Which Information Matters? Dissecting Human-written Multi-document Summaries with Partial Information Decomposition

Overview

• The paper explores how to characterize high-quality multi-document summaries using information decomposition techniques.
• The authors propose an approach that decomposes the mutual information provided by all source documents into union, redundancy, synergy, and unique information.
• Their analysis on different multi-document summarization (MDS) datasets shows a direct relationship between the number of sources and their contribution to the summary.

Plain English Explanation

When writing summaries that combine information from multiple documents, understanding what makes a high-quality summary is crucial for improving the performance of these multi-document summarization (MDS) systems. The authors of this paper introduce a novel approach to analyze the characteristics of human-written summaries using a technique called partial information decomposition.

This decomposition method breaks down the total information provided by all the source documents into four key components:

1. Union information: The combined unique information from all the sources.
2. Redundancy: The overlapping information that is repeated across the sources.
3. Synergy: The new insights that emerge from the interaction between the sources.
4. Unique information: The distinct information contributed by individual sources.

The researchers' analysis of different MDS datasets reveals a direct connection between the number of source documents and the relative contributions of these four information components to the final summary. This suggests that the way humans combine information from multiple sources to create high-quality summaries is a complex process that depends on the diversity and complementarity of the input materials.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes an approach to characterize human-written multi-document summaries using partial information decomposition (PID). PID is a technique that decomposes the mutual information provided by a set of source documents into four distinct components: union, redundancy, synergy, and unique information.

The authors apply this PID-based analysis to different MDS datasets, including TAC 2010, TAC 2011, and DUC 2007. Their empirical results show that as the number of source documents increases, the relative contributions of these four information components to the final summary also change. Specifically, they find that:

1. Union information tends to increase with more source documents, as the summary captures a broader scope of information.
2. Redundancy also grows, as there is more overlapping content across the sources.
3. Synergy, or the emergent insights from the combined sources, tends to be higher with more documents.
4. The unique information contributed by individual sources decreases as the number of sources increases.

These findings suggest that the way humans create high-quality multi-document summaries involves a complex interplay between leveraging the diverse information from multiple sources, identifying the common themes and redundancies, and extracting the novel insights that arise from the synthesis of the source materials.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a novel and insightful approach to characterizing the nature of high-quality multi-document summaries. The use of partial information decomposition offers a principled way to quantify the different information components that contribute to an effective summary.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations of this approach. For example, the PID analysis relies on accurate estimation of mutual information, which can be challenging, especially as the number of source documents increases. Additionally, the paper does not explore how the quality or relevance of the source documents might influence the resulting summary characteristics.

Further research could investigate the role of summary content units in text summarization evaluation or methods for mitigating hallucination in abstractive summarization. Exploring how the PID-based analysis relates to these other aspects of summary quality could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the factors that contribute to high-quality multi-document summaries.

Additionally, the paper could have benefited from a deeper discussion of the methods for measuring redundancy and information from a source failure perspective, which could shed light on the nature of the redundancy observed in the PID analysis.

Overall, the paper presents a valuable contribution to the understanding of multi-document summarization by introducing a novel analytical approach. Further research building on this work could lead to improved techniques for disentangling instructive information from ranked multiple candidates in the summarization process.

Conclusion

This paper proposes a novel approach to characterizing the nature of high-quality multi-document summaries using partial information decomposition. The analysis reveals a direct relationship between the number of source documents and the relative contributions of union, redundancy, synergy, and unique information to the final summary.

These findings offer important insights into the complex process of how humans synthesize information from multiple sources to create effective summaries. The paper's approach provides a principled framework for further exploring the factors that influence summary quality, which could lead to improved multi-document summarization systems in the future.