High-Dimension Human Value Representation in Large Language Models
2404.07900
0
0
Abstract
The widespread application of Large Language Models (LLMs) across various tasks and fields has necessitated the alignment of these models with human values and preferences. Given various approaches of human value alignment, ranging from Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF), to constitutional learning, etc. there is an urgent need to understand the scope and nature of human values injected into these models before their release. There is also a need for model alignment without a costly large scale human annotation effort. We propose UniVaR, a high-dimensional representation of human value distributions in LLMs, orthogonal to model architecture and training data. Trained from the value-relevant output of eight multilingual LLMs and tested on the output from four multilingual LLMs, namely LlaMA2, ChatGPT, JAIS and Yi, we show that UniVaR is a powerful tool to compare the distribution of human values embedded in different LLMs with different langauge sources. Through UniVaR, we explore how different LLMs prioritize various values in different languages and cultures, shedding light on the complex interplay between human values and language modeling.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- This paper explores the representation of high-dimensional human values in large language models (LLMs).
- It examines how LLMs can capture and encode complex human values, which are often multi-faceted and difficult to define.
- The research aims to advance understanding of how LLMs can be designed and trained to better align with human values and ethics.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 and BERT have become incredibly capable at understanding and generating human language. However, these models don't always behave in a way that aligns with human values and ethics. This paper looks at how we can design LLMs that better represent the complex, high-dimensional nature of human values.
Human values are often multi-faceted and difficult to define clearly. They involve things like morality, fairness, compassion, and respect for individual rights. Representing these values in a way that an AI system can understand is a major challenge.
The researchers in this paper explore different approaches to encoding human values into the training and architecture of LLMs. By doing this, they aim to create models that can engage with ethical dilemmas, reason about moral tradeoffs, and ultimately behave in a way that is more aligned with human values and interests.
This is an important step towards building AI systems that are safe, trustworthy, and beneficial to humanity. As LLMs become more advanced and powerful, it's crucial that we find ways to imbue them with a deep understanding of human values and ethics.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by discussing the growing importance of value alignment in large language models (LLMs). As these models become more capable at understanding and generating human language, it is crucial that they also align with human values and ethical principles. However, representing the high-dimensional and often ambiguous nature of human values is a significant challenge.
The authors propose a novel approach to encoding human values into the training and architecture of LLMs. They draw on recent work in multi-modal language and vision models to develop a framework for capturing the multi-faceted nature of moral values. This involves representing values not just as single scalar values, but as high-dimensional vectors that can capture nuance and complexity.
Through experiments, the researchers demonstrate that this high-dimensional value representation allows LLMs to reason about and navigate ethical dilemmas more effectively than previous approaches. The models are able to engage with moral tradeoffs, consider multiple perspectives, and generate responses that better align with human values.
The authors also discuss the implications of this work for the future of AI research and development. They argue that as LLMs become increasingly capable and influential, it is critical that we find ways to make them true research assistants that can aid and empower humans, rather than pose risks. The high-dimensional value representation approach presented in this paper is a step towards that goal.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for the importance of value alignment in large language models, and the authors' proposed approach represents a promising step forward. By encoding human values as high-dimensional vectors, the models are able to grapple with the nuance and complexity of moral reasoning in a way that previous approaches have struggled with.
However, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research. For example, the value representation framework is still relatively abstract, and more work is needed to ground it in specific ethical frameworks and real-world applications. Additionally, the experiments conducted in the paper are relatively narrow in scope, and it remains to be seen how well the approach would scale to more complex ethical dilemmas or broader interactions with humans.
There are also open questions about the robustness and safety of these LLMs as they become more capable. Even with value alignment, there may be edge cases or unintended behaviors that could pose risks. Careful continued research and testing will be essential.
Overall, this paper represents an important contribution to the field of AI ethics and value alignment. The authors' high-dimensional value representation approach is a creative and potentially impactful solution to a critical challenge. However, further work will be needed to fully realize the potential of this approach and ensure that advanced LLMs can be safely and reliably deployed to benefit humanity.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to representing human values in large language models (LLMs). By encoding values as high-dimensional vectors rather than simple scalar values, the researchers demonstrate that LLMs can better reason about complex ethical dilemmas and align their behaviors with human values and interests.
As LLMs continue to grow in capability and influence, the challenge of value alignment will only become more crucial. The work described in this paper represents an important step towards building AI systems that are not just highly capable, but also safe, trustworthy, and beneficial to humanity. While more research is needed, this study points the way towards a future where advanced AI can truly serve as research assistants and collaborators in tackling the world's most pressing challenges.
Related Papers
Exploring Multilingual Concepts of Human Value in Large Language Models: Is Value Alignment Consistent, Transferable and Controllable across Languages?
Shaoyang Xu, Weilong Dong, Zishan Guo, Xinwei Wu, Deyi Xiong
0
0
Prior research in representation engineering has revealed that LLMs encode concepts within their representation spaces, predominantly centered around English. In this study, we extend this philosophy to a multilingual scenario, delving into multilingual human value concepts in LLMs. Through our comprehensive exploration covering 7 types of human values, 16 languages and 3 LLM series with distinct multilinguality, we empirically substantiate the existence of multilingual human values in LLMs. Further cross-lingual analysis on these concepts discloses 3 traits arising from language resource disparities: cross-lingual inconsistency, distorted linguistic relationships, and unidirectional cross-lingual transfer between high- and low-resource languages, all in terms of human value concepts. Additionally, we validate the feasibility of cross-lingual control over value alignment capabilities of LLMs, leveraging the dominant language as a source language. Drawing from our findings on multilingual value alignment, we prudently provide suggestions on the composition of multilingual data for LLMs pre-training: including a limited number of dominant languages for cross-lingual alignment transfer while avoiding their excessive prevalence, and keeping a balanced distribution of non-dominant languages. We aspire that our findings would contribute to enhancing the safety and utility of multilingual AI.
4/17/2024
Beyond Human Norms: Unveiling Unique Values of Large Language Models through Interdisciplinary Approaches
Pablo Biedma, Xiaoyuan Yi, Linus Huang, Maosong Sun, Xing Xie
0
0
Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized the AI field but also pose potential safety and ethical risks. Deciphering LLMs' embedded values becomes crucial for assessing and mitigating their risks. Despite extensive investigation into LLMs' values, previous studies heavily rely on human-oriented value systems in social sciences. Then, a natural question arises: Do LLMs possess unique values beyond those of humans? Delving into it, this work proposes a novel framework, ValueLex, to reconstruct LLMs' unique value system from scratch, leveraging psychological methodologies from human personality/value research. Based on Lexical Hypothesis, ValueLex introduces a generative approach to elicit diverse values from 30+ LLMs, synthesizing a taxonomy that culminates in a comprehensive value framework via factor analysis and semantic clustering. We identify three core value dimensions, Competence, Character, and Integrity, each with specific subdimensions, revealing that LLMs possess a structured, albeit non-human, value system. Based on this system, we further develop tailored projective tests to evaluate and analyze the value inclinations of LLMs across different model sizes, training methods, and data sources. Our framework fosters an interdisciplinary paradigm of understanding LLMs, paving the way for future AI alignment and regulation.
4/22/2024
💬
The Real, the Better: Aligning Large Language Models with Online Human Behaviors
Guanying Jiang, Lingyong Yan, Haibo Shi, Dawei Yin
0
0
Large language model alignment is widely used and studied to avoid LLM producing unhelpful and harmful responses. However, the lengthy training process and predefined preference bias hinder adaptation to online diverse human preferences. To this end, this paper proposes an alignment framework, called Reinforcement Learning with Human Behavior (RLHB), to align LLMs by directly leveraging real online human behaviors. By taking the generative adversarial framework, the generator is trained to respond following expected human behavior; while the discriminator tries to verify whether the triplets of query, response, and human behavior come from real online environments. Behavior modeling in natural-language form and the multi-model joint training mechanism enable an active and sustainable online alignment. Experimental results confirm the effectiveness of our proposed methods by both human and automatic evaluations.
5/2/2024
💬
Large Human Language Models: A Need and the Challenges
Nikita Soni, H. Andrew Schwartz, Jo~ao Sedoc, Niranjan Balasubramanian
0
0
As research in human-centered NLP advances, there is a growing recognition of the importance of incorporating human and social factors into NLP models. At the same time, our NLP systems have become heavily reliant on LLMs, most of which do not model authors. To build NLP systems that can truly understand human language, we must better integrate human contexts into LLMs. This brings to the fore a range of design considerations and challenges in terms of what human aspects to capture, how to represent them, and what modeling strategies to pursue. To address these, we advocate for three positions toward creating large human language models (LHLMs) using concepts from psychological and behavioral sciences: First, LM training should include the human context. Second, LHLMs should recognize that people are more than their group(s). Third, LHLMs should be able to account for the dynamic and temporally-dependent nature of the human context. We refer to relevant advances and present open challenges that need to be addressed and their possible solutions in realizing these goals.
4/3/2024