Unlocking Fair Use in the Generative AI Supply Chain: A Systematized Literature Review

Read original: arXiv:2408.00613 - Published 8/2/2024 by Amruta Mahuli, Asia Biega
Total Score

0

Unlocking Fair Use in the Generative AI Supply Chain: A Systematized Literature Review

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper examines how to unlock fair use in the generative AI supply chain using a systematized literature review.
  • It explores the copyright challenges and legal implications around the use of source material in generative AI systems.
  • The research aims to provide a framework for balancing fair use and copyright concerns in the development and deployment of generative AI.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at the copyright issues that arise when generative AI systems, like image or text generators, use existing material as input. This is a relevant keyword link The authors review previous research to better understand the legal boundaries around "fair use" - when it's okay to use copyrighted material without permission.

The goal is to find a way to allow generative AI to be developed and used while still respecting the rights of creators whose work is being utilized. This is a relevant keyword link The paper aims to provide a framework or set of guidelines that can help balance the needs of AI innovators and the protections for original content producers.

Technical Explanation

The paper conducts a systematized literature review to analyze the existing research on fair use in the context of generative AI. The authors searched academic databases for relevant publications and applied a structured evaluation process to identify key themes and insights.

The review covers topics such as data ownership and provenance, legal interpretations of fair use, and stakeholder perspectives on transparency and attribution. The goal is to synthesize this existing knowledge into a cohesive framework for navigating fair use in generative AI systems.

Critical Analysis

The paper acknowledges the complexity and evolving nature of copyright law as it pertains to emerging technologies like generative AI. The authors note that there are still many unresolved questions and uncertainties around the appropriate application of fair use principles in this context.

While the proposed framework provides a useful starting point, it may need to be refined and adapted as legal precedents and industry practices continue to develop. Additionally, the review is limited to published academic literature, so there may be relevant perspectives or insights missing from industry, policy, or other non-academic sources.

Conclusion

This paper offers a comprehensive look at the copyright challenges facing the generative AI supply chain and proposes a framework for unlocking fair use in this domain. By synthesizing existing research, the authors aim to help guide the ethical and responsible development of generative AI systems that respect the rights of original content creators.

Ultimately, this work highlights the need for ongoing dialogue and cooperation between AI innovators, legal experts, and content producers to find balanced solutions that support innovation while protecting intellectual property rights.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Unlocking Fair Use in the Generative AI Supply Chain: A Systematized Literature Review
Total Score

0

Unlocking Fair Use in the Generative AI Supply Chain: A Systematized Literature Review

Amruta Mahuli, Asia Biega

Through a systematization of generative AI (GenAI) stakeholder goals and expectations, this work seeks to uncover what value different stakeholders see in their contributions to the GenAI supply line. This valuation enables us to understand whether fair use advocated by GenAI companies to train model progresses the copyright law objective of promoting science and arts. While assessing the validity and efficacy of the fair use argument, we uncover research gaps and potential avenues for future works for researchers and policymakers to address.

Read more

8/2/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Between Copyright and Computer Science: The Law and Ethics of Generative AI

Deven R. Desai, Mark Riedl

Copyright and computer science continue to intersect and clash, but they can coexist. The advent of new technologies such as digitization of visual and aural creations, sharing technologies, search engines, social media offerings, and more challenge copyright-based industries and reopen questions about the reach of copyright law. Breakthroughs in artificial intelligence research, especially Large Language Models that leverage copyrighted material as part of training models, are the latest examples of the ongoing tension between copyright and computer science. The exuberance, rush-to-market, and edge problem cases created by a few misguided companies now raises challenges to core legal doctrines and may shift Open Internet practices for the worse. That result does not have to be, and should not be, the outcome. This Article shows that, contrary to some scholars' views, fair use law does not bless all ways that someone can gain access to copyrighted material even when the purpose is fair use. Nonetheless, the scientific need for more data to advance AI research means access to large book corpora and the Open Internet is vital for the future of that research. The copyright industry claims, however, that almost all uses of copyrighted material must be compensated, even for non-expressive uses. The Article's solution accepts that both sides need to change. It is one that forces the computer science world to discipline its behaviors and, in some cases, pay for copyrighted material. It also requires the copyright industry to abandon its belief that all uses must be compensated or restricted to uses sanctioned by the copyright industry. As part of this re-balancing, the Article addresses a problem that has grown out of this clash and under theorized.

Read more

9/9/2024

An Economic Solution to Copyright Challenges of Generative AI
Total Score

0

An Economic Solution to Copyright Challenges of Generative AI

Jiachen T. Wang, Zhun Deng, Hiroaki Chiba-Okabe, Boaz Barak, Weijie J. Su

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) systems are trained on large data corpora to generate new pieces of text, images, videos, and other media. There is growing concern that such systems may infringe on the copyright interests of training data contributors. To address the copyright challenges of generative AI, we propose a framework that compensates copyright owners proportionally to their contributions to the creation of AI-generated content. The metric for contributions is quantitatively determined by leveraging the probabilistic nature of modern generative AI models and using techniques from cooperative game theory in economics. This framework enables a platform where AI developers benefit from access to high-quality training data, thus improving model performance. Meanwhile, copyright owners receive fair compensation, driving the continued provision of relevant data for generative model training. Experiments demonstrate that our framework successfully identifies the most relevant data sources used in artwork generation, ensuring a fair and interpretable distribution of revenues among copyright owners.

Read more

9/10/2024

⛏️

Total Score

0

Formal Specification, Assessment, and Enforcement of Fairness for Generative AIs

Chih-Hong Cheng, Harald Ruess, Changshun Wu, Xingyu Zhao

The deployment of generative AI (GenAI) models raises significant fairness concerns, addressed in this paper through novel characterization and enforcement techniques specific to GenAI. Unlike standard AI performing specific tasks, GenAI's broad functionality requires conditional fairness tailored to the context being generated, such as demographic fairness in generating images of poor people versus successful business leaders. We define two fairness levels: the first evaluates fairness in generated outputs, independent of prompts and models; the second assesses inherent fairness with neutral prompts. Given the complexity of GenAI and challenges in fairness specifications, we focus on bounding the worst case, considering a GenAI system unfair if the distance between appearances of a specific group exceeds preset thresholds. We also explore combinatorial testing for accessing relative completeness in intersectional fairness. By bounding the worst case, we develop a prompt injection scheme within an agent-based framework to enforce conditional fairness with minimal intervention, validated on state-of-the-art GenAI systems.

Read more

8/16/2024