WorldValuesBench: A Large-Scale Benchmark Dataset for Multi-Cultural Value Awareness of Language Models

2404.16308

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/26/2024 by Wenlong Zhao, Debanjan Mondal, Niket Tandon, Danica Dillion, Kurt Gray, Yuling Gu

💬

Abstract

The awareness of multi-cultural human values is critical to the ability of language models (LMs) to generate safe and personalized responses. However, this awareness of LMs has been insufficiently studied, since the computer science community lacks access to the large-scale real-world data about multi-cultural values. In this paper, we present WorldValuesBench, a globally diverse, large-scale benchmark dataset for the multi-cultural value prediction task, which requires a model to generate a rating response to a value question based on demographic contexts. Our dataset is derived from an influential social science project, World Values Survey (WVS), that has collected answers to hundreds of value questions (e.g., social, economic, ethical) from 94,728 participants worldwide. We have constructed more than 20 million examples of the type (demographic attributes, value question) $rightarrow$ answer from the WVS responses. We perform a case study using our dataset and show that the task is challenging for strong open and closed-source models. On merely $11.1%$, $25.0%$, $72.2%$, and $75.0%$ of the questions, Alpaca-7B, Vicuna-7B-v1.5, Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1, and GPT-3.5 Turbo can respectively achieve $<0.2$ Wasserstein 1-distance from the human normalized answer distributions. WorldValuesBench opens up new research avenues in studying limitations and opportunities in multi-cultural value awareness of LMs.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a new benchmark dataset called WorldValuesBench, which is designed to evaluate how well language models can understand and predict diverse cultural values around the world.
  • The dataset is derived from the World Values Survey, a large-scale social science project that has collected responses to hundreds of value questions from over 94,000 participants globally.
  • The paper demonstrates that existing language models struggle with this multi-cultural value prediction task, highlighting the need for further research into improving cultural awareness in AI systems.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers behind this paper recognized that for language models (LMs) to generate safe and personalized responses, they need to have a strong understanding of diverse human values across cultures. However, they found that this type of cultural awareness has not been well-studied in the computer science community, likely due to a lack of access to large-scale, real-world data on multi-cultural values.

To address this gap, the researchers created a new dataset called WorldValuesBench. This dataset is derived from the World Values Survey (WVS), a widely respected social science project that has collected answers to hundreds of questions about social, economic, and ethical values from over 94,000 people around the world.

Using the WVS data, the researchers constructed more than 20 million examples, each consisting of a person's demographic attributes (e.g., age, gender, location) and a value question, paired with the person's answer to that question. This dataset provides a comprehensive resource for training and evaluating language models on their ability to understand and predict diverse cultural values.

The researchers then conducted a case study using several strong language models, including Alpaca-7B, Vicuna-7B-v1.5, Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1, and GPT-3.5 Turbo. The results showed that these models struggled to accurately predict the human-provided answers, achieving low levels of performance on the task.

This study highlights the significant challenges that language models face in understanding and representing the diverse range of cultural values present in the real world. By providing the WorldValuesBench dataset, the researchers hope to spur further research into improving the cultural awareness and sensitivity of AI systems, which is critical for their safe and ethical deployment in real-world applications.

Technical Explanation

The researchers created the WorldValuesBench dataset by leveraging the extensive data collected through the World Values Survey (WVS), a long-running global study of human values and beliefs. The WVS has gathered responses to hundreds of value-related questions from 94,728 participants across 80 countries.

From this WVS data, the researchers constructed more than 20 million examples, each consisting of a person's demographic attributes (e.g., age, gender, location) and a value question, paired with the person's answer to that question. This large-scale, globally diverse dataset provides a comprehensive resource for training and evaluating language models on their ability to understand and predict diverse cultural values.

The researchers then conducted a case study using several prominent language models, including Alpaca-7B, Vicuna-7B-v1.5, Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1, and GPT-3.5 Turbo. The task was to generate a rating response to a value question based on the provided demographic context.

The results of the case study were sobering, as the language models struggled to accurately predict the human-provided answers. On only 11.1%, 25.0%, 72.2%, and 75.0% of the questions could Alpaca-7B, Vicuna-7B-v1.5, Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1, and GPT-3.5 Turbo, respectively, achieve a Wasserstein 1-distance of less than 0.2 from the human-normalized answer distributions.

These findings clearly demonstrate the significant challenges that language models face in understanding and representing the diverse range of cultural values present in the real world. The WorldValuesBench dataset provides a valuable resource for further research into improving the cultural awareness and sensitivity of AI systems, which is crucial for their safe and ethical deployment in real-world applications.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research in their work. Firstly, they note that the WorldValuesBench dataset, while globally diverse, may not be fully representative of all cultures and value systems around the world. There may be gaps or biases in the data that could limit the generalizability of the findings.

Additionally, the researchers highlight the need for more research into the specific mechanisms and architectures that would enable language models to better capture and reason about multi-cultural values. The case study presented in the paper suggests that current state-of-the-art models struggle with this task, but does not provide clear insights into the underlying reasons for their poor performance.

One potential concern that the researchers do not address is the potential for misuse of the WorldValuesBench dataset. If used irresponsibly, the dataset could be leveraged to train language models that reinforce harmful stereotypes or biases about different cultures and value systems. Careful consideration should be given to the ethical implications of this research and the responsible use of such datasets.

Furthermore, the researchers do not provide a deep analysis of the types of value questions or demographics that proved most challenging for the language models. A more nuanced understanding of the specific areas of weakness could help inform future research and development efforts in this domain.

Despite these limitations, the WorldValuesBench dataset and the researchers' findings represent an important step forward in understanding the cultural awareness and sensitivity of language models. By drawing attention to this critical issue and providing a valuable resource for further investigation, the paper opens up new avenues for research that could ultimately lead to the development of AI systems that are more inclusive, respectful, and attuned to the diversity of human values worldwide.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel benchmark dataset called WorldValuesBench, which is designed to evaluate the ability of language models to understand and predict diverse cultural values around the world. By leveraging the extensive data collected through the World Values Survey, the researchers have created a comprehensive resource for studying the multi-cultural value awareness of AI systems.

The case study conducted in the paper demonstrates that current state-of-the-art language models struggle with this task, highlighting the significant challenges they face in accurately representing the diverse range of human values present in the real world. This research underscores the critical need for further investigation into improving the cultural sensitivity and awareness of AI systems, which is essential for their safe and ethical deployment in real-world applications.

By providing the WorldValuesBench dataset and sharing their findings, the researchers have opened up new research avenues in this important and underexplored area of AI development. As the field continues to grapple with the societal implications of language models and other AI technologies, studies like this one will play a crucial role in guiding the development of more inclusive, personalized, and culturally-aware AI systems that can better serve the needs of diverse global populations.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

ValueBench: Towards Comprehensively Evaluating Value Orientations and Understanding of Large Language Models

ValueBench: Towards Comprehensively Evaluating Value Orientations and Understanding of Large Language Models

Yuanyi Ren, Haoran Ye, Hanjun Fang, Xin Zhang, Guojie Song

YC

0

Reddit

0

Large Language Models (LLMs) are transforming diverse fields and gaining increasing influence as human proxies. This development underscores the urgent need for evaluating value orientations and understanding of LLMs to ensure their responsible integration into public-facing applications. This work introduces ValueBench, the first comprehensive psychometric benchmark for evaluating value orientations and value understanding in LLMs. ValueBench collects data from 44 established psychometric inventories, encompassing 453 multifaceted value dimensions. We propose an evaluation pipeline grounded in realistic human-AI interactions to probe value orientations, along with novel tasks for evaluating value understanding in an open-ended value space. With extensive experiments conducted on six representative LLMs, we unveil their shared and distinctive value orientations and exhibit their ability to approximate expert conclusions in value-related extraction and generation tasks. ValueBench is openly accessible at https://github.com/Value4AI/ValueBench.

Read more

6/7/2024

BLEnD: A Benchmark for LLMs on Everyday Knowledge in Diverse Cultures and Languages

BLEnD: A Benchmark for LLMs on Everyday Knowledge in Diverse Cultures and Languages

Junho Myung, Nayeon Lee, Yi Zhou, Jiho Jin, Rifki Afina Putri, Dimosthenis Antypas, Hsuvas Borkakoty, Eunsu Kim, Carla Perez-Almendros, Abinew Ali Ayele, V'ictor Guti'errez-Basulto, Yazm'in Ib'a~nez-Garc'ia, Hwaran Lee, Shamsuddeen Hassan Muhammad, Kiwoong Park, Anar Sabuhi Rzayev, Nina White, Seid Muhie Yimam, Mohammad Taher Pilehvar, Nedjma Ousidhoum, Jose Camacho-Collados, Alice Oh

YC

0

Reddit

0

Large language models (LLMs) often lack culture-specific knowledge of daily life, especially across diverse regions and non-English languages. Existing benchmarks for evaluating LLMs' cultural sensitivities are limited to a single language or collected from online sources such as Wikipedia, which do not reflect the mundane everyday lifestyles of diverse regions. That is, information about the food people eat for their birthday celebrations, spices they typically use, musical instruments youngsters play, or the sports they practice in school is common cultural knowledge but uncommon in easily collected online sources, especially for underrepresented cultures. To address this issue, we introduce BLEnD, a hand-crafted benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs' everyday knowledge across diverse cultures and languages. BLEnD comprises 52.6k question-answer pairs from 16 countries/regions, in 13 different languages, including low-resource ones such as Amharic, Assamese, Azerbaijani, Hausa, and Sundanese. We construct the benchmark to include two formats of questions: short-answer and multiple-choice. We show that LLMs perform better for cultures that are highly represented online, with a maximum 57.34% difference in GPT-4, the best-performing model, in the short-answer format. For cultures represented by mid-to-high-resource languages, LLMs perform better in their local languages, but for cultures represented by low-resource languages, LLMs perform better in English than the local languages. We make our dataset publicly available at: https://github.com/nlee0212/BLEnD.

Read more

6/17/2024

💬

CIVICS: Building a Dataset for Examining Culturally-Informed Values in Large Language Models

Giada Pistilli, Alina Leidinger, Yacine Jernite, Atoosa Kasirzadeh, Alexandra Sasha Luccioni, Margaret Mitchell

YC

0

Reddit

0

This paper introduces the CIVICS: Culturally-Informed & Values-Inclusive Corpus for Societal impacts dataset, designed to evaluate the social and cultural variation of Large Language Models (LLMs) across multiple languages and value-sensitive topics. We create a hand-crafted, multilingual dataset of value-laden prompts which address specific socially sensitive topics, including LGBTQI rights, social welfare, immigration, disability rights, and surrogacy. CIVICS is designed to generate responses showing LLMs' encoded and implicit values. Through our dynamic annotation processes, tailored prompt design, and experiments, we investigate how open-weight LLMs respond to value-sensitive issues, exploring their behavior across diverse linguistic and cultural contexts. Using two experimental set-ups based on log-probabilities and long-form responses, we show social and cultural variability across different LLMs. Specifically, experiments involving long-form responses demonstrate that refusals are triggered disparately across models, but consistently and more frequently in English or translated statements. Moreover, specific topics and sources lead to more pronounced differences across model answers, particularly on immigration, LGBTQI rights, and social welfare. As shown by our experiments, the CIVICS dataset aims to serve as a tool for future research, promoting reproducibility and transparency across broader linguistic settings, and furthering the development of AI technologies that respect and reflect global cultural diversities and value pluralism. The CIVICS dataset and tools will be made available upon publication under open licenses; an anonymized version is currently available at https://huggingface.co/CIVICS-dataset.

Read more

5/24/2024

VLBiasBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Bias in Large Vision-Language Model

VLBiasBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Bias in Large Vision-Language Model

Jie Zhang, Sibo Wang, Xiangkui Cao, Zheng Yuan, Shiguang Shan, Xilin Chen, Wen Gao

YC

0

Reddit

0

The emergence of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) marks significant strides towards achieving general artificial intelligence. However, these advancements are tempered by the outputs that often reflect biases, a concern not yet extensively investigated. Existing benchmarks are not sufficiently comprehensive in evaluating biases due to their limited data scale, single questioning format and narrow sources of bias. To address this problem, we introduce VLBiasBench, a benchmark aimed at evaluating biases in LVLMs comprehensively. In VLBiasBench, we construct a dataset encompassing nine distinct categories of social biases, including age, disability status, gender, nationality, physical appearance, race, religion, profession, social economic status and two intersectional bias categories (race x gender, and race x social economic status). To create a large-scale dataset, we use Stable Diffusion XL model to generate 46,848 high-quality images, which are combined with different questions to form 128,342 samples. These questions are categorized into open and close ended types, fully considering the sources of bias and comprehensively evaluating the biases of LVLM from multiple perspectives. We subsequently conduct extensive evaluations on 15 open-source models as well as one advanced closed-source model, providing some new insights into the biases revealing from these models. Our benchmark is available at https://github.com/Xiangkui-Cao/VLBiasBench.

Read more

6/21/2024