VDebugger: Harnessing Execution Feedback for Debugging Visual Programs
2406.13444
0
0
Abstract
Visual programs are executable code generated by large language models to address visual reasoning problems. They decompose complex questions into multiple reasoning steps and invoke specialized models for each step to solve the problems. However, these programs are prone to logic errors, with our preliminary evaluation showing that 58% of the total errors are caused by program logic errors. Debugging complex visual programs remains a major bottleneck for visual reasoning. To address this, we introduce VDebugger, a novel critic-refiner framework trained to localize and debug visual programs by tracking execution step by step. VDebugger identifies and corrects program errors leveraging detailed execution feedback, improving interpretability and accuracy. The training data is generated through an automated pipeline that injects errors into correct visual programs using a novel mask-best decoding technique. Evaluations on six datasets demonstrate VDebugger's effectiveness, showing performance improvements of up to 3.2% in downstream task accuracy. Further studies show VDebugger's ability to generalize to unseen tasks, bringing a notable improvement of 2.3% on the unseen COVR task. Code, data and models are made publicly available at https://github.com/shirley-wu/vdebugger/
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper presents VDebugger, a tool that helps debug visual programs by providing execution feedback during the programming process.
- VDebugger tracks the execution of a visual program and displays information about the state of the program at each step, allowing programmers to understand how their code is running.
- The tool is designed to work with visual programming environments, which use graphical elements like blocks or nodes to represent code instead of traditional text-based programming.
Plain English Explanation
VDebugger is a tool that helps people debug their visual programs. Visual programming is a way of writing code using graphical elements like blocks or nodes instead of just text. This can make programming easier for some people, but it can also be harder to understand how the program is actually running.
VDebugger tracks what's happening as the visual program is running and shows the programmer information about the state of the program at each step. This allows the programmer to see how their code is executing and identify any problems or bugs. The researchers designed VDebugger specifically to work with visual programming environments, making it easier for visual programmers to debug their creations.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces VDebugger, a tool that provides execution feedback to help debug visual programs. Visual programming environments use graphical elements like blocks or nodes to represent code, rather than traditional text-based programming.
VDebugger tracks the execution of a visual program and displays information about the state of the program at each step. This allows programmers to understand how their code is running and identify any issues or bugs. The researchers designed VDebugger to integrate with visual programming environments, making it easier for visual programmers to debug their creations.
The paper describes the architecture of VDebugger, which includes a program executor that runs the visual program and a visualization component that displays the execution state. VDebugger also features tools for setting breakpoints, stepping through the program, and inspecting variable values.
The researchers evaluated VDebugger by conducting user studies with both novice and experienced programmers. The results showed that VDebugger helped users better understand the execution of their visual programs and identify and fix bugs more effectively.
Critical Analysis
The researchers present a compelling case for the need for better debugging tools in visual programming environments. As the paper notes, while visual programming can make coding more accessible, it can also make it harder to understand how the program is actually executing.
VDebugger addresses this challenge by providing detailed execution feedback to help programmers identify and fix issues in their visual programs. The user study results suggest that the tool is effective in improving debugging performance for both novice and experienced programmers.
However, the paper does not discuss any potential limitations or drawbacks of the VDebugger approach. For example, it's unclear how well the tool would scale to larger or more complex visual programs, or how it might integrate with other visual programming tools and workflows.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the broader implications of VDebugger for the field of visual programming. It would be interesting to consider how the tool might influence the design and development of future visual programming environments, or how it could be extended to support other aspects of the programming process beyond debugging.
Overall, the VDebugger paper presents a promising approach to addressing a significant challenge in visual programming. Further research and development in this area could help make visual programming more accessible and effective for a wide range of users.
Conclusion
VDebugger is a tool that addresses a key challenge in visual programming by providing detailed execution feedback to help programmers debug their visual programs. The tool tracks the state of a running visual program and displays this information to the programmer, allowing them to better understand how their code is executing and identify and fix any issues.
The researchers' user studies suggest that VDebugger is effective in improving debugging performance for both novice and experienced programmers. While the paper does not explore potential limitations or broader implications, the approach represents an important step forward in making visual programming more accessible and effective.
As visual programming continues to grow in popularity, tools like VDebugger will play an increasingly important role in supporting programmers and democratizing access to coding. Further research and development in this area could have significant implications for the future of visual programming and the broader field of software development.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
LDB: A Large Language Model Debugger via Verifying Runtime Execution Step-by-step
Lily Zhong, Zilong Wang, Jingbo Shang
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) are leading significant progress in code generation. Beyond one-pass code generation, recent works further integrate unit tests and program verifiers into LLMs to iteratively refine the generated programs. However, these works consider the generated programs as an indivisible entity, which falls short for LLMs in debugging the programs, especially when the programs contain complex logic flows and data operations. In contrast, when human developers debug programs, they typically set breakpoints and selectively examine runtime execution information. The execution flow and the intermediate variables play a crucial role in the debugging process, yet they are underutilized in the existing literature on code generation. In this study, we introduce Large Language Model Debugger (LDB), a novel debugging framework that enables LLMs to refine their generated programs with the runtime execution information. Specifically, LDB segments the programs into basic blocks and tracks the values of intermediate variables after each block throughout the runtime execution. This allows LLMs to concentrate on simpler code units within the overall execution flow, verify their correctness against the task description block by block, and efficiently pinpoint any potential errors. Experiments demonstrate that LDB consistently enhances the baseline performance by up to 9.8% across the HumanEval, MBPP, and TransCoder benchmarks, archiving new state-of-the-art performance in code debugging for various LLM selections.
6/5/2024
Visual Program Distillation: Distilling Tools and Programmatic Reasoning into Vision-Language Models
Yushi Hu, Otilia Stretcu, Chun-Ta Lu, Krishnamurthy Viswanathan, Kenji Hata, Enming Luo, Ranjay Krishna, Ariel Fuxman
0
0
Solving complex visual tasks such as Who invented the musical instrument on the right? involves a composition of skills: understanding space, recognizing instruments, and also retrieving prior knowledge. Recent work shows promise by decomposing such tasks using a large language model (LLM) into an executable program that invokes specialized vision models. However, generated programs are error-prone: they omit necessary steps, include spurious ones, and are unable to recover when the specialized models give incorrect outputs. Moreover, they require loading multiple models, incurring high latency and computation costs. We propose Visual Program Distillation (VPD), an instruction tuning framework that produces a vision-language model (VLM) capable of solving complex visual tasks with a single forward pass. VPD distills the reasoning ability of LLMs by using them to sample multiple candidate programs, which are then executed and verified to identify a correct one. It translates each correct program into a language description of the reasoning steps, which are then distilled into a VLM. Extensive experiments show that VPD improves the VLM's ability to count, understand spatial relations, and reason compositionally. Our VPD-trained PaLI-X outperforms all prior VLMs, achieving state-of-the-art performance across complex vision tasks, including MMBench, OK-VQA, A-OKVQA, TallyQA, POPE, and Hateful Memes. An evaluation with human annotators also confirms that VPD improves model response factuality and consistency. Finally, experiments on content moderation demonstrate that VPD is also helpful for adaptation to real-world applications with limited data.
4/8/2024
Program Synthesis Benchmark for Visual Programming in XLogoOnline Environment
Chao Wen, Jacqueline Staub, Adish Singla
0
0
Large language and multimodal models have shown remarkable successes on various benchmarks focused on specific skills such as general-purpose programming, natural language understanding, math word problem-solving, and visual question answering. However, it is unclear how well these models perform on tasks that require a combination of these skills. In this paper, we curate a novel program synthesis benchmark based on the XLogoOnline visual programming environment. The benchmark comprises 85 real-world tasks from the Mini-level of the XLogoOnline environment, each requiring a combination of different skills such as spatial planning, basic programming, and logical reasoning. Our evaluation shows that current state-of-the-art models like GPT-4V and Llama3-70B struggle to solve these tasks, achieving only 20% and 2.35% success rates. Next, we develop a fine-tuning pipeline to boost the performance of models by leveraging a large-scale synthetic training dataset with over 80000 tasks. Moreover, we showcase how emulator-driven feedback can be used to design a curriculum over training data distribution. We showcase that a fine-tuned Llama3-8B drastically outperforms GPT-4V and Llama3-70B models, and provide an in-depth analysis of the models' expertise across different skill dimensions. We will publicly release the benchmark for future research on program synthesis in visual programming.
6/18/2024
Self-Training Large Language Models for Improved Visual Program Synthesis With Visual Reinforcement
Zaid Khan, Vijay Kumar BG, Samuel Schulter, Yun Fu, Manmohan Chandraker
0
0
Visual program synthesis is a promising approach to exploit the reasoning abilities of large language models for compositional computer vision tasks. Previous work has used few-shot prompting with frozen LLMs to synthesize visual programs. Training an LLM to write better visual programs is an attractive prospect, but it is unclear how to accomplish this. No dataset of visual programs for training exists, and acquisition of a visual program dataset cannot be easily crowdsourced due to the need for expert annotators. To get around the lack of direct supervision, we explore improving the program synthesis abilities of an LLM using feedback from interactive experience. We propose a method where we exploit existing annotations for a vision-language task to improvise a coarse reward signal for that task, treat the LLM as a policy, and apply reinforced self-training to improve the visual program synthesis ability of the LLM for that task. We describe a series of experiments on object detection, compositional visual question answering, and image-text retrieval, and show that in each case, the self-trained LLM outperforms or performs on par with few-shot frozen LLMs that are an order of magnitude larger. Website: https://zaidkhan.me/ViReP
4/9/2024