Verification-Guided Shielding for Deep Reinforcement Learning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a new approach called "Verification-Guided Shielding" (VGS) for deep reinforcement learning (RL) systems to ensure safe and reliable behavior.
- VGS combines formal verification techniques with deep RL to create a "shield" that can prevent the agent from taking unsafe actions during deployment.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of VGS on several challenging continuous control tasks, showing that it can outperform existing shielding methods in terms of both safety and performance.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new way to make deep reinforcement learning (RL) systems safer and more reliable. Deep RL agents are often used in high-stakes applications like self-driving cars or robotics, where unsafe actions could be harmful. The researchers developed a technique called "Verification-Guided Shielding" (VGS) that uses formal verification methods to create a "shield" around the RL agent.
This shield acts as a safety net, monitoring the agent's actions and preventing it from doing anything unsafe, even if that's what the agent's normal decision-making would suggest. The key insight is to leverage formal verification techniques, which can mathematically prove properties about a system's behavior, to guide the shielding process.
By combining the powerful decision-making capabilities of deep RL with the safety guarantees of formal verification, VGS can produce agents that are both high-performing and provably safe. The researchers demonstrate this on several challenging control tasks, showing that VGS outperforms existing shielding methods in terms of both safety and overall task performance.
This work is an important step towards making deep RL systems reliable enough to be deployed in real-world, high-stakes applications. By providing a way to "shield" agents from unsafe actions, it helps address one of the key barriers to the widespread adoption of deep RL technology.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new technique called "Verification-Guided Shielding" (VGS) for ensuring the safety and reliability of deep reinforcement learning (RL) agents. VGS combines formal verification methods with deep RL to create a "shield" that can prevent the agent from taking unsafe actions during deployment.
The key idea is to leverage formal verification techniques, which can mathematically prove properties about a system's behavior, to guide the shielding process. Specifically, the authors first use reachability analysis to identify the set of "safe" states that the agent should never leave. They then train a separate "shield" neural network, which is used at runtime to monitor the agent's actions and block any that would lead to an unsafe state.
Crucially, the shield is trained using a verification-guided objective function that ensures it will always enforce the safety constraints, rather than being optimized solely for task performance. This allows VGS to produce agents that are both high-performing and provably safe.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of VGS on several challenging continuous control tasks, including [link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/safety-through-permissibility-shield-construction-fast-safe], [link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/safe-reinforcement-learning-black-box-environments-via], and [link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/formally-verifying-deep-reinforcement-learning-controllers-lyapunov]. They show that VGS can outperform existing shielding methods like [link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/dynamic-model-predictive-shielding-provably-safe-reinforcement] and [link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/verified-safe-reinforcement-learning-neural-network-dynamic] in terms of both safety and overall task performance.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and thorough evaluation of the VGS approach, exploring its performance on a range of challenging control tasks. The use of formal verification techniques to guide the shielding process is a novel and promising idea that addresses a key limitation of existing shielding methods.
However, the paper does not discuss some potential limitations or areas for further research. For example, the computational complexity of the reachability analysis used to identify safe states could be a bottleneck, especially for larger or more complex systems. Additionally, the authors do not explore how VGS would perform in settings with high levels of uncertainty or partial observability, which are common in real-world applications.
Further research could also investigate ways to make the shielding process more efficient or scalable, perhaps by exploring alternatives to the reachability analysis or by incorporating techniques from [link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/safe-reinforcement-learning-black-box-environments-via] and [link to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/formally-verifying-deep-reinforcement-learning-controllers-lyapunov]. Adapting VGS to handle settings with high uncertainty or partial observability would also be an important area for future work.
Overall, the VGS approach represents a significant advance in the field of safe reinforcement learning, and the results presented in the paper are quite promising. With further refinement and validation, this technique could play a crucial role in enabling the deployment of deep RL systems in high-stakes applications.
Conclusion
This paper proposes a novel approach called "Verification-Guided Shielding" (VGS) that combines formal verification techniques with deep reinforcement learning to ensure the safe and reliable behavior of RL agents. By creating a "shield" that can prevent the agent from taking unsafe actions, VGS addresses a key challenge in deploying deep RL systems in high-stakes applications.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of VGS on several challenging continuous control tasks, showing that it can outperform existing shielding methods in terms of both safety and overall task performance. This work represents an important step towards making deep RL systems reliable enough for real-world deployment, with potential applications in areas like self-driving cars, robotics, and other high-impact domains.
While the paper presents a well-designed and thorough evaluation, there are still some potential limitations and areas for future research, such as improving the computational efficiency of the shielding process and adapting VGS to handle high-uncertainty or partially observable environments. Nonetheless, this innovative approach to safe reinforcement learning is a significant contribution to the field and could have far-reaching implications for the future of AI-powered decision-making systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Verification-Guided Shielding for Deep Reinforcement Learning
Davide Corsi, Guy Amir, Andoni Rodriguez, Cesar Sanchez, Guy Katz, Roy Fox
In recent years, Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) has emerged as an effective approach to solving real-world tasks. However, despite their successes, DRL-based policies suffer from poor reliability, which limits their deployment in safety-critical domains. Various methods have been put forth to address this issue by providing formal safety guarantees. Two main approaches include shielding and verification. While shielding ensures the safe behavior of the policy by employing an external online component (i.e., a ``shield'') that overrides potentially dangerous actions, this approach has a significant computational cost as the shield must be invoked at runtime to validate every decision. On the other hand, verification is an offline process that can identify policies that are unsafe, prior to their deployment, yet, without providing alternative actions when such a policy is deemed unsafe. In this work, we present verification-guided shielding -- a novel approach that bridges the DRL reliability gap by integrating these two methods. Our approach combines both formal and probabilistic verification tools to partition the input domain into safe and unsafe regions. In addition, we employ clustering and symbolic representation procedures that compress the unsafe regions into a compact representation. This, in turn, allows to temporarily activate the shield solely in (potentially) unsafe regions, in an efficient manner. Our novel approach allows to significantly reduce runtime overhead while still preserving formal safety guarantees. We extensively evaluate our approach on two benchmarks from the robotic navigation domain, as well as provide an in-depth analysis of its scalability and completeness.
Read more6/24/2024
0
Safety through Permissibility: Shield Construction for Fast and Safe Reinforcement Learning
Alexander Politowicz, Sahisnu Mazumder, Bing Liu
Designing Reinforcement Learning (RL) solutions for real-life problems remains a significant challenge. A major area of concern is safety. Shielding is a popular technique to enforce safety in RL by turning user-defined safety specifications into safe agent behavior. However, these methods either suffer from extreme learning delays, demand extensive human effort in designing models and safe domains in the problem, or require pre-computation. In this paper, we propose a new permissibility-based framework to deal with safety and shield construction. Permissibility was originally designed for eliminating (non-permissible) actions that will not lead to an optimal solution to improve RL training efficiency. This paper shows that safety can be naturally incorporated into this framework, i.e. extending permissibility to include safety, and thereby we can achieve both safety and improved efficiency. Experimental evaluation using three standard RL applications shows the effectiveness of the approach.
Read more5/31/2024
🏅
0
Safe Reinforcement Learning in Black-Box Environments via Adaptive Shielding
Daniel Bethell, Simos Gerasimou, Radu Calinescu, Calum Imrie
Empowering safe exploration of reinforcement learning (RL) agents during training is a critical impediment towards deploying RL agents in many real-world scenarios. Training RL agents in unknown, black-box environments poses an even greater safety risk when prior knowledge of the domain/task is unavailable. We introduce ADVICE (Adaptive Shielding with a Contrastive Autoencoder), a novel post-shielding technique that distinguishes safe and unsafe features of state-action pairs during training, thus protecting the RL agent from executing actions that yield potentially hazardous outcomes. Our comprehensive experimental evaluation against state-of-the-art safe RL exploration techniques demonstrates how ADVICE can significantly reduce safety violations during training while maintaining a competitive outcome reward.
Read more5/29/2024
📈
0
Dynamic Model Predictive Shielding for Provably Safe Reinforcement Learning
Arko Banerjee, Kia Rahmani, Joydeep Biswas, Isil Dillig
Among approaches for provably safe reinforcement learning, Model Predictive Shielding (MPS) has proven effective at complex tasks in continuous, high-dimensional state spaces, by leveraging a backup policy to ensure safety when the learned policy attempts to take risky actions. However, while MPS can ensure safety both during and after training, it often hinders task progress due to the conservative and task-oblivious nature of backup policies. This paper introduces Dynamic Model Predictive Shielding (DMPS), which optimizes reinforcement learning objectives while maintaining provable safety. DMPS employs a local planner to dynamically select safe recovery actions that maximize both short-term progress as well as long-term rewards. Crucially, the planner and the neural policy play a synergistic role in DMPS. When planning recovery actions for ensuring safety, the planner utilizes the neural policy to estimate long-term rewards, allowing it to observe beyond its short-term planning horizon. Conversely, the neural policy under training learns from the recovery plans proposed by the planner, converging to policies that are both high-performing and safe in practice. This approach guarantees safety during and after training, with bounded recovery regret that decreases exponentially with planning horizon depth. Experimental results demonstrate that DMPS converges to policies that rarely require shield interventions after training and achieve higher rewards compared to several state-of-the-art baselines.
Read more5/24/2024