Unified Interpretation of Smoothing Methods for Negative Sampling Loss Functions in Knowledge Graph Embedding
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Explains a unified interpretation of smoothing methods for negative sampling loss functions in knowledge graph embedding
- Provides a theoretical analysis and understanding of different negative sampling loss functions
- Offers insights into the relationship between various loss functions and their properties
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a unified interpretation of smoothing methods for negative sampling loss functions in knowledge graph embedding. Knowledge graphs are structured datasets that represent real-world entities and the relationships between them. Embedding these knowledge graphs into a vector space is a common technique used in machine learning tasks.
One key aspect of knowledge graph embedding is the use of negative sampling, which involves selecting "negative" examples (i.e., pairs of entities that are not actually related) to train the model. The choice of negative sampling loss function can have a significant impact on the performance of the knowledge graph embedding model.
The paper provides a unified theoretical interpretation of various negative sampling loss functions, explaining their underlying properties and relationships. This understanding can help researchers and practitioners make more informed decisions when selecting the appropriate loss function for their specific knowledge graph embedding tasks.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a unified interpretation of smoothing methods for negative sampling loss functions in knowledge graph embedding. It analyzes different loss functions, including the standard negative sampling loss, the self-adversarial negative sampling loss, and the noise contrastive estimation loss.
The authors show that these loss functions can be interpreted as different forms of smoothing methods, which aim to reduce the impact of outliers and improve the robustness of the embedding model. They provide a theoretical analysis of the properties of these smoothing methods and their implications for knowledge graph embedding.
The paper also discusses the relationship between the different loss functions and their ability to capture the inherent structure of the knowledge graph. This understanding can help researchers and practitioners select the appropriate loss function for their specific knowledge graph embedding tasks, based on the desired properties and performance requirements.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and insightful analysis of negative sampling loss functions in knowledge graph embedding. However, the authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research:
- The analysis is primarily theoretical and could benefit from additional empirical validation across a wider range of knowledge graph datasets and tasks.
- The paper does not explore the impact of other factors, such as the choice of embedding model architecture or hyperparameter tuning, on the performance of the different loss functions.
- The authors suggest that exploring alternative smoothing methods or hybrid approaches could lead to further improvements in the robustness and performance of knowledge graph embedding models.
Overall, the paper offers a valuable contribution to the understanding of negative sampling loss functions and their role in knowledge graph embedding. The insights provided can inform future research and practical applications in this field.
Conclusion
This paper presents a unified interpretation of smoothing methods for negative sampling loss functions in knowledge graph embedding. By analyzing the theoretical properties of different loss functions, the authors provide a deeper understanding of their underlying relationships and implications for knowledge graph embedding tasks.
The insights gained from this research can help researchers and practitioners make more informed decisions when selecting the appropriate loss function for their knowledge graph embedding models, based on the desired properties and performance requirements. This can lead to improvements in the robustness and effectiveness of knowledge graph embeddings, with potential applications in areas such as knowledge-based reasoning, recommendation systems, and natural language processing.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Unified Interpretation of Smoothing Methods for Negative Sampling Loss Functions in Knowledge Graph Embedding
Xincan Feng, Hidetaka Kamigaito, Katsuhiko Hayashi, Taro Watanabe
Knowledge Graphs (KGs) are fundamental resources in knowledge-intensive tasks in NLP. Due to the limitation of manually creating KGs, KG Completion (KGC) has an important role in automatically completing KGs by scoring their links with KG Embedding (KGE). To handle many entities in training, KGE relies on Negative Sampling (NS) loss that can reduce the computational cost by sampling. Since the appearance frequencies for each link are at most one in KGs, sparsity is an essential and inevitable problem. The NS loss is no exception. As a solution, the NS loss in KGE relies on smoothing methods like Self-Adversarial Negative Sampling (SANS) and subsampling. However, it is uncertain what kind of smoothing method is suitable for this purpose due to the lack of theoretical understanding. This paper provides theoretical interpretations of the smoothing methods for the NS loss in KGE and induces a new NS loss, Triplet Adaptive Negative Sampling (TANS), that can cover the characteristics of the conventional smoothing methods. Experimental results of TransE, DistMult, ComplEx, RotatE, HAKE, and HousE on FB15k-237, WN18RR, and YAGO3-10 datasets and their sparser subsets show the soundness of our interpretation and performance improvement by our TANS.
Read more7/8/2024
🖼️
0
Model-based Subsampling for Knowledge Graph Completion
Xincan Feng, Hidetaka Kamigaito, Katsuhiko Hayashi, Taro Watanabe
Subsampling is effective in Knowledge Graph Embedding (KGE) for reducing overfitting caused by the sparsity in Knowledge Graph (KG) datasets. However, current subsampling approaches consider only frequencies of queries that consist of entities and their relations. Thus, the existing subsampling potentially underestimates the appearance probabilities of infrequent queries even if the frequencies of their entities or relations are high. To address this problem, we propose Model-based Subsampling (MBS) and Mixed Subsampling (MIX) to estimate their appearance probabilities through predictions of KGE models. Evaluation results on datasets FB15k-237, WN18RR, and YAGO3-10 showed that our proposed subsampling methods actually improved the KG completion performances for popular KGE models, RotatE, TransE, HAKE, ComplEx, and DistMult.
Read more4/15/2024
0
From Overfitting to Robustness: Quantity, Quality, and Variety Oriented Negative Sample Selection in Graph Contrastive Learning
Adnan Ali, Jinlong Li, Huanhuan Chen, Ali Kashif Bashir
Graph contrastive learning (GCL) aims to contrast positive-negative counterparts to learn the node embeddings, whereas graph data augmentation methods are employed to generate these positive-negative samples. The variation, quantity, and quality of negative samples compared to positive samples play crucial roles in learning meaningful embeddings for node classification downstream tasks. Less variation, excessive quantity, and low-quality negative samples cause the model to be overfitted for particular nodes, resulting in less robust models. To solve the overfitting problem in the GCL paradigm, this study proposes a novel Cumulative Sample Selection (CSS) algorithm by comprehensively considering negative samples' quality, variations, and quantity. Initially, three negative sample pools are constructed: easy, medium, and hard negative samples, which contain 25%, 50%, and 25% of the total available negative samples, respectively. Then, 10% negative samples are selected from each of these three negative sample pools for training the model. After that, a decision agent module evaluates model training results and decides whether to explore more negative samples from three negative sample pools by increasing the ratio or keep exploiting the current sampling ratio. The proposed algorithm is integrated into a proposed graph contrastive learning framework named NegAmplify. NegAmplify is compared with the SOTA methods on nine graph node classification datasets, with seven achieving better node classification accuracy with up to 2.86% improvement.
Read more6/24/2024
0
Exploiting Large Language Models Capabilities for Question Answer-Driven Knowledge Graph Completion Across Static and Temporal Domains
Rui Yang, Jiahao Zhu, Jianping Man, Li Fang, Yi Zhou
Knowledge graph completion (KGC) aims to identify missing triples in a knowledge graph (KG). This is typically achieved through tasks such as link prediction and instance completion. However, these methods often focus on either static knowledge graphs (SKGs) or temporal knowledge graphs (TKGs), addressing only within-scope triples. This paper introduces a new generative completion framework called Generative Subgraph-based KGC (GS-KGC). GS-KGC employs a question-answering format to directly generate target entities, addressing the challenge of questions having multiple possible answers. We propose a strategy that extracts subgraphs centered on entities and relationships within the KG, from which negative samples and neighborhood information are separately obtained to address the one-to-many problem. Our method generates negative samples using known facts to facilitate the discovery of new information. Furthermore, we collect and refine neighborhood path data of known entities, providing contextual information to enhance reasoning in large language models (LLMs). Our experiments evaluated the proposed method on four SKGs and two TKGs, achieving state-of-the-art Hits@1 metrics on five datasets. Analysis of the results shows that GS-KGC can discover new triples within existing KGs and generate new facts beyond the closed KG, effectively bridging the gap between closed-world and open-world KGC.
Read more8/21/2024