Understanding and mitigating difficulties in posterior predictive evaluation

Read original: arXiv:2405.19747 - Published 5/31/2024 by Abhinav Agrawal, Justin Domke

🤔

Overview

Predictive posterior densities (PPDs) are important in approximate Bayesian inference
Simple Monte Carlo (MC) sampling to estimate PPDs can result in extremely low signal-to-noise ratios (SNR)
Analysis shows SNR decays exponentially as mismatch between training and test data increases, dimensionality of latent space increases, or size of test data relative to training data increases
Proposed solution is to use importance sampling with a proposal distribution optimized for high SNR at test time

Plain English Explanation

Bayesian inference is a way of drawing conclusions from data using probability. In Bayesian methods, we start with some initial beliefs about the parameters of a model (prior distribution), then update those beliefs based on observed data to get a posterior distribution. From the posterior, we can make predictions about future data, which are called predictive posterior densities (PPDs).

Typically, PPDs are estimated using a simple technique called Monte Carlo sampling, where we generate many random samples from the posterior distribution and average them. However, the researchers found that this can result in estimates with an extremely low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) - meaning the useful information is drowned out by random noise.

The researchers analyzed this problem in depth and found that the SNR decays exponentially as:

The mismatch between the training data and the new test data increases
The dimensionality of the latent (hidden) variables in the model increases
The size of the test data set becomes smaller relative to the training data

To address this, the researchers propose using a more sophisticated technique called importance sampling. This involves generating samples from a specially-designed "proposal" distribution that is optimized to have a high SNR at test time. This approach can greatly improve the quality of the PPD estimates compared to basic Monte Carlo sampling.

Technical Explanation

The key issue the researchers identified is that simple Monte Carlo (MC) sampling to estimate predictive posterior densities (PPDs) can result in estimators with extremely low signal-to-noise ratios (SNR).

Through analysis, they show that the SNR of MC-based PPD estimators decays exponentially as:

There is greater mismatch between the training data distribution and the test data distribution see related work
The dimensionality of the latent space increases
The size of the test data set becomes smaller relative to the training data

They extend this analysis from exact Bayesian inference to the approximate inference setting, which is more commonly used in practice.

To address the low SNR problem, the researchers propose replacing simple MC sampling with importance sampling using a proposal distribution that is optimized at test time to maximize a variational proxy for the SNR. This technique is shown to yield greatly improved PPD estimates compared to basic MC sampling.

Critical Analysis

The researchers provide a thorough mathematical analysis of the SNR issues with basic MC-based PPD estimation, grounding their findings in both the exact Bayesian and approximate inference settings. This provides a strong theoretical foundation for understanding the limitations of simple sampling approaches.

However, the paper does not explore the practical implications or real-world performance impacts of the low SNR problem. While the proposed importance sampling solution is shown to improve estimation quality, the researchers do not quantify the actual benefits in terms of downstream task performance, computational efficiency, or other meaningful metrics.

Additionally, the optimization of the importance sampling proposal distribution is presented as a black-box variational procedure, without much insight into the properties or characteristics of the resulting distributions. Further work to better understand and potentially constrain the proposal distributions could lead to even more robust and interpretable PPD estimation.

Overall, this is a technically solid piece of research that identifies an important problem in Bayesian modeling and proposes a promising solution. However, more empirical validation and practical analysis would strengthen the impact and applicability of the findings.

Conclusion

This research paper tackles a fundamental challenge in approximate Bayesian inference - the problem of estimating predictive posterior densities (PPDs) with high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The key insights are:

Simple Monte Carlo sampling to estimate PPDs can result in estimators with extremely low SNR, due to factors like mismatch between training and test data, high-dimensional latent spaces, and small test datasets.
A more sophisticated importance sampling approach, with the proposal distribution optimized for high SNR at test time, can greatly improve the quality of PPD estimates compared to basic Monte Carlo sampling.

These findings have important implications for Bayesian modeling and prediction in a wide range of applications, from machine learning to scientific inference. By addressing the SNR challenges in PPD estimation, the proposed techniques can lead to more robust and reliable Bayesian forecasting and decision-making.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤔

Understanding and mitigating difficulties in posterior predictive evaluation

Abhinav Agrawal, Justin Domke

Predictive posterior densities (PPDs) are of interest in approximate Bayesian inference. Typically, these are estimated by simple Monte Carlo (MC) averages using samples from the approximate posterior. We observe that the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of such estimators can be extremely low. An analysis for exact inference reveals SNR decays exponentially as there is an increase in (a) the mismatch between training and test data, (b) the dimensionality of the latent space, or (c) the size of the test data relative to the training data. Further analysis extends these results to approximate inference. To remedy the low SNR problem, we propose replacing simple MC sampling with importance sampling using a proposal distribution optimized at test time on a variational proxy for the SNR and demonstrate that this yields greatly improved estimates.

5/31/2024

🎯

Provable Probabilistic Imaging using Score-Based Generative Priors

Yu Sun, Zihui Wu, Yifan Chen, Berthy T. Feng, Katherine L. Bouman

Estimating high-quality images while also quantifying their uncertainty are two desired features in an image reconstruction algorithm for solving ill-posed inverse problems. In this paper, we propose plug-and-play Monte Carlo (PMC) as a principled framework for characterizing the space of possible solutions to a general inverse problem. PMC is able to incorporate expressive score-based generative priors for high-quality image reconstruction while also performing uncertainty quantification via posterior sampling. In particular, we develop two PMC algorithms that can be viewed as the sampling analogues of the traditional plug-and-play priors (PnP) and regularization by denoising (RED) algorithms. To improve the sampling efficiency, we introduce weighted annealing into these PMC algorithms, further developing two additional annealed PMC algorithms (APMC). We establish a theoretical analysis for characterizing the convergence behavior of PMC algorithms. Our analysis provides non-asymptotic stationarity guarantees in terms of the Fisher information, fully compatible with the joint presence of weighted annealing, potentially non-log-concave likelihoods, and imperfect score networks. We demonstrate the performance of the PMC algorithms on multiple representative inverse problems with both linear and nonlinear forward models. Experimental results show that PMC significantly improves reconstruction quality and enables high-fidelity uncertainty quantification.

8/29/2024

Sparse Inducing Points in Deep Gaussian Processes: Enhancing Modeling with Denoising Diffusion Variational Inference

Jian Xu, Delu Zeng, John Paisley

Deep Gaussian processes (DGPs) provide a robust paradigm for Bayesian deep learning. In DGPs, a set of sparse integration locations called inducing points are selected to approximate the posterior distribution of the model. This is done to reduce computational complexity and improve model efficiency. However, inferring the posterior distribution of inducing points is not straightforward. Traditional variational inference approaches to posterior approximation often lead to significant bias. To address this issue, we propose an alternative method called Denoising Diffusion Variational Inference (DDVI) that uses a denoising diffusion stochastic differential equation (SDE) to generate posterior samples of inducing variables. We rely on score matching methods for denoising diffusion model to approximate score functions with a neural network. Furthermore, by combining classical mathematical theory of SDEs with the minimization of KL divergence between the approximate and true processes, we propose a novel explicit variational lower bound for the marginal likelihood function of DGP. Through experiments on various datasets and comparisons with baseline methods, we empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of DDVI for posterior inference of inducing points for DGP models.

7/25/2024

Invariant Probabilistic Prediction

Alexander Henzi, Xinwei Shen, Michael Law, Peter Buhlmann

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in statistical methods that exhibit robust performance under distribution changes between training and test data. While most of the related research focuses on point predictions with the squared error loss, this article turns the focus towards probabilistic predictions, which aim to comprehensively quantify the uncertainty of an outcome variable given covariates. Within a causality-inspired framework, we investigate the invariance and robustness of probabilistic predictions with respect to proper scoring rules. We show that arbitrary distribution shifts do not, in general, admit invariant and robust probabilistic predictions, in contrast to the setting of point prediction. We illustrate how to choose evaluation metrics and restrict the class of distribution shifts to allow for identifiability and invariance in the prototypical Gaussian heteroscedastic linear model. Motivated by these findings, we propose a method to yield invariant probabilistic predictions, called IPP, and study the consistency of the underlying parameters. Finally, we demonstrate the empirical performance of our proposed procedure on simulated as well as on single-cell data.

6/18/2024