Value Alignment from Unstructured Text

Read original: arXiv:2408.10392 - Published 8/21/2024 by Inkit Padhi, Karthikeyan Natesan Ramamurthy, Prasanna Sattigeri, Manish Nagireddy, Pierre Dognin, Kush R. Varshney

Overview

The paper explores techniques for aligning large language models with human values using unstructured text data.
It investigates methods for extracting value representations from language models and assessing their alignment with human values.
The research aims to develop more ethical and socially-aware AI systems that can better capture and reflect human values.

Plain English Explanation

Value Alignment from Unstructured Text

The key idea behind this research is to find ways to align the behavior and decision-making of artificial intelligence (AI) systems with human values. This is important because as AI becomes more advanced and capable, we want to ensure it is acting in ways that are beneficial to humanity rather than causing harm.

The researchers focused on using unstructured text data, such as books, websites, and social media, to extract representations of human values that could then be used to guide the training and behavior of AI models. By analyzing large amounts of natural language, they hoped to identify the core ethical principles, societal norms, and personal values that are reflected in human discourse.

Once these value representations were extracted, the researchers then assessed how well they aligned with the actual values and preferences of human evaluators. This allowed them to identify areas where the AI's understanding of values diverged from what people actually care about, and make adjustments to improve the alignment.

The ultimate goal is to create AI systems that can reliably and transparently incorporate human values into their decision-making, leading to more trustworthy and beneficial AI that is well-suited to serving humanity's interests. This is a challenging but important area of research as AI becomes increasingly powerful and ubiquitous in our lives.

Technical Explanation

Alignment from Unsupervised Data

The researchers explored several approaches for extracting value representations from unstructured text data in an unsupervised manner, without relying on labeled datasets.

One method involved using language models to generate value embeddings - numerical representations of ethical and social concepts - from the context in which they appear in natural language. By analyzing the co-occurrence patterns of values-related words, the models could learn implicit associations between different values.

Another approach looked at extracting value-laden language by identifying words and phrases that express moral judgments, aspirations, or references to societal norms. This allowed the extraction of more explicit representations of human values from the text.

The researchers then evaluated the alignment between these extracted value representations and human value judgments, using crowdsourced surveys and other evaluation techniques. This provided insights into the extent to which the language model's understanding of values matched real human values.

Overall, the paper demonstrates the feasibility of learning value representations from unstructured text, and using them to assess and improve the value alignment of AI systems. However, the researchers also acknowledge the challenges in fully capturing the nuance and complexity of human values through this approach.

Critical Analysis

The research presented in this paper takes an important step towards the goal of creating AI systems that are well-aligned with human values. By focusing on unstructured text data, the researchers are able to tap into the rich source of value-related information contained in natural language, beyond what might be available in curated datasets.

That said, there are some limitations to this approach that are worth considering. Extracting value representations from language models, while insightful, may not capture the full depth and context of human values. Individuals and communities can have very different value systems that may not be fully reflected in aggregate text data.

Additionally, the evaluation of value alignment relies heavily on crowdsourced judgments, which can be influenced by factors like survey design, demographics of respondents, and the complexity of the value concepts being assessed. More rigorous and multi-faceted evaluation methods may be needed to truly validate the alignment between AI and human values.

Further research is also needed to understand how these value representations can be effectively incorporated into AI decision-making and behavior. Translating high-level value concepts into concrete, actionable guidelines for AI systems remains a significant challenge.

Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in the quest to develop AI that is truly aligned with human values. However, continued work is needed to fully address the nuances and difficulties inherent in this endeavor.

Conclusion

This research explores innovative techniques for aligning the behavior of AI systems with human values, using unstructured text data as the primary source. By extracting value representations from language models and assessing their alignment with human judgments, the researchers demonstrate the feasibility of this approach.

The findings have significant implications for the development of more ethical and socially-aware AI that can reliably incorporate human values into its decision-making. As AI becomes increasingly influential in our lives, ensuring its alignment with human values is critical for building a future where technology serves the greater good.

While challenges remain, this paper represents an important contribution to the ongoing efforts to create AI systems that are truly aligned with the values and preferences of the people they are designed to serve.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Value Alignment from Unstructured Text

Inkit Padhi, Karthikeyan Natesan Ramamurthy, Prasanna Sattigeri, Manish Nagireddy, Pierre Dognin, Kush R. Varshney

Aligning large language models (LLMs) to value systems has emerged as a significant area of research within the fields of AI and NLP. Currently, this alignment process relies on the availability of high-quality supervised and preference data, which can be both time-consuming and expensive to curate or annotate. In this paper, we introduce a systematic end-to-end methodology for aligning LLMs to the implicit and explicit values represented in unstructured text data. Our proposed approach leverages the use of scalable synthetic data generation techniques to effectively align the model to the values present in the unstructured data. Through two distinct use-cases, we demonstrate the efficiency of our methodology on the Mistral-7B-Instruct model. Our approach credibly aligns LLMs to the values embedded within documents, and shows improved performance against other approaches, as quantified through the use of automatic metrics and win rates.

8/21/2024

Self-Alignment: Improving Alignment of Cultural Values in LLMs via In-Context Learning

Rochelle Choenni, Ekaterina Shutova

Improving the alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) with respect to the cultural values that they encode has become an increasingly important topic. In this work, we study whether we can exploit existing knowledge about cultural values at inference time to adjust model responses to cultural value probes. We present a simple and inexpensive method that uses a combination of in-context learning (ICL) and human survey data, and show that we can improve the alignment to cultural values across 5 models that include both English-centric and multilingual LLMs. Importantly, we show that our method could prove useful in test languages other than English and can improve alignment to the cultural values that correspond to a range of culturally diverse countries.

8/30/2024

Exploring Multilingual Concepts of Human Value in Large Language Models: Is Value Alignment Consistent, Transferable and Controllable across Languages?

Shaoyang Xu, Weilong Dong, Zishan Guo, Xinwei Wu, Deyi Xiong

Prior research in representation engineering has revealed that LLMs encode concepts within their representation spaces, predominantly centered around English. In this study, we extend this philosophy to a multilingual scenario, delving into multilingual human value concepts in LLMs. Through our comprehensive exploration covering 7 types of human values, 16 languages and 3 LLM series with distinct multilinguality, we empirically substantiate the existence of multilingual human values in LLMs. Further cross-lingual analysis on these concepts discloses 3 traits arising from language resource disparities: cross-lingual inconsistency, distorted linguistic relationships, and unidirectional cross-lingual transfer between high- and low-resource languages, all in terms of human value concepts. Additionally, we validate the feasibility of cross-lingual control over value alignment capabilities of LLMs, leveraging the dominant language as a source language. Drawing from our findings on multilingual value alignment, we prudently provide suggestions on the composition of multilingual data for LLMs pre-training: including a limited number of dominant languages for cross-lingual alignment transfer while avoiding their excessive prevalence, and keeping a balanced distribution of non-dominant languages. We aspire that our findings would contribute to enhancing the safety and utility of multilingual AI.

4/17/2024

High-Dimension Human Value Representation in Large Language Models

Samuel Cahyawijaya, Delong Chen, Yejin Bang, Leila Khalatbari, Bryan Wilie, Ziwei Ji, Etsuko Ishii, Pascale Fung

The widespread application of Large Language Models (LLMs) across various tasks and fields has necessitated the alignment of these models with human values and preferences. Given various approaches of human value alignment, ranging from Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF), to constitutional learning, etc. there is an urgent need to understand the scope and nature of human values injected into these models before their release. There is also a need for model alignment without a costly large scale human annotation effort. We propose UniVaR, a high-dimensional representation of human value distributions in LLMs, orthogonal to model architecture and training data. Trained from the value-relevant output of eight multilingual LLMs and tested on the output from four multilingual LLMs, namely LlaMA2, ChatGPT, JAIS and Yi, we show that UniVaR is a powerful tool to compare the distribution of human values embedded in different LLMs with different langauge sources. Through UniVaR, we explore how different LLMs prioritize various values in different languages and cultures, shedding light on the complex interplay between human values and language modeling.

4/12/2024