. This evolution sadly happened at the expense of interpretability and trustworthiness. However, while people are still trying to improve the predictive power of their models, the community is starting to realize that for many applications it is not so much the exact prediction that is of importance, but rather the variability or uncertainty. The work in this dissertation tries to further the quest for a world where everyone is aware of uncertainty, of how important it is and how to embrace it instead of fearing it. A specific, though general, framework that allows anyone to obtain accurate uncertainty estimates is singled out and analysed. Certain aspects and applications of the framework -- dubbed `conformal prediction' -- are studied in detail. Whereas many approaches to uncertainty quantification make strong assumptions about the data, conformal prediction is, at the time of writing, the only framework that deserves the title `distribution-free'. No parametric assumptions have to be made and the nonparametric results also hold without having to resort to the law of large numbers in the asymptotic regime.
Read more5/6/2024
0
Onboard Out-of-Calibration Detection of Deep Learning Models using Conformal Prediction
Protim Bhattacharjee, Peter Jung
The black box nature of deep learning models complicate their usage in critical applications such as remote sensing. Conformal prediction is a method to ensure trust in such scenarios. Subject to data exchangeability, conformal prediction provides finite sample coverage guarantees in the form of a prediction set that is guaranteed to contain the true class within a user defined error rate. In this letter we show that conformal prediction algorithms are related to the uncertainty of the deep learning model and that this relation can be used to detect if the deep learning model is out-of-calibration. Popular classification models like Resnet50, Densenet161, InceptionV3, and MobileNetV2 are applied on remote sensing datasets such as the EuroSAT to demonstrate how under noisy scenarios the model outputs become untrustworthy. Furthermore an out-of-calibration detection procedure relating the model uncertainty and the average size of the conformal prediction set is presented.
Read more5/7/2024