User Response in Ad Auctions: An MDP Formulation of Long-Term Revenue Optimization
0
🛠️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Proposes a new Markov Decision Process (MDP) model for ad auctions
- Aims to capture user response to ad quality and maximize long-term discounted revenue
- Accounts for the interests of all three parties: advertisers, auctioneers, and users
- Characterizes the optimal mechanism as a Myerson's auction with a modified virtual value
- Presents a sample-efficient and computationally-efficient algorithm to approximate the optimal policy
- Introduces a simple second-price auction mechanism with personalized reserve prices that achieves a constant-factor approximation to the optimal long-term revenue
Plain English Explanation
This paper tackles the challenge of designing ad auctions that work well for everyone. The researchers propose a new mathematical model, called a Markov Decision Process (MDP), to capture how users respond to the quality of ads shown to them. Their goal is to find the best way to run the ad auction to maximize the long-term revenue for the auctioneer, while also considering the interests of the advertisers and the users.
The key idea is to model the user's state as their specific click-through rate (CTR), which can change based on the ads shown to them. The researchers then characterize the optimal auction mechanism as a Myerson's auction with a modified virtual value. This value depends on the advertiser's value distribution, the user's current state, and the future impact of showing the ad to the user.
The paper also presents an efficient algorithm that can approximately find the optimal policy for running the auction, without requiring full knowledge of the true MDP. Additionally, the researchers propose a simpler auction mechanism based on second-price auctions with personalized reserve prices, which can achieve a constant-factor approximation to the optimal long-term revenue.
Technical Explanation
The researchers propose a new Markov Decision Process (MDP) model to capture the user response to the quality of ads in ad auctions. The state of the user is represented by their click-through rate (CTR), which can change in the next round based on the set of ads shown to the user in the current round.
The objective is to maximize the long-term discounted revenue for the auctioneer, while considering the interests of all three parties involved: the advertisers, the auctioneer, and the users. The researchers characterize the optimal mechanism for this MDP as a Myerson's auction with a notion of modified virtual value, which depends on the value distribution of the advertiser, the current user state, and the future impact of showing the ad to the user.
To make the problem computationally tractable, the researchers design a sample-efficient and computationally-efficient algorithm that outputs an approximately optimal policy, requiring only sample access to the true MDP and the value distributions of the bidders. This algorithm leverages the Myerson's auction characterization of the optimal mechanism.
Additionally, the researchers propose a simple mechanism built upon second-price auctions with personalized reserve prices. They show that this simpler mechanism can achieve a constant-factor approximation to the optimal long-term discounted revenue, without requiring the full knowledge of the MDP.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a comprehensive and well-designed MDP model for ad auctions that takes into account the interests of all three parties involved: advertisers, auctioneers, and users. By incorporating the user's click-through rate (CTR) as the state, the model captures the dynamic nature of user response to ad quality, which is a crucial consideration in real-world ad auctions.
One potential limitation of the research is the assumption that the value distributions of the advertisers are known or can be estimated accurately. In practice, this information may be difficult to obtain, and the model's performance may be affected by uncertainty in these distributions.
Additionally, the paper focuses on maximizing the long-term discounted revenue for the auctioneer, which may not always align with the interests of the users. It would be interesting to explore alternative objectives or mechanisms that better balance the interests of all three parties, such as mechanisms that ensure no-regret for non-truthful auctions with budget constraints.
Overall, the research presented in this paper represents a significant advancement in modeling the realism of ad auctions and provides valuable insights for the design of automated auction mechanisms that can effectively balance the interests of all stakeholders.
Conclusion
This paper proposes a new Markov Decision Process (MDP) model for ad auctions that aims to capture the user response to ad quality and maximize the long-term discounted revenue for the auctioneer. The model accounts for the interests of all three parties involved: advertisers, auctioneers, and users.
The researchers characterize the optimal mechanism as a Myerson's auction with a modified virtual value, and present a sample-efficient and computationally-efficient algorithm to approximate the optimal policy. They also introduce a simpler second-price auction mechanism with personalized reserve prices that can achieve a constant-factor approximation to the optimal long-term revenue.
The research represents an important step forward in designing ad auction mechanisms that balance the interests of all stakeholders, and provides valuable insights for the ongoing efforts to improve the realism and practicality of ad auction models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🛠️
0
User Response in Ad Auctions: An MDP Formulation of Long-Term Revenue Optimization
Yang Cai, Zhe Feng, Christopher Liaw, Aranyak Mehta, Grigoris Velegkas
We propose a new Markov Decision Process (MDP) model for ad auctions to capture the user response to the quality of ads, with the objective of maximizing the long-term discounted revenue. By incorporating user response, our model takes into consideration all three parties involved in the auction (advertiser, auctioneer, and user). The state of the user is modeled as a user-specific click-through rate (CTR) with the CTR changing in the next round according to the set of ads shown to the user in the current round. We characterize the optimal mechanism for this MDP as a Myerson's auction with a notion of modified virtual value, which relies on the value distribution of the advertiser, the current user state, and the future impact of showing the ad to the user. Leveraging this characterization, we design a sample-efficient and computationally-efficient algorithm which outputs an approximately optimal policy that requires only sample access to the true MDP and the value distributions of the bidders. Finally, we propose a simple mechanism built upon second price auctions with personalized reserve prices and show it can achieve a constant-factor approximation to the optimal long term discounted revenue.
Read more5/7/2024
➖
0
Advancing Ad Auction Realism: Practical Insights & Modeling Implications
Ming Chen, Sareh Nabi, Marciano Siniscalchi
Contemporary real-world online ad auctions differ from canonical models [Edelman et al., 2007; Varian, 2009] in at least four ways: (1) values and click-through rates can depend upon users' search queries, but advertisers can only partially tune their bids to specific queries; (2) advertisers do not know the number, identity, and precise value distribution of competing bidders; (3) advertisers only receive partial, aggregated feedback, and (4) payment rules are only partially known to bidders. These features make it virtually impossible to fully characterize equilibrium bidding behavior. This paper shows that, nevertheless, one can still gain useful insight into modern ad auctions by modeling advertisers as agents governed by an adversarial bandit algorithm, independent of auction mechanism intricacies. To demonstrate our approach, we first simulate soft-floor auctions [Zeithammer, 2019], a complex, real-world pricing rule for which no complete equilibrium characterization is known. We find that (i) when values and click-through rates are query-dependent, soft floors can improve revenues relative to standard auction formats even if bidder types are drawn from the same distribution; and (ii) with distributional asymmetries that reflect relevant real-world scenario, we find that soft floors yield lower revenues than suitably chosen reserve prices, even restricting attention to a single query. We then demonstrate how to infer advertiser value distributions from observed bids for a variety of pricing rules, and illustrate our approach with aggregate data from an e-commerce website.
Read more4/11/2024
🖼️
0
A pragmatic policy learning approach to account for users' fatigue in repeated auctions
Benjamin Heymann (FAIRPLAY), R'emi Chan--Renous-Legoubin, Alexandre Gilotte
Online advertising banners are sold in real-time through auctions.Typically, the more banners a user is shown, the smaller the marginalvalue of the next banner for this user is. This fact can be detected bybasic ML models, that can be used to predict how previously won auctionsdecrease the current opportunity value. However, learning is not enough toproduce a bid that correctly accounts for how winning the current auctionimpacts the future values. Indeed, a policy that uses this prediction tomaximize the expected payoff of the current auction could be dubbedimpatient because such policy does not fully account for the repeatednature of the auctions. Under this perspective, it seems that most biddersin the literature are impatient. Unsurprisingly, impatience induces a cost.We provide two empirical arguments for the importance of this cost ofimpatience. First, an offline counterfactual analysis and, second, a notablebusiness metrics improvement by mitigating the cost of impatience withpolicy learning
Read more7/16/2024
📉
0
Autobidders with Budget and ROI Constraints: Efficiency, Regret, and Pacing Dynamics
Brendan Lucier, Sarath Pattathil, Aleksandrs Slivkins, Mengxiao Zhang
We study a game between autobidding algorithms that compete in an online advertising platform. Each autobidder is tasked with maximizing its advertiser's total value over multiple rounds of a repeated auction, subject to budget and return-on-investment constraints. We propose a gradient-based learning algorithm that is guaranteed to satisfy all constraints and achieves vanishing individual regret. Our algorithm uses only bandit feedback and can be used with the first- or second-price auction, as well as with any intermediate auction format. Our main result is that when these autobidders play against each other, the resulting expected liquid welfare over all rounds is at least half of the expected optimal liquid welfare achieved by any allocation. This holds whether or not the bidding dynamics converges to an equilibrium.
Read more6/13/2024