Utilizing Description Logics for Global Explanations of Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks

Overview

• Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are effective for node classification in graph-structured data, but lack explainability, especially at the global level
• Current research focuses on using subgraphs or generating new graphs to provide explanations
• This paper proposes utilizing class expressions (CEs) from description logic to provide more expressive explanations for heterogeneous graphs

Plain English Explanation

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are a type of machine learning model that are good at working with data organized in the form of graphs, such as social networks or chemical molecules. However, one of the limitations of GNNs is that it can be difficult to understand how they arrive at their predictions, especially when looking at the overall graph rather than just a small part of it.

Most current research on explaining GNNs has focused on two main approaches: using subgraphs of the original input as local explanations, or generating entirely new graphs as global explanations. While these graph-based methods can provide some insights, they are limited in their ability to capture complex relationships and patterns that may span multiple parts of the graph.

To address this, the researchers in this paper propose a new approach that utilizes something called "class expressions" (CEs) from the field of description logic. CEs allow for more detailed and nuanced explanations by capturing the various characteristics and relationships that define different classes or categories within the graph data.

The key idea is to use CEs to explain the predictions of a GNN on heterogeneous graphs, where there are different types of nodes (e.g. people, locations, organizations). The researchers explore two different ways of scoring the quality of these CE-based explanations: one that looks at the GNN's predictions on multiple subgraphs, and another that compares the GNN's predictions to the predictions made by the CE itself on a separate dataset.

By moving beyond simple subgraph-based explanations and leveraging the expressive power of description logic, this approach aims to provide more meaningful and insightful explanations for the decisions made by powerful GNN models.

Technical Explanation

This paper proposes a novel approach for providing global-level explanations for the predictions made by Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) on heterogeneous graph-structured data.

The key innovation is the use of class expressions (CEs) from the field of description logic (DL) to capture complex relationships and patterns within the graph. Unlike existing methods that rely on subgraphs or generated graphs as explanations, the CE-based approach can express more nuanced and comprehensive concepts that define the different classes or categories in the data.

To identify the best CE-based explanation for a GNN's prediction, the researchers explore two different scoring functions:

1. Graph-based scoring: For a given CE, they construct multiple subgraphs from the original input, have the GNN make a prediction for each subgraph, and then aggregate the predicted scores.

2. Fidelity-based scoring: They score the CE in terms of how well its predictions match the GNN's predictions on a separate validation set, measuring the "fidelity" of the CE as an explanation.

The researchers evaluate their approach on several heterogeneous graph datasets, demonstrating that the CE-based explanations can outperform subgraph-based methods in terms of both faithfulness to the GNN's decision-making and human interpretability.

Critical Analysis

One of the key strengths of this research is its focus on providing global-level explanations for GNN models, which is an important but often overlooked aspect of model interpretability. By moving beyond local subgraph-based explanations, the CE-based approach has the potential to uncover more comprehensive and meaningful insights about the overall decision-making logic of GNNs.

That said, the researchers acknowledge some limitations in their work. For example, the current approach may struggle to explain classes with multiple sufficient explanations, as the CE formalism is limited in its ability to capture disjunctive concepts. Additionally, the computational complexity of the CE discovery process could be a practical challenge, especially for large and complex graphs.

Further research could explore ways to address these limitations, such as by combining CE-based explanations with other interpretability techniques or developing more efficient CE discovery algorithms. Additionally, more user studies would be valuable to assess the real-world understandability and usefulness of the CE-based explanations from a human-centered perspective.

Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in the quest for more expressive and interpretable GNN models, and the ideas presented here could have significant implications for a wide range of graph-based applications.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel approach for providing global-level explanations for Graph Neural Network (GNN) predictions using class expressions (CEs) from description logic. By leveraging the expressive power of CEs, the researchers demonstrate that it is possible to capture more nuanced and comprehensive patterns within heterogeneous graph data, going beyond the limitations of subgraph-based explanations.

The proposed CE-based explanation method, coupled with the two scoring functions explored in the paper, offers a promising direction for improving the interpretability of GNNs. As GNNs continue to gain traction in a variety of real-world applications, such advancements in explainability will be crucial for building trust, accountability, and responsible development of these powerful machine learning models.