Using Combinatorial Optimization to Design a High quality LLM Solution

Read original: arXiv:2405.13020 - Published 5/24/2024 by Samuel Ackerman, Eitan Farchi, Rami Katan, Orna Raz
Total Score

0

🛠️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Novel LLM-based solution design approach that utilizes combinatorial optimization and sampling
  • Identifies factors influencing the quality of the LLM solution, including prompt types, LLM inputs, and generation parameters
  • Uses combinatorial optimization to create a small set of benchmark combinations that cover desired factor interactions
  • Evaluates the benchmark combinations to design a high-quality LLM solution pipeline
  • Efficient approach for time-consuming, manual LLM solution design and evaluation tasks
  • Can serve as a baseline for comparing and validating autoML approaches

Plain English Explanation

The researchers have developed a new method for designing high-quality solutions using large language models (LLMs). The key idea is to first identify the various factors that can influence the quality of the LLM-based solution. These factors might include the types of prompts used, the different inputs provided to the LLM, and the parameters that govern how the LLM generates and designs the final solution.

By understanding these influential factors, the researchers can then use a technique called combinatorial optimization to create a small set of benchmark combinations that cover all the desired interactions between these factors. This means they don't have to test every possible combination, which could be time-consuming, but can instead focus on a carefully selected subset.

The researchers then evaluate the performance of the LLM on each of these benchmark combinations, which may involve manual steps and human evaluation. This allows them to design a high-quality LLM solution pipeline that takes into account the complex interplay between the different factors.

This approach is particularly useful when the process of designing and evaluating each benchmark is itself time-consuming and labor-intensive. The efficiency of this method also means it can be used as a baseline to compare and validate autoML approaches that search for the best combination of factors to optimize the LLM-based solution.

Technical Explanation

The researchers have developed a novel approach to designing LLM-based solutions that leverages combinatorial optimization and sampling techniques. The key steps are as follows:

  1. Identify Influential Factors: The researchers first identify a set of factors that can influence the quality of the LLM-based solution. These factors typically include the types of prompts used, the different input alternatives for the LLM, and the parameters that govern the generation and design of the final solution.

  2. Define Factor Interactions: Next, the researchers define the interactions between these factors, which can be complex and multifaceted. This understanding of factor interactions is crucial for the subsequent optimization step.

  3. Combinatorial Optimization: Using combinatorial optimization, the researchers create a small subset of benchmark combinations, denoted as $P$, that ensures all the desired factor interactions are covered. This is more efficient than testing every possible combination.

  4. Benchmark Evaluation: Each element $p$ in the set $P$ is then developed into an appropriate benchmark. The researchers apply the alternative solutions on each benchmark $p$ and evaluate the results, which may involve manual steps and human evaluation.

  5. Solution Pipeline Design: The insights gained from evaluating the benchmarks in $P$ are used to design a high-quality LLM solution pipeline that takes into account the complex interplay between the different factors.

This approach is particularly useful when the design and evaluation of each benchmark in $P$ is time-consuming and involves manual steps and human evaluation, as is often the case with LLM-based solutions. The efficiency of this method also means it can be used as a baseline to compare and validate autoML approaches that search for the best combination of factors to optimize the LLM-based solution.

Critical Analysis

The researchers have presented a novel and efficient approach for designing high-quality LLM-based solutions. By identifying the key factors that influence the solution quality and using combinatorial optimization to create a small set of benchmarks, the researchers have addressed the challenge of time-consuming and manual LLM solution design and evaluation tasks.

One potential limitation of this approach is that it relies on the researchers' ability to accurately identify the relevant factors and their interactions. If important factors are overlooked or the factor interactions are not well-understood, the resulting benchmark set may not be representative of the full solution space.

Additionally, the researchers mention that the evaluation of each benchmark may involve manual steps and human evaluation, which could introduce subjective biases and inconsistencies. It would be valuable to explore ways to further automate the evaluation process or develop more objective evaluation metrics to enhance the reliability of the results.

Despite these potential caveats, the researchers' approach presents a promising direction for streamlining the design of LLM-based solutions, especially in domains where the design and evaluation process is time-consuming and labor-intensive. By serving as a baseline for comparing and validating autoML approaches, this method can also contribute to the development of more efficient and robust LLM-based solution pipelines.

Conclusion

The researchers have introduced a novel LLM-based solution design approach that leverages combinatorial optimization and sampling techniques. By identifying the key factors influencing the quality of the LLM solution and using combinatorial optimization to create a small set of representative benchmarks, the researchers have developed an efficient method for designing high-quality LLM solution pipelines.

This approach is particularly useful in scenarios where the design and evaluation of LLM-based solutions is time-consuming and involves manual steps and human evaluation. The efficiency of this method also allows it to serve as a baseline for comparing and validating autoML approaches that search for the optimal combination of factors to optimize the LLM-based solution.

As the field of LLM-based solutions continues to evolve, this research provides a valuable contribution by offering a systematic and practical approach to streamlining the design process. By bridging the gap between subject matter expertise and LLM capabilities, the researchers have demonstrated the potential for achieving high-quality LLM-based solutions in a more efficient and informed manner.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🛠️

Total Score

0

Using Combinatorial Optimization to Design a High quality LLM Solution

Samuel Ackerman, Eitan Farchi, Rami Katan, Orna Raz

We introduce a novel LLM based solution design approach that utilizes combinatorial optimization and sampling. Specifically, a set of factors that influence the quality of the solution are identified. They typically include factors that represent prompt types, LLM inputs alternatives, and parameters governing the generation and design alternatives. Identifying the factors that govern the LLM solution quality enables the infusion of subject matter expert knowledge. Next, a set of interactions between the factors are defined and combinatorial optimization is used to create a small subset $P$ that ensures all desired interactions occur in $P$. Each element $p in P$ is then developed into an appropriate benchmark. Applying the alternative solutions on each combination, $p in P$ and evaluating the results facilitate the design of a high quality LLM solution pipeline. The approach is especially applicable when the design and evaluation of each benchmark in $P$ is time-consuming and involves manual steps and human evaluation. Given its efficiency the approach can also be used as a baseline to compare and validate an autoML approach that searches over the factors governing the solution.

Read more

5/24/2024

Search-Based LLMs for Code Optimization
Total Score

0

Search-Based LLMs for Code Optimization

Shuzheng Gao, Cuiyun Gao, Wenchao Gu, Michael Lyu

The code written by developers usually suffers from efficiency problems and contain various performance bugs. These inefficiencies necessitate the research of automated refactoring methods for code optimization. Early research in code optimization employs rule-based methods and focuses on specific inefficiency issues, which are labor-intensive and suffer from the low coverage issue. Recent work regards the task as a sequence generation problem, and resorts to deep learning (DL) techniques such as large language models (LLMs). These methods typically prompt LLMs to directly generate optimized code. Although these methods show state-of-the-art performance, such one-step generation paradigm is hard to achieve an optimal solution. First, complex optimization methods such as combinatorial ones are hard to be captured by LLMs. Second, the one-step generation paradigm poses challenge in precisely infusing the knowledge required for effective code optimization within LLMs, resulting in under-optimized code.To address these problems, we propose to model this task from the search perspective, and propose a search-based LLMs framework named SBLLM that enables iterative refinement and discovery of improved optimization methods. SBLLM synergistically integrate LLMs with evolutionary search and consists of three key components: 1) an execution-based representative sample selection part that evaluates the fitness of each existing optimized code and prioritizes promising ones to pilot the generation of improved code; 2) an adaptive optimization pattern retrieval part that infuses targeted optimization patterns into the model for guiding LLMs towards rectifying and progressively enhancing their optimization methods; and 3) a genetic operator-inspired chain-of-thought prompting part that aids LLMs in combining different optimization methods and generating improved optimization methods.

Read more

8/23/2024

Towards Optimizing with Large Language Models
Total Score

0

Towards Optimizing with Large Language Models

Pei-Fu Guo, Ying-Hsuan Chen, Yun-Da Tsai, Shou-De Lin

In this work, we conduct an assessment of the optimization capabilities of LLMs across various tasks and data sizes. Each of these tasks corresponds to unique optimization domains, and LLMs are required to execute these tasks with interactive prompting. That is, in each optimization step, the LLM generates new solutions from the past generated solutions with their values, and then the new solutions are evaluated and considered in the next optimization step. Additionally, we introduce three distinct metrics for a comprehensive assessment of task performance from various perspectives. These metrics offer the advantage of being applicable for evaluating LLM performance across a broad spectrum of optimization tasks and are less sensitive to variations in test samples. By applying these metrics, we observe that LLMs exhibit strong optimization capabilities when dealing with small-sized samples. However, their performance is significantly influenced by factors like data size and values, underscoring the importance of further research in the domain of optimization tasks for LLMs.

Read more

5/28/2024

On the Design and Analysis of LLM-Based Algorithms
Total Score

1

On the Design and Analysis of LLM-Based Algorithms

Yanxi Chen, Yaliang Li, Bolin Ding, Jingren Zhou

We initiate a formal investigation into the design and analysis of LLM-based algorithms, i.e. algorithms that contain one or multiple calls of large language models (LLMs) as sub-routines and critically rely on the capabilities of LLMs. While LLM-based algorithms, ranging from basic LLM calls with prompt engineering to complicated LLM-powered agent systems and compound AI systems, have achieved remarkable empirical success, the design and optimization of them have mostly relied on heuristics and trial-and-errors, which is largely due to a lack of formal and analytical study for these algorithms. To fill this gap, we start by identifying the computational-graph representation of LLM-based algorithms, the design principle of task decomposition, and some key abstractions, which then facilitate our formal analysis for the accuracy and efficiency of LLM-based algorithms, despite the black-box nature of LLMs. Through extensive analytical and empirical investigation in a series of case studies, we demonstrate that the proposed framework is broadly applicable to a wide range of scenarios and diverse patterns of LLM-based algorithms, such as parallel, hierarchical and recursive task decomposition. Our proposed framework holds promise for advancing LLM-based algorithms, by revealing the reasons behind curious empirical phenomena, guiding the choices of hyperparameters, predicting the empirical performance of algorithms, and inspiring new algorithm design. To promote further study of LLM-based algorithms, we release our source code at https://github.com/modelscope/agentscope/tree/main/examples/paper_llm_based_algorithm.

Read more

9/27/2024