CORI: CJKV Benchmark with Romanization Integration -- A step towards Cross-lingual Transfer Beyond Textual Scripts

Overview

• The paper argues that naively assuming English as the source language for cross-lingual transfer can hinder performance for many languages.
• It highlights the importance of considering language contact, as some languages are more well-connected than others, and target languages can benefit from transferring from closely related languages.
• The paper constructs a novel benchmark dataset for the closely related Chinese-Japanese-Korean-Vietnamese (CJKV) languages to encourage in-depth studies of language contact.
• It proposes integrating Romanized transcription beyond textual scripts via Contrastive Learning objectives to enhance cross-lingual representations and enable effective zero-shot cross-lingual transfer.

Plain English Explanation

When training language models to work across different languages, researchers often use English as the source language. However, this approach may not work well for many other languages, as it fails to consider the important factor of language contact - the interaction and influence between languages.

Some languages are more closely connected or related to each other than others. For example, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Vietnamese (CJKV) languages have a high degree of contact and influence. This means that for these languages, it would be better to use a closely related language as the source for cross-lingual transfer, rather than relying solely on English.

To address this, the researchers created a new dataset focused on the CJKV languages. This will help researchers better understand the dynamics of language contact and how it can be leveraged to improve cross-lingual language models.

Additionally, the researchers propose integrating Romanized transcription (writing the languages using the Latin alphabet) into the training process, along with the original scripts. This can help the language models better capture the nuances and connections between these closely related languages, leading to more effective zero-shot cross-lingual transfer.

Technical Explanation

The paper argues that naively assuming English as the source language for cross-lingual transfer can hinder performance for many languages. This is because it fails to consider the importance of language contact - the interactions and influences between different languages.

The researchers demonstrate that some languages are more well-connected than others, and target languages can benefit from transferring knowledge from closely related languages. However, for many languages, the set of closely related languages does not include English.

To address this, the paper constructs a novel benchmark dataset for the CJKV languages (Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Vietnamese) to encourage in-depth studies of language contact. This dataset aims to capture the high degree of contact and influence between these closely related languages.

Furthermore, the researchers propose to integrate Romanized transcription (writing the languages using the Latin alphabet) beyond just the textual scripts. They use Contrastive Learning objectives to learn enhanced cross-lingual representations, which leads to effective zero-shot cross-lingual transfer.

Critical Analysis

The paper raises an important point about the limitations of using English as the default source language for cross-lingual transfer, especially for languages with strong language contact relationships. This is a valid concern, as previous research has shown that the choice of source language can significantly impact the performance of cross-lingual models.

The creation of the CJKV benchmark dataset is a valuable contribution, as it will enable researchers to better understand the nuances of language contact and how it can be leveraged for improved cross-lingual transfer. However, it would be interesting to see if the insights from this dataset can be generalized to other language families with varying degrees of contact.

The proposed approach of integrating Romanized transcription is an interesting idea, but its effectiveness may depend on the specific language pairs and tasks. Some studies have found that Romanization can lead to information loss, and the impact may vary depending on the language and script.

Lastly, the paper does not address the potential challenges of scaling this approach to a larger number of languages or the computational cost of the Contrastive Learning objectives. Further research may be needed to understand the tradeoffs and limitations of this approach, especially in the context of cross-lingual transfer robustness to lower-resource settings.

Conclusion

This paper highlights the importance of considering language contact when developing cross-lingual language models, rather than relying solely on English as the source language. By constructing a novel benchmark dataset for the CJKV languages and proposing the integration of Romanized transcription, the researchers aim to encourage more in-depth studies of language contact and its impact on cross-lingual transfer. The insights from this work can potentially lead to more effective and robust multilingual language models, with applications in various fields such as machine translation, cross-lingual information retrieval, and multilingual natural language processing.