Understanding Routing-Induced Censorship Changes Globally
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores how changes in internet routing can impact global internet censorship.
- The researchers investigated how shifts in network routing and internet infrastructure can lead to changes in which websites and online content are blocked or restricted in different countries.
- The study analyzed real-world data on internet censorship and routing changes to understand the connection between these two factors.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how the way internet traffic is routed around the world can affect internet censorship in different countries. Internet censorship is when governments or organizations block people from accessing certain websites or online content. The researchers investigated how changes in the underlying infrastructure and pathways that internet data travels through can lead to changes in what gets censored.
They analyzed real data on both internet censorship and how internet traffic is routed globally. This allowed them to understand the relationship between routing changes and shifts in what content is restricted or blocked in different parts of the world. By exploring this connection, the study provides insights into how the physical structure of the internet can impact digital freedoms and access to information online.
Technical Explanation
The paper examines the relationship between internet routing changes and changes in global internet censorship. The researchers collected data on censorship events and internet routing shifts over time, then analyzed how these two factors were connected.
They found that changes in how internet traffic is routed, including the addition or removal of certain network providers or pathways, can lead to modifications in what content is blocked or restricted in different regions. This suggests the physical infrastructure underpinning the internet plays a key role in determining the scope and impacts of internet censorship.
The study leveraged a variety of data sources, including censorship measurement platforms and internet routing observation points, to build a comprehensive dataset covering censorship and routing changes globally. Statistical analysis of this data revealed the strong linkages between the two phenomena.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable empirical evidence of the connections between internet routing and censorship. However, it acknowledges some limitations in the data and analysis. For example, the censorship measurements may not capture all instances of blocking, and the routing data has gaps in coverage for certain regions.
Additionally, while the study demonstrates the relationship between routing changes and censorship shifts, it does not fully unpack the exact mechanisms driving this dynamic. Further research would be needed to more deeply understand the technical and political factors underpinning how routing infrastructure influences censorship practices.
Nevertheless, this work represents an important step in measuring the interplay between internet architecture and online freedoms. By shedding light on this connection, it highlights the need to consider the physical infrastructure of the internet when assessing and addressing issues of digital censorship and access.
Conclusion
This paper makes a significant contribution by demonstrating how changes in the underlying routing and network infrastructure of the internet can impact global internet censorship. The findings underscore the importance of considering the physical layer of the internet when studying and addressing digital rights and access to information online.
By revealing the linkages between routing shifts and censorship changes, this research provides valuable insights that can inform efforts to measure internet routing from the most valuable vantage points and develop more resilient, open internet architectures. Ultimately, this work highlights the intricate relationship between the physical and digital realms of the internet.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Understanding Routing-Induced Censorship Changes Globally
Abhishek Bhaskar, Paul Pearce
Internet censorship is pervasive, with significant effort dedicated to understanding what is censored, and where. Prior censorship work however have identified significant inconsistencies in their results; experiments show unexplained non-determinism thought to be caused by censor load, end-host geographic diversity, or incomplete censorship -- inconsistencies which impede reliable, repeatable and correct understanding of global censorship. In this work we investigate the extent to which Equal-cost Multi-path (ECMP) routing is the cause for these inconsistencies, developing methods to measure and compensate for them. We find ECMP routing significantly changes observed censorship across protocols, censor mechanisms, and in 17 countries. We identify that previously observed non-determinism or regional variations are attributable to measurements between fixed end-hosts taking different routes based on Flow-ID; i.e., choice of intra-subnet source IP or ephemeral source port leads to differences in observed censorship. To achieve this we develop new route-stable censorship measurement methods that allow consistent measurement of DNS, HTTP, and HTTPS censorship. We find ECMP routing yields censorship changes across 42% of IPs and 51% of ASes, but that impact is not uniform. We identify numerous causes of the behavior, ranging from likely failed infrastructure, to routes to the same end-host taking geographically diverse paths which experience differences in censorship en-route. Finally, we explore our results in the context of prior global measurement studies, exploring first the applicability of our findings to prior observed variations, and then demonstrating how specific experiments from two studies could be impacted by, and specific results are explainable by, ECMP routing. Our work points to methods for improving future studies, reducing inconsistencies and increasing repeatability.
Read more6/28/2024
📉
0
Pathfinder: Exploring Path Diversity for Assessing Internet Censorship Inconsistency
Xiaoqin Liang, Guannan Liu, Lin Jin, Shuai Hao, Haining Wang
Internet censorship is typically enforced by authorities to achieve information control for a certain group of Internet users. So far existing censorship studies have primarily focused on country-level characterization because (1) in many cases, censorship is enabled by governments with nationwide policies and (2) it is usually hard to control how the probing packets are routed to trigger censorship in different networks inside a country. However, the deployment and implementation of censorship could be highly diverse at the ISP level. In this paper, we investigate Internet censorship from a different perspective by scrutinizing the diverse censorship deployment inside a country. Specifically, by leveraging an end-to-end measurement framework, we deploy multiple geo-distributed back-end control servers to explore various paths from one single vantage point. The generated traffic with the same domain but different control servers' IPs could be forced to traverse different transit networks, thereby being examined by different censorship devices if present. Through our large-scale experiments and in-depth investigation, we reveal that the diversity of Internet censorship caused by different routing paths inside a country is prevalent, implying that (1) the implementations of centralized censorship are commonly incomplete or flawed and (2) decentralized censorship is also common. Moreover, we identify that different hosting platforms also result in inconsistent censorship activities due to different peering relationships with the ISPs in a country. Finally, we present extensive case studies in detail to illustrate the configurations that lead to censorship inconsistency and explore the causes.
Read more7/8/2024
0
Charting Censorship Resilience and Global Internet Reachability: A Quantitative Approach
Marina Ivanovi'c, Franc{c}ois Wirz, Jordi Subir`a Nieto, Adrian Perrig
Internet censorship and global Internet reachability are prevalent topics of today's Internet. Nonetheless, the impact of network topology and Internet architecture to these aspects of the Internet is under-explored. With the goal of informing policy discussions with an objective basis, we present an approach for evaluating both censorship resilience and global Internet reachability using quantitative network metrics, which are applicable to current BGP/IP networks and also to alternative Internet network architectures. We devise and instantiate the metric on the network topology of multiple countries, comparing the BGP/IP network, an overlay network using a waypoint mechanism for circumventing undesired nodes, and the path-aware Internet architecture SCION. The novelty of the approach resides in providing a metric enabling the analysis of these aspects of the Internet at the routing level, taking into account the innate properties of the routing protocol and architecture. We demonstrate that the Internet topology matters, and strongly influences both censorship resilience and reachability to the global Internet. Finally, we argue that access to multiple paths accompanied with path-awareness could enable a higher level of censorship resilience compared to the current Internet, and reduce the centralization of Internet routing.
Read more7/19/2024
0
Reasoning About Internet Connectivity
Guillermo Baltra, Tarang Saluja, Yuri Pradkin, John Heidemann
Innovation in the Internet requires a global Internet core to enable communication between users in ISPs and services in the cloud. Today, this Internet core is challenged by partial reachability: political pressure threatens fragmentation by nationality, architectural changes such as carrier-grade NAT make connectivity conditional, and operational problems and commercial disputes make reachability incomplete for months. We assert that partial reachability is a fundamental part of the Internet core. While other studies address partial reachability, this paper is the first to provide a conceptual definition of the Internet core so we can reason about reachability from principles first. Following the Internet design, our definition is guided by reachability, not authority. Its corollaries are peninsulas: persistent regions of partial connectivity; and islands: when networks are partitioned from the Internet core. We show that the concept of peninsulas and islands can improve existing measurement systems. In one example, they show that RIPE's DNSmon suffers misconfiguration and persistent network problems that are important, but risk obscuring operationally important connectivity changes because they are $5times$ to $9.7times$ larger. Our evaluation also informs policy questions, showing no single country or organization can unilaterally control the Internet core.
Read more7/22/2024