WASH: Train your Ensemble with Communication-Efficient Weight Shuffling, then Average
2405.17517
0
0
🌿
Abstract
The performance of deep neural networks is enhanced by ensemble methods, which average the output of several models. However, this comes at an increased cost at inference. Weight averaging methods aim at balancing the generalization of ensembling and the inference speed of a single model by averaging the parameters of an ensemble of models. Yet, naive averaging results in poor performance as models converge to different loss basins, and aligning the models to improve the performance of the average is challenging. Alternatively, inspired by distributed training, methods like DART and PAPA have been proposed to train several models in parallel such that they will end up in the same basin, resulting in good averaging accuracy. However, these methods either compromise ensembling accuracy or demand significant communication between models during training. In this paper, we introduce WASH, a novel distributed method for training model ensembles for weight averaging that achieves state-of-the-art image classification accuracy. WASH maintains models within the same basin by randomly shuffling a small percentage of weights during training, resulting in diverse models and lower communication costs compared to standard parameter averaging methods.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Deep neural networks can be improved by using ensemble methods, which average the outputs of multiple models.
- Ensembling improves generalization, but increases inference cost.
- Weight averaging methods aim to balance the benefits of ensembling and the speed of a single model.
- Naive weight averaging performs poorly as models converge to different loss basins.
- Methods like DART and PAPA train models in parallel to converge to the same basin.
- However, these methods either compromise accuracy or require significant communication between models.
Plain English Explanation
Deep neural networks are powerful machine learning models that can achieve amazing results, like recognizing objects in images or translating between languages. But these models can be even better when you use an "ensemble" - a collection of several models that each make their own predictions, and then you average all those predictions together.
Ensembling is great because it helps the models generalize better and make more accurate predictions. But there's a downside - running all those models at the same time takes a lot of computing power and is slower than just using a single model.
To try to get the best of both worlds, researchers have developed "weight averaging" methods. The idea is to train several models in parallel, and then average their internal parameters (the numbers that determine how the model works) instead of just averaging their outputs. This should give you most of the benefits of ensembling, but with the speed of a single model.
The challenge is that the models might converge to different "loss basins" - basically, they might end up in different regions of the parameter space that work well, but not necessarily the same region. Averaging models in this case doesn't work very well.
Some newer methods, like DART and PAPA, try to solve this by training the models in parallel in a way that forces them to converge to the same loss basin. This works better, but it requires a lot of communication between the models during training, which can be slow and expensive.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel distributed training method called WASH (Weight-Averaged SHuffle) that aims to achieve high-accuracy image classification by training an ensemble of models that can be effectively averaged.
The key idea behind WASH is to maintain the models within the same loss basin during training, which improves the performance of the weight-averaged model. WASH achieves this by randomly shuffling a small percentage of the weights between the models during training. This encourages the models to converge to similar regions of the parameter space, without the need for extensive communication as in methods like DART and PAPA.
The authors evaluate WASH on several image classification benchmarks and show that it outperforms both naive weight averaging and state-of-the-art methods like DART, PAPA, and IMWANet in terms of classification accuracy, while requiring less communication between models during training.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach to training model ensembles for weight averaging, and the results demonstrate the effectiveness of the WASH method. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
The paper only evaluates WASH on image classification tasks, and it's unclear how well the method would generalize to other domains like natural language processing or reinforcement learning.
-
The authors don't provide much insight into the optimal percentage of weights to shuffle during training, or how this hyperparameter might be tuned for different tasks and model architectures.
-
While WASH reduces communication costs compared to methods like DART and PAPA, it still requires some coordination between the models during training. It would be interesting to explore fully decentralized methods that don't require any communication between models.
-
The paper doesn't address the potential for WASH to enable ensemble learning with heterogeneous large language models, which could be an interesting direction for future research.
Overall, the WASH method represents a promising contribution to the field of model ensembling, and the paper raises several thought-provoking questions for further exploration.
Conclusion
The paper introduces a novel distributed training method called WASH that enables high-accuracy image classification by training an ensemble of models that can be effectively averaged. WASH maintains the models within the same loss basin during training by randomly shuffling a small percentage of the weights between the models, which improves the performance of the weight-averaged model without the need for extensive communication between models.
The results demonstrate that WASH outperforms both naive weight averaging and state-of-the-art methods like DART and PAPA in terms of classification accuracy. While the method is promising, the paper also identifies potential limitations and areas for future research, such as evaluating WASH on other domains, exploring fully decentralized methods, and investigating the use of WASH to enable ensemble learning with heterogeneous large language models.
Overall, the WASH method represents an important contribution to the field of model ensembling, offering a way to balance the benefits of ensemble methods with the efficiency of a single model.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🌿
PopulAtion Parameter Averaging (PAPA)
Alexia Jolicoeur-Martineau, Emy Gervais, Kilian Fatras, Yan Zhang, Simon Lacoste-Julien
0
0
Ensemble methods combine the predictions of multiple models to improve performance, but they require significantly higher computation costs at inference time. To avoid these costs, multiple neural networks can be combined into one by averaging their weights. However, this usually performs significantly worse than ensembling. Weight averaging is only beneficial when different enough to benefit from combining them, but similar enough to average well. Based on this idea, we propose PopulAtion Parameter Averaging (PAPA): a method that combines the generality of ensembling with the efficiency of weight averaging. PAPA leverages a population of diverse models (trained on different data orders, augmentations, and regularizations) while slowly pushing the weights of the networks toward the population average of the weights. We also propose PAPA variants (PAPA-all, and PAPA-2) that average weights rarely rather than continuously; all methods increase generalization, but PAPA tends to perform best. PAPA reduces the performance gap between averaging and ensembling, increasing the average accuracy of a population of models by up to 0.8% on CIFAR-10, 1.9% on CIFAR-100, and 1.6% on ImageNet when compared to training independent (non-averaged) models.
5/7/2024
🐍
Adaptive Stochastic Weight Averaging
Caglar Demir, Arnab Sharma, Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo
0
0
Ensemble models often improve generalization performances in challenging tasks. Yet, traditional techniques based on prediction averaging incur three well-known disadvantages: the computational overhead of training multiple models, increased latency, and memory requirements at test time. To address these issues, the Stochastic Weight Averaging (SWA) technique maintains a running average of model parameters from a specific epoch onward. Despite its potential benefits, maintaining a running average of parameters can hinder generalization, as an underlying running model begins to overfit. Conversely, an inadequately chosen starting point can render SWA more susceptible to underfitting compared to an underlying running model. In this work, we propose Adaptive Stochastic Weight Averaging (ASWA) technique that updates a running average of model parameters, only when generalization performance is improved on the validation dataset. Hence, ASWA can be seen as a combination of SWA with the early stopping technique, where the former accepts all updates on a parameter ensemble model and the latter rejects any update on an underlying running model. We conducted extensive experiments ranging from image classification to multi-hop reasoning over knowledge graphs. Our experiments over 11 benchmark datasets with 7 baseline models suggest that ASWA leads to a statistically better generalization across models and datasets
6/28/2024
🏷️
Optimizing the Optimal Weighted Average: Efficient Distributed Sparse Classification
Fred Lu, Ryan R. Curtin, Edward Raff, Francis Ferraro, James Holt
0
0
While distributed training is often viewed as a solution to optimizing linear models on increasingly large datasets, inter-machine communication costs of popular distributed approaches can dominate as data dimensionality increases. Recent work on non-interactive algorithms shows that approximate solutions for linear models can be obtained efficiently with only a single round of communication among machines. However, this approximation often degenerates as the number of machines increases. In this paper, building on the recent optimal weighted average method, we introduce a new technique, ACOWA, that allows an extra round of communication to achieve noticeably better approximation quality with minor runtime increases. Results show that for sparse distributed logistic regression, ACOWA obtains solutions that are more faithful to the empirical risk minimizer and attain substantially higher accuracy than other distributed algorithms.
6/5/2024
Bayesian vs. PAC-Bayesian Deep Neural Network Ensembles
Nick Hauptvogel, Christian Igel
0
0
Bayesian neural networks address epistemic uncertainty by learning a posterior distribution over model parameters. Sampling and weighting networks according to this posterior yields an ensemble model referred to as Bayes ensemble. Ensembles of neural networks (deep ensembles) can profit from the cancellation of errors effect: Errors by ensemble members may average out and the deep ensemble achieves better predictive performance than each individual network. We argue that neither the sampling nor the weighting in a Bayes ensemble are particularly well-suited for increasing generalization performance, as they do not support the cancellation of errors effect, which is evident in the limit from the Bernstein-von~Mises theorem for misspecified models. In contrast, a weighted average of models where the weights are optimized by minimizing a PAC-Bayesian generalization bound can improve generalization performance. This requires that the optimization takes correlations between models into account, which can be achieved by minimizing the tandem loss at the cost that hold-out data for estimating error correlations need to be available. The PAC-Bayesian weighting increases the robustness against correlated models and models with lower performance in an ensemble. This allows us to safely add several models from the same learning process to an ensemble, instead of using early-stopping for selecting a single weight configuration. Our study presents empirical results supporting these conceptual considerations on four different classification datasets. We show that state-of-the-art Bayes ensembles from the literature, despite being computationally demanding, do not improve over simple uniformly weighted deep ensembles and cannot match the performance of deep ensembles weighted by optimizing the tandem loss, which additionally come with non-vacuous generalization guarantees.
6/11/2024