Which algorithm to select in sports timetabling?
0
🔍
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Sports competitions require a timetable to schedule when and where teams meet each other.
- The recent International Timetabling Competition (ITC2021) on sports timetabling showed that general algorithms can be developed, but their performance varies greatly across different problem instances.
- This paper provides an instance space analysis for sports timetabling, revealing insights into the strengths and weaknesses of eight state-of-the-art algorithms.
- The researchers propose an algorithm selection system that predicts which algorithm is likely to perform best based on the characteristics of a sports timetabling problem instance.
- The paper also identifies which characteristics are important for making these predictions, offering insights into algorithm performance and suggestions for improvement.
- Finally, the paper assesses the empirical hardness of the problem instances.
Plain English Explanation
In any sports competition, a timetable is needed to specify when and where teams will play each other. The recent International Timetabling Competition (ITC2021) on sports timetabling showed that while it's possible to develop general algorithms to create these timetables, the performance of each algorithm can vary a lot depending on the specific problem instance.
This paper takes a closer look at this issue, using machine learning techniques to analyze the characteristics of different sports timetabling problem instances. The goal is to understand the strengths and weaknesses of eight state-of-the-art algorithms used for this task. By identifying the key characteristics that influence algorithm performance, the researchers were able to develop a system that can predict which algorithm is likely to work best for a given timetabling problem.
The paper also provides insights into the overall difficulty of the sports timetabling problem, assessing the "hardness" of the various problem instances based on large-scale computational experiments. This information could be valuable for sports organizers and researchers looking to improve timetabling algorithms in the future.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents an instance space analysis for sports timetabling, using machine learning techniques to study the performance of eight state-of-the-art algorithms across a diverse set of problem instances.
The researchers first generated a large dataset of over 500 new sports timetabling problem instances, representing a wide range of characteristics. They then ran extensive computational experiments, consuming about 50 years of CPU time, to evaluate the performance of the eight algorithms on this dataset.
Using the results of these experiments, the team developed an algorithm selection system that can predict which algorithm is likely to perform best for a given problem instance, based on its characteristics. This system leverages machine learning to identify the key features that influence algorithm performance.
The paper also provides insights into the relative strengths and weaknesses of the eight algorithms, suggesting ways they could be further improved. Additionally, the researchers assess the empirical hardness of the problem instances, giving sports organizers and researchers a better understanding of the challenges involved in sports timetabling.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a comprehensive analysis of sports timetabling algorithms, using a rigorous experimental approach to generate valuable insights. However, the researchers acknowledge that their study is limited to a specific set of algorithms and problem instances, and that further research may be needed to generalize the findings.
Additionally, while the algorithm selection system developed in the paper shows promise, its practical implementation may depend on the availability of accurate data on the characteristics of real-world sports timetabling problems. The researchers suggest that future work could focus on developing methods to automatically extract these characteristics from problem descriptions.
Another potential area for further research is the exploration of alternative algorithms or hybrid approaches that could outperform the individual algorithms studied in this paper. The insights gained from the instance space analysis could inform the design of such new algorithms.
Conclusion
This paper provides a detailed analysis of sports timetabling algorithms, using a large-scale computational study to uncover the strengths, weaknesses, and performance characteristics of eight state-of-the-art approaches. The researchers' development of an algorithm selection system, which can predict the best-performing algorithm for a given problem instance, is a significant contribution to the field.
The insights gained from this work can inform the design of improved timetabling algorithms, as well as guide sports organizers in selecting the most appropriate algorithms for their specific needs. By better understanding the factors that influence algorithm performance, the research community can continue to advance the state of the art in this important area of sports logistics and scheduling.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔍
0
Which algorithm to select in sports timetabling?
David Van Bulck, Dries Goossens, Jan-Patrick Clarner, Angelos Dimitsas, George H. G. Fonseca, Carlos Lamas-Fernandez, Martin Mariusz Lester, Jaap Pedersen, Antony E. Phillips, Roberto Maria Rosati
Any sports competition needs a timetable, specifying when and where teams meet each other. The recent International Timetabling Competition (ITC2021) on sports timetabling showed that, although it is possible to develop general algorithms, the performance of each algorithm varies considerably over the problem instances. This paper provides an instance space analysis for sports timetabling, resulting in powerful insights into the strengths and weaknesses of eight state-of-the-art algorithms. Based on machine learning techniques, we propose an algorithm selection system that predicts which algorithm is likely to perform best when given the characteristics of a sports timetabling problem instance. Furthermore, we identify which characteristics are important in making that prediction, providing insights in the performance of the algorithms, and suggestions to further improve them. Finally, we assess the empirical hardness of the instances. Our results are based on large computational experiments involving about 50 years of CPU time on more than 500 newly generated problem instances.
Read more7/8/2024
0
Frugal Algorithm Selection
Erdem Kuc{s}, Ozgur Akgun, Nguyen Dang, Ian Miguel
When solving decision and optimisation problems, many competing algorithms (model and solver choices) have complementary strengths. Typically, there is no single algorithm that works well for all instances of a problem. Automated algorithm selection has been shown to work very well for choosing a suitable algorithm for a given instance. However, the cost of training can be prohibitively large due to running candidate algorithms on a representative set of training instances. In this work, we explore reducing this cost by choosing a subset of the training instances on which to train. We approach this problem in three ways: using active learning to decide based on prediction uncertainty, augmenting the algorithm predictors with a timeout predictor, and collecting training data using a progressively increasing timeout. We evaluate combinations of these approaches on six datasets from ASLib and present the reduction in labelling cost achieved by each option.
Read more5/21/2024
📈
0
Toward Smart Scheduling in Tapis
Joe Stubbs, Smruti Padhy, Richard Cardone
The Tapis framework provides APIs for automating job execution on remote resources, including HPC clusters and servers running in the cloud. Tapis can simplify the interaction with remote cyberinfrastructure (CI), but the current services require users to specify the exact configuration of a job to run, including the system, queue, node count, and maximum run time, among other attributes. Moreover, the remote resources must be defined and configured in Tapis before a job can be submitted. In this paper, we present our efforts to develop an intelligent job scheduling capability in Tapis, where various attributes about a job configuration can be automatically determined for the user, and computational resources can be dynamically provisioned by Tapis for specific jobs. We develop an overall architecture for such a feature, which suggests a set of core challenges to be solved. Then, we focus on one such specific challenge: predicting queue times for a job on different HPC systems and queues, and we present two sets of results based on machine learning methods. Our first set of results cast the problem as a regression, which can be used to select the best system from a list of existing options. Our second set of results frames the problem as a classification, allowing us to compare the use of an existing system with a dynamically provisioned resource.
Read more8/9/2024
0
Comparing Task Graph Scheduling Algorithms: An Adversarial Approach
Jared Coleman, Bhaskar Krishnamachari
Scheduling a task graph representing an application over a heterogeneous network of computers is a fundamental problem in distributed computing. It is known to be not only NP-hard but also not polynomial-time approximable within a constant factor. As a result, many heuristic algorithms have been proposed over the past few decades. Yet it remains largely unclear how these algorithms compare to each other in terms of the quality of schedules they produce. We identify gaps in the traditional benchmarking approach to comparing task scheduling algorithms and propose a simulated annealing-based adversarial analysis approach called PISA to help address them. We also introduce SAGA, a new open-source library for comparing task scheduling algorithms. We use SAGA to benchmark 15 algorithms on 16 datasets and PISA to compare the algorithms in a pairwise manner. Algorithms that appear to perform similarly on benchmarking datasets are shown to perform very differently on adversarially chosen problem instances. Interestingly, the results indicate that this is true even when the adversarial search is constrained to selecting among well-structured, application-specific problem instances. This work represents an important step towards a more general understanding of the performance boundaries between task scheduling algorithms on different families of problem instances.
Read more6/12/2024