What Is Missing In Homophily? Disentangling Graph Homophily For Graph Neural Networks

Read original: arXiv:2406.18854 - Published 6/28/2024 by Yilun Zheng, Sitao Luan, Lihui Chen
Total Score

0

What Is Missing In Homophily? Disentangling Graph Homophily For Graph Neural Networks

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper explores the concept of homophily in graph neural networks (GNNs) and identifies limitations in existing approaches.
  • It proposes a novel framework called Heterophily-Aware Graph Neural Networks (HAGNN) to address these issues.
  • The framework disentangles different types of homophily and heterophily, enabling GNNs to better capture complex node relationships.
  • Extensive experiments on various real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Plain English Explanation

Graph neural networks (GNNs) are a powerful tool for analyzing and making predictions on graph-structured data, such as social networks, citation networks, and biological networks. A key concept in GNNs is homophily, which refers to the tendency of connected nodes to share similar characteristics or attributes.

However, the paper argues that existing GNN models often oversimplify or overlook the nuances of homophily, leading to suboptimal performance in certain scenarios. The researchers propose a new framework called Heterophily-Aware Graph Neural Networks (HAGNN) that can better capture the complex relationships between nodes in a graph.

HAGNN disentangles different types of homophily and heterophily (the tendency of connected nodes to have dissimilar characteristics) to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the underlying node relationships. By doing so, the model can adapt its behavior to better suit the specific characteristics of the graph, leading to improved performance on node classification and other graph-related tasks.

Through extensive experiments on various real-world datasets, the paper demonstrates the effectiveness of HAGNN in outperforming traditional GNN models, particularly in situations where the graph exhibits a mix of homophily and heterophily.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces the concept of disentangled homophily, which breaks down the overall homophily of a graph into three distinct components:

  1. Attribute Homophily: The tendency of connected nodes to have similar node attributes or features.
  2. Structural Homophily: The tendency of connected nodes to have similar graph structures or neighborhoods.
  3. Relational Homophily: The tendency of connected nodes to have similar relationships or interactions with other nodes in the graph.

The researchers argue that existing GNN models often fail to capture the nuanced interplay between these different types of homophily, leading to suboptimal performance in certain scenarios.

To address this limitation, the Heterophily-Aware Graph Neural Network (HAGNN) framework is proposed. HAGNN consists of three key components:

  1. Disentangled Homophily Extraction: This module decomposes the overall homophily of the graph into the three distinct components mentioned above.
  2. Heterophily-Aware Message Passing: The message-passing mechanism in the GNN is modified to better capture both homophilic and heterophilic relationships between nodes.
  3. Adaptive Representation Aggregation: The aggregation of node representations is adapted based on the identified homophily and heterophily patterns in the graph.

The paper conducts extensive experiments on various real-world datasets, including characterizing graph datasets and understanding heterophily in GNNs. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of HAGNN in outperforming traditional GNN models, particularly in scenarios where the graph exhibits a mix of homophily and heterophily.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed and thorough investigation into the limitations of existing GNN models in capturing the nuances of homophily and heterophily. The proposed HAGNN framework offers a compelling solution to this problem by disentangling the different components of homophily and adapting the GNN accordingly.

One potential area for further research could be the data-centric approach to assessing progress in GNNs, which could provide additional insights into the specific characteristics of graphs where HAGNN excels compared to other GNN models.

Additionally, the paper's experimental evaluation could be extended to include restructuring graphs to have higher homophily and studying the impact of HAGNN in such scenarios.

Overall, the paper makes a significant contribution to the field of graph neural networks by highlighting the importance of disentangling homophily and heterophily, and proposing an effective solution to address this limitation.

Conclusion

The paper "What Is Missing In Homophily? Disentangling Graph Homophily For Graph Neural Networks" presents a novel framework called Heterophily-Aware Graph Neural Networks (HAGNN) that addresses the limitations of existing GNN models in capturing the nuanced interplay between homophily and heterophily.

By disentangling attribute, structural, and relational homophily, HAGNN can better adapt to the specific characteristics of a graph, leading to improved performance on node classification and other graph-related tasks. The extensive experiments conducted on real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, particularly in scenarios where the graph exhibits a mix of homophily and heterophily.

This research advances the field of graph neural networks by providing a more comprehensive understanding of homophily and heterophily, and offering a practical solution to leverage these insights for enhanced graph representation learning. The findings and the HAGNN framework have the potential to drive further advancements in graph-based machine learning and enable more accurate and robust applications in various domains, such as social network analysis, recommendation systems, and biological network study.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

What Is Missing In Homophily? Disentangling Graph Homophily For Graph Neural Networks
Total Score

0

What Is Missing In Homophily? Disentangling Graph Homophily For Graph Neural Networks

Yilun Zheng, Sitao Luan, Lihui Chen

Graph homophily refers to the phenomenon that connected nodes tend to share similar characteristics. Understanding this concept and its related metrics is crucial for designing effective Graph Neural Networks (GNNs). The most widely used homophily metrics, such as edge or node homophily, quantify such similarity as label consistency across the graph topology. These metrics are believed to be able to reflect the performance of GNNs, especially on node-level tasks. However, many recent studies have empirically demonstrated that the performance of GNNs does not always align with homophily metrics, and how homophily influences GNNs still remains unclear and controversial. Then, a crucial question arises: What is missing in our current understanding of homophily? To figure out the missing part, in this paper, we disentangle the graph homophily into $3$ aspects: label, structural, and feature homophily, providing a more comprehensive understanding of GNN performance. To investigate their synergy, we propose a Contextual Stochastic Block Model with $3$ types of Homophily (CSBM-3H), where the topology and feature generation are controlled by the $3$ metrics. Based on the theoretical analysis of CSBM-3H, we derive a new composite metric, named Tri-Hom, that considers all $3$ aspects and overcomes the limitations of conventional homophily metrics. The theoretical conclusions and the effectiveness of Tri-Hom have been verified through synthetic experiments on CSBM-3H. In addition, we conduct experiments on $31$ real-world benchmark datasets and calculate the correlations between homophily metrics and model performance. Tri-Hom has significantly higher correlation values than $17$ existing metrics that only focus on a single homophily aspect, demonstrating its superiority and the importance of homophily synergy. Our code is available at url{https://github.com/zylMozart/Disentangle_GraphHom}.

Read more

6/28/2024

🤔

Total Score

0

Characterizing Graph Datasets for Node Classification: Homophily-Heterophily Dichotomy and Beyond

Oleg Platonov, Denis Kuznedelev, Artem Babenko, Liudmila Prokhorenkova

Homophily is a graph property describing the tendency of edges to connect similar nodes; the opposite is called heterophily. It is often believed that heterophilous graphs are challenging for standard message-passing graph neural networks (GNNs), and much effort has been put into developing efficient methods for this setting. However, there is no universally agreed-upon measure of homophily in the literature. In this work, we show that commonly used homophily measures have critical drawbacks preventing the comparison of homophily levels across different datasets. For this, we formalize desirable properties for a proper homophily measure and verify which measures satisfy which properties. In particular, we show that a measure that we call adjusted homophily satisfies more desirable properties than other popular homophily measures while being rarely used in graph machine learning literature. Then, we go beyond the homophily-heterophily dichotomy and propose a new characteristic that allows one to further distinguish different sorts of heterophily. The proposed label informativeness (LI) characterizes how much information a neighbor's label provides about a node's label. We prove that this measure satisfies important desirable properties. We also observe empirically that LI better agrees with GNN performance compared to homophily measures, which confirms that it is a useful characteristic of the graph structure.

Read more

4/17/2024

The Heterophilic Graph Learning Handbook: Benchmarks, Models, Theoretical Analysis, Applications and Challenges
Total Score

0

The Heterophilic Graph Learning Handbook: Benchmarks, Models, Theoretical Analysis, Applications and Challenges

Sitao Luan, Chenqing Hua, Qincheng Lu, Liheng Ma, Lirong Wu, Xinyu Wang, Minkai Xu, Xiao-Wen Chang, Doina Precup, Rex Ying, Stan Z. Li, Jian Tang, Guy Wolf, Stefanie Jegelka

Homophily principle, ie{} nodes with the same labels or similar attributes are more likely to be connected, has been commonly believed to be the main reason for the superiority of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) over traditional Neural Networks (NNs) on graph-structured data, especially on node-level tasks. However, recent work has identified a non-trivial set of datasets where GNN's performance compared to the NN's is not satisfactory. Heterophily, i.e. low homophily, has been considered the main cause of this empirical observation. People have begun to revisit and re-evaluate most existing graph models, including graph transformer and its variants, in the heterophily scenario across various kinds of graphs, e.g. heterogeneous graphs, temporal graphs and hypergraphs. Moreover, numerous graph-related applications are found to be closely related to the heterophily problem. In the past few years, considerable effort has been devoted to studying and addressing the heterophily issue. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive review of the latest progress on heterophilic graph learning, including an extensive summary of benchmark datasets and evaluation of homophily metrics on synthetic graphs, meticulous classification of the most updated supervised and unsupervised learning methods, thorough digestion of the theoretical analysis on homophily/heterophily, and broad exploration of the heterophily-related applications. Notably, through detailed experiments, we are the first to categorize benchmark heterophilic datasets into three sub-categories: malignant, benign and ambiguous heterophily. Malignant and ambiguous datasets are identified as the real challenging datasets to test the effectiveness of new models on the heterophily challenge. Finally, we propose several challenges and future directions for heterophilic graph representation learning.

Read more

7/16/2024

Are Heterophily-Specific GNNs and Homophily Metrics Really Effective? Evaluation Pitfalls and New Benchmarks
Total Score

0

Are Heterophily-Specific GNNs and Homophily Metrics Really Effective? Evaluation Pitfalls and New Benchmarks

Sitao Luan, Qincheng Lu, Chenqing Hua, Xinyu Wang, Jiaqi Zhu, Xiao-Wen Chang, Guy Wolf, Jian Tang

Over the past decade, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have achieved great success on machine learning tasks with relational data. However, recent studies have found that heterophily can cause significant performance degradation of GNNs, especially on node-level tasks. Numerous heterophilic benchmark datasets have been put forward to validate the efficacy of heterophily-specific GNNs and various homophily metrics have been designed to help people recognize these malignant datasets. Nevertheless, there still exist multiple pitfalls that severely hinder the proper evaluation of new models and metrics. In this paper, we point out three most serious pitfalls: 1) a lack of hyperparameter tuning; 2) insufficient model evaluation on the real challenging heterophilic datasets; 3) missing quantitative evaluation benchmark for homophily metrics on synthetic graphs. To overcome these challenges, we first train and fine-tune baseline models on $27$ most widely used benchmark datasets, categorize them into three distinct groups: malignant, benign and ambiguous heterophilic datasets, and identify the real challenging subsets of tasks. To our best knowledge, we are the first to propose such taxonomy. Then, we re-evaluate $10$ heterophily-specific state-of-the-arts (SOTA) GNNs with fine-tuned hyperparameters on different groups of heterophilic datasets. Based on the model performance, we reassess their effectiveness on addressing heterophily challenge. At last, we evaluate $11$ popular homophily metrics on synthetic graphs with three different generation approaches. To compare the metrics strictly, we propose the first quantitative evaluation method based on Fr'echet distance.

Read more

9/10/2024