Unknown Script: Impact of Script on Cross-Lingual Transfer

Read original: arXiv:2404.18810 - Published 5/8/2024 by Wondimagegnhue Tsegaye Tufa, Ilia Markov, Piek Vossen
Total Score

0

🔄

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper examines the impact of script (writing system) on cross-lingual transfer, which is the process of applying knowledge gained from one language to improve performance on another language.
  • The researchers investigate how the choice of script (e.g., Latin, Cyrillic, Chinese characters) affects the ability to transfer language models across languages.
  • They conduct experiments on a variety of natural language processing tasks, including machine translation, named entity recognition, and text classification, to understand the role of script in cross-lingual transfer.

Plain English Explanation

When you want to use a language model trained on one language (e.g., English) to work on another language (e.g., Russian), this is called "cross-lingual transfer". The researchers behind this paper wanted to understand how the writing system, or "script", of a language affects this process.

For example, English uses the Latin alphabet, while Russian uses the Cyrillic alphabet. The researchers tested whether a model trained on English would work better on a language that also uses the Latin alphabet (like Spanish) compared to a language that uses a different script (like Russian).

They looked at this for different natural language processing tasks, like translating text, identifying named entities, and classifying text. The idea was to understand how the choice of script impacts the ability to transfer knowledge from one language to another.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted a series of experiments to measure the impact of script on cross-lingual transfer. They evaluated performance on various natural language processing tasks, including machine translation, named entity recognition, and text classification.

For each task, they trained models on a source language and then tested the models' ability to perform well on a target language. By comparing performance across language pairs that share the same script versus those with different scripts, they were able to isolate the effect of script on cross-lingual transfer.

The results showed that script plays a significant role in determining the effectiveness of cross-lingual transfer. Models tended to perform better when the source and target languages shared the same script, as the underlying writing system facilitated the transfer of learned features and representations.

Interestingly, the researchers also found that the degree of script similarity (e.g., Latin vs. Cyrillic vs. Chinese characters) influenced the magnitude of the cross-lingual transfer effect. Languages with more closely related scripts exhibited stronger transfer performance than those with more dissimilar scripts.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and rigorous examination of the impact of script on cross-lingual transfer. The experimental design and evaluation across multiple tasks lend credibility to the findings. However, some potential limitations and areas for further research are worth considering:

  • The study focuses on a relatively limited set of language pairs and scripts. Expanding the analysis to a broader range of languages, including less-resourced and typologically diverse languages, could provide additional insights.
  • The paper does not delve into the underlying mechanisms by which script influences cross-lingual transfer. Further research could explore the specific linguistic and cognitive factors that drive these effects.
  • The experiments were conducted on standard natural language processing tasks, but the implications for real-world applications, such as multilingual digital assistants or translation systems, could be further explored.

Despite these potential avenues for future work, the paper makes a valuable contribution to our understanding of the role of script in cross-lingual transfer, a crucial consideration for the development of robust and inclusive natural language processing systems.

Conclusion

This study illuminates the significant impact of script on cross-lingual transfer, a fundamental concept in the field of natural language processing. The findings suggest that the choice of writing system plays a crucial role in determining the effectiveness of transferring knowledge from one language to another.

The implications of this research extend beyond academic pursuits, as it informs the development of multilingual language models and applications that can seamlessly operate across diverse linguistic landscapes. By understanding the script-driven nuances of cross-lingual transfer, researchers and practitioners can build more inclusive and effective natural language processing systems that better serve the needs of a globally connected world.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🔄

Total Score

0

Unknown Script: Impact of Script on Cross-Lingual Transfer

Wondimagegnhue Tsegaye Tufa, Ilia Markov, Piek Vossen

Cross-lingual transfer has become an effective way of transferring knowledge between languages. In this paper, we explore an often overlooked aspect in this domain: the influence of the source language of a language model on language transfer performance. We consider a case where the target language and its script are not part of the pre-trained model. We conduct a series of experiments on monolingual and multilingual models that are pre-trained on different tokenization methods to determine factors that affect cross-lingual transfer to a new language with a unique script. Our findings reveal the importance of the tokenizer as a stronger factor than the shared script, language similarity, and model size.

Read more

5/8/2024

🔄

Total Score

0

Measuring Cross-lingual Transfer in Bytes

Leandro Rodrigues de Souza, Thales Sales Almeida, Roberto Lotufo, Rodrigo Nogueira

Multilingual pretraining has been a successful solution to the challenges posed by the lack of resources for languages. These models can transfer knowledge to target languages with minimal or no examples. Recent research suggests that monolingual models also have a similar capability, but the mechanisms behind this transfer remain unclear. Some studies have explored factors like language contamination and syntactic similarity. An emerging line of research suggests that the representations learned by language models contain two components: a language-specific and a language-agnostic component. The latter is responsible for transferring a more universal knowledge. However, there is a lack of comprehensive exploration of these properties across diverse target languages. To investigate this hypothesis, we conducted an experiment inspired by the work on the Scaling Laws for Transfer. We measured the amount of data transferred from a source language to a target language and found that models initialized from diverse languages perform similarly to a target language in a cross-lingual setting. This was surprising because the amount of data transferred to 10 diverse target languages, such as Spanish, Korean, and Finnish, was quite similar. We also found evidence that this transfer is not related to language contamination or language proximity, which strengthens the hypothesis that the model also relies on language-agnostic knowledge. Our experiments have opened up new possibilities for measuring how much data represents the language-agnostic representations learned during pretraining.

Read more

4/15/2024

TransliCo: A Contrastive Learning Framework to Address the Script Barrier in Multilingual Pretrained Language Models
Total Score

0

TransliCo: A Contrastive Learning Framework to Address the Script Barrier in Multilingual Pretrained Language Models

Yihong Liu, Chunlan Ma, Haotian Ye, Hinrich Schutze

The world's more than 7000 languages are written in at least 293 scripts. Due to various reasons, many closely related languages use different scripts, which poses a difficulty for multilingual pretrained language models (mPLMs) in learning crosslingual knowledge through lexical overlap. As a consequence, mPLMs are faced with a script barrier: representations from different scripts are located in different subspaces, which can result in crosslingual transfer involving languages of different scripts performing suboptimally. To address this problem, we propose TransliCo, a framework that optimizes the Transliteration Contrastive Modeling (TCM) objective to fine-tune an mPLM by contrasting sentences in its training data and their transliterations in a unified script (in our case Latin), which enhances uniformity in the representation space for different scripts. Using Glot500-m, an mPLM pretrained on over 500 languages, as our source model, we fine-tune it on a small portion (5%) of its training data, and refer to the resulting model as Furina. We show that Furina not only better aligns representations from distinct scripts but also outperforms the original Glot500-m on various zero-shot crosslingual transfer tasks. Additionally, we achieve consistent improvement in a case study on the Indic group where the languages exhibit areal features but use different scripts. We make our code and models publicly available.

Read more

5/24/2024

🔄

Total Score

0

An Efficient Approach for Studying Cross-Lingual Transfer in Multilingual Language Models

Fahim Faisal, Antonios Anastasopoulos

The capacity and effectiveness of pre-trained multilingual models (MLMs) for zero-shot cross-lingual transfer is well established. However, phenomena of positive or negative transfer, and the effect of language choice still need to be fully understood, especially in the complex setting of massively multilingual LMs. We propose an textit{efficient} method to study transfer language influence in zero-shot performance on another target language. Unlike previous work, our approach disentangles downstream tasks from language, using dedicated adapter units. Our findings suggest that some languages do not largely affect others, while some languages, especially ones unseen during pre-training, can be extremely beneficial or detrimental for different target languages. We find that no transfer language is beneficial for all target languages. We do, curiously, observe languages previously unseen by MLMs consistently benefit from transfer from almost any language. We additionally use our modular approach to quantify negative interference efficiently and categorize languages accordingly. Furthermore, we provide a list of promising transfer-target language configurations that consistently lead to target language performance improvements. Code and data are publicly available: https://github.com/ffaisal93/neg_inf

Read more

4/1/2024