Dynamic Model Predictive Shielding for Provably Safe Reinforcement Learning

Read original: arXiv:2405.13863 - Published 5/24/2024 by Arko Banerjee, Kia Rahmani, Joydeep Biswas, Isil Dillig
Total Score

0

📈

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces Dynamic Model Predictive Shielding (DMPS), a reinforcement learning approach that optimizes task performance while ensuring safety during and after training.
  • DMPS leverages a local planner to dynamically select safe recovery actions that maximize both short-term progress and long-term rewards, working synergistically with the neural policy being trained.
  • DMPS guarantees safety with bounded recovery regret that decreases exponentially with planning horizon depth, and achieves higher rewards compared to state-of-the-art baselines.

Plain English Explanation

Dynamic Model Predictive Shielding (DMPS) is a new approach for training reinforcement learning (RL) agents to perform complex tasks safely. RL agents are often used in high-stakes environments like self-driving cars or robotics, where it's crucial they behave safely during training and once deployed.

Previous methods like Model Predictive Shielding (MPS) could ensure safety, but often limited the agent's ability to make progress on the task. DMPS aims to overcome this by using a "local planner" - a module that dynamically selects safe recovery actions the agent can take to avoid hazards, while also maximizing both short-term progress and long-term rewards.

The key insight is that the planner and the neural policy being trained work together. The planner uses the neural policy to estimate long-term rewards when deciding on recovery actions, allowing it to look beyond just the immediate future. And the neural policy learns from the recovery plans proposed by the planner, resulting in policies that are both high-performing and safe.

This approach guarantees the agent will remain safe, with a bound on how much "regret" (lost reward) occurs during recovery. Importantly, this regret decreases exponentially as the planner can look further into the future. Experiments show DMPS agents rarely need safety interventions after training and achieve higher overall rewards than previous methods.

Technical Explanation

DMPS is designed to address the limitations of prior approaches like Model Predictive Shielding (MPS) that ensure safety but often hinder task progress. DMPS employs a local planner that dynamically selects safe recovery actions to maximize both short-term progress and long-term rewards, working synergistically with the neural policy being trained.

Specifically, when planning recovery actions to ensure safety, the planner utilizes the neural policy to estimate long-term rewards. This allows the planner to look beyond its short-term planning horizon and choose actions that balance immediate safety with eventual task success. Conversely, the neural policy learns from the recovery plans proposed by the planner, converging to policies that are both high-performing and safe in practice.

This approach guarantees safety during and after training, with bounded recovery regret that decreases exponentially as the planning horizon depth increases. The paper presents theoretical analysis showing this exponential decrease in regret, as well as experimental results demonstrating DMPS agents rarely require shield interventions after training and achieve higher rewards compared to state-of-the-art baselines, including system-level safety guards and constrained RL methods.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough theoretical analysis of DMPS and demonstrates its effectiveness empirically. However, a few potential limitations and areas for further research are worth noting:

The paper focuses on continuous, high-dimensional state spaces, but it's unclear how well DMPS would scale to extremely large or complex environments. Further research may be needed to understand its performance limits.

The approach relies on an accurate dynamics model and planner, which could be challenging to obtain in real-world applications. Investigating ways to make DMPS more robust to model uncertainties would be valuable.

While the paper shows DMPS outperforms several baselines, it would be interesting to compare it to other recent advances in safe RL, such as methods that learn safety constraints or shielding policies directly from data.

Overall, DMPS represents an important step forward in the field of provably safe reinforcement learning, but continued research is needed to further improve the scalability, robustness, and generalizability of such approaches.

Conclusion

Dynamic Model Predictive Shielding (DMPS) introduces a novel approach for training reinforcement learning agents to perform complex tasks safely, both during and after training. By leveraging a local planner that dynamically selects safe recovery actions, DMPS is able to optimize task performance while guaranteeing safety with bounded recovery regret.

The synergistic relationship between the planner and the neural policy being trained is a key innovation, allowing the agent to learn policies that are both high-performing and safe in practice. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach, with DMPS agents rarely requiring safety interventions after training and achieving higher overall rewards than state-of-the-art baselines.

While DMPS represents an important step forward, continued research will be needed to further improve the scalability, robustness, and generalizability of provably safe reinforcement learning methods. Nonetheless, this work highlights the potential for such approaches to enable the safe deployment of powerful AI systems in high-stakes real-world applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📈

Total Score

0

Dynamic Model Predictive Shielding for Provably Safe Reinforcement Learning

Arko Banerjee, Kia Rahmani, Joydeep Biswas, Isil Dillig

Among approaches for provably safe reinforcement learning, Model Predictive Shielding (MPS) has proven effective at complex tasks in continuous, high-dimensional state spaces, by leveraging a backup policy to ensure safety when the learned policy attempts to take risky actions. However, while MPS can ensure safety both during and after training, it often hinders task progress due to the conservative and task-oblivious nature of backup policies. This paper introduces Dynamic Model Predictive Shielding (DMPS), which optimizes reinforcement learning objectives while maintaining provable safety. DMPS employs a local planner to dynamically select safe recovery actions that maximize both short-term progress as well as long-term rewards. Crucially, the planner and the neural policy play a synergistic role in DMPS. When planning recovery actions for ensuring safety, the planner utilizes the neural policy to estimate long-term rewards, allowing it to observe beyond its short-term planning horizon. Conversely, the neural policy under training learns from the recovery plans proposed by the planner, converging to policies that are both high-performing and safe in practice. This approach guarantees safety during and after training, with bounded recovery regret that decreases exponentially with planning horizon depth. Experimental results demonstrate that DMPS converges to policies that rarely require shield interventions after training and achieve higher rewards compared to several state-of-the-art baselines.

Read more

5/24/2024

Verification-Guided Shielding for Deep Reinforcement Learning
Total Score

0

Verification-Guided Shielding for Deep Reinforcement Learning

Davide Corsi, Guy Amir, Andoni Rodriguez, Cesar Sanchez, Guy Katz, Roy Fox

In recent years, Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) has emerged as an effective approach to solving real-world tasks. However, despite their successes, DRL-based policies suffer from poor reliability, which limits their deployment in safety-critical domains. Various methods have been put forth to address this issue by providing formal safety guarantees. Two main approaches include shielding and verification. While shielding ensures the safe behavior of the policy by employing an external online component (i.e., a ``shield'') that overrides potentially dangerous actions, this approach has a significant computational cost as the shield must be invoked at runtime to validate every decision. On the other hand, verification is an offline process that can identify policies that are unsafe, prior to their deployment, yet, without providing alternative actions when such a policy is deemed unsafe. In this work, we present verification-guided shielding -- a novel approach that bridges the DRL reliability gap by integrating these two methods. Our approach combines both formal and probabilistic verification tools to partition the input domain into safe and unsafe regions. In addition, we employ clustering and symbolic representation procedures that compress the unsafe regions into a compact representation. This, in turn, allows to temporarily activate the shield solely in (potentially) unsafe regions, in an efficient manner. Our novel approach allows to significantly reduce runtime overhead while still preserving formal safety guarantees. We extensively evaluate our approach on two benchmarks from the robotic navigation domain, as well as provide an in-depth analysis of its scalability and completeness.

Read more

6/24/2024

Safe POMDP Online Planning among Dynamic Agents via Adaptive Conformal Prediction
Total Score

0

Safe POMDP Online Planning among Dynamic Agents via Adaptive Conformal Prediction

Shili Sheng, Pian Yu, David Parker, Marta Kwiatkowska, Lu Feng

Online planning for partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) provides efficient techniques for robot decision-making under uncertainty. However, existing methods fall short of preventing safety violations in dynamic environments. This work presents a novel safe POMDP online planning approach that maximizes expected returns while providing probabilistic safety guarantees amidst environments populated by multiple dynamic agents. Our approach utilizes data-driven trajectory prediction models of dynamic agents and applies Adaptive Conformal Prediction (ACP) to quantify the uncertainties in these predictions. Leveraging the obtained ACP-based trajectory predictions, our approach constructs safety shields on-the-fly to prevent unsafe actions within POMDP online planning. Through experimental evaluation in various dynamic environments using real-world pedestrian trajectory data, the proposed approach has been shown to effectively maintain probabilistic safety guarantees while accommodating up to hundreds of dynamic agents.

Read more

9/10/2024

🏅

Total Score

0

Safe Reinforcement Learning in Black-Box Environments via Adaptive Shielding

Daniel Bethell, Simos Gerasimou, Radu Calinescu, Calum Imrie

Empowering safe exploration of reinforcement learning (RL) agents during training is a critical impediment towards deploying RL agents in many real-world scenarios. Training RL agents in unknown, black-box environments poses an even greater safety risk when prior knowledge of the domain/task is unavailable. We introduce ADVICE (Adaptive Shielding with a Contrastive Autoencoder), a novel post-shielding technique that distinguishes safe and unsafe features of state-action pairs during training, thus protecting the RL agent from executing actions that yield potentially hazardous outcomes. Our comprehensive experimental evaluation against state-of-the-art safe RL exploration techniques demonstrates how ADVICE can significantly reduce safety violations during training while maintaining a competitive outcome reward.

Read more

5/29/2024