ValueBench: Towards Comprehensively Evaluating Value Orientations and Understanding of Large Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces ValueBench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating the value orientations and understanding of large language models (LLMs).
- The benchmark aims to assess how well LLMs can comprehend and reason about human values across diverse cultural contexts.
- It includes a large-scale, multi-cultural dataset of value-related scenarios and tasks, as well as evaluation metrics and methodologies.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers have developed a new tool called ValueBench to comprehensively test how well large language models (LLMs) understand and reason about human values. LLMs are AI systems that can generate human-like text, but it's important to understand how well they grasp the nuances of human values, which can vary across different cultures.
ValueBench includes a large dataset of scenarios and tasks related to human values, covering a diverse range of cultural contexts. This allows the researchers to evaluate LLMs on their ability to recognize, interpret, and reason about values like fairness, loyalty, sanctity, and others that are important to people around the world.
The paper also presents new evaluation metrics and methodologies to assess the value-related capabilities of LLMs. This provides a comprehensive framework for understanding the strengths and limitations of these AI systems when it comes to understanding human values.
By developing ValueBench, the researchers aim to advance the field of AI ethics and help ensure that as language models become more capable, they can reliably uphold and reason about the values that are important to people.
Technical Explanation
The ValueBench paper introduces a new benchmark for evaluating the value orientations and understanding of large language models (LLMs). The benchmark consists of a large-scale, multi-cultural dataset of value-related scenarios and tasks, as well as corresponding evaluation metrics and methodologies.
The dataset is inspired by the World Values Survey and covers a diverse range of value domains, including fairness, loyalty, sanctity, and others. The scenarios are designed to assess how well LLMs can recognize, interpret, and reason about these different value orientations in a user-centric and multilingual context.
The researchers propose several evaluation metrics, such as value alignment, value relevance, and value reasoning, to comprehensively assess the value-related capabilities of LLMs. These metrics are designed to go beyond simply measuring the models' ability to generate text that aligns with human values, and instead focus on deeper understanding and reasoning about those values.
Critical Analysis
The ValueBench benchmark represents a significant advancement in the field of AI ethics and value alignment. By providing a comprehensive dataset and evaluation framework, the researchers have created a valuable tool for assessing the value-related capabilities of large language models.
One potential limitation of the benchmark is the reliance on hypothetical scenarios and tasks, rather than real-world interactions. While this approach allows for more controlled and systematic evaluation, it may not fully capture the nuances of how LLMs would navigate value-laden situations in practice.
Additionally, the benchmark focuses primarily on individual-level values and may not adequately address the complex interplay between individual, social, and cultural values. Further research may be needed to explore how LLMs can navigate the often-competing value systems present in real-world contexts.
Overall, the ValueBench framework is a crucial step towards ensuring that as language models become more capable, they can reliably uphold and reason about the values that are important to people around the world.
Conclusion
The ValueBench paper presents a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating the value orientations and understanding of large language models. By providing a large-scale, multi-cultural dataset of value-related scenarios and tasks, as well as new evaluation metrics and methodologies, the researchers have created a valuable tool for advancing the field of AI ethics and value alignment.
The development of ValueBench represents an important step towards ensuring that as language models become more capable, they can reliably recognize, interpret, and reason about the diverse range of human values that are crucial to individuals and societies. This work has the potential to significantly impact the responsible development and deployment of large language models in the years to come.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
ValueBench: Towards Comprehensively Evaluating Value Orientations and Understanding of Large Language Models
Yuanyi Ren, Haoran Ye, Hanjun Fang, Xin Zhang, Guojie Song
Large Language Models (LLMs) are transforming diverse fields and gaining increasing influence as human proxies. This development underscores the urgent need for evaluating value orientations and understanding of LLMs to ensure their responsible integration into public-facing applications. This work introduces ValueBench, the first comprehensive psychometric benchmark for evaluating value orientations and value understanding in LLMs. ValueBench collects data from 44 established psychometric inventories, encompassing 453 multifaceted value dimensions. We propose an evaluation pipeline grounded in realistic human-AI interactions to probe value orientations, along with novel tasks for evaluating value understanding in an open-ended value space. With extensive experiments conducted on six representative LLMs, we unveil their shared and distinctive value orientations and exhibit their ability to approximate expert conclusions in value-related extraction and generation tasks. ValueBench is openly accessible at https://github.com/Value4AI/ValueBench.
Read more6/7/2024
0
Beyond Human Norms: Unveiling Unique Values of Large Language Models through Interdisciplinary Approaches
Pablo Biedma, Xiaoyuan Yi, Linus Huang, Maosong Sun, Xing Xie
Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized the AI field but also pose potential safety and ethical risks. Deciphering LLMs' embedded values becomes crucial for assessing and mitigating their risks. Despite extensive investigation into LLMs' values, previous studies heavily rely on human-oriented value systems in social sciences. Then, a natural question arises: Do LLMs possess unique values beyond those of humans? Delving into it, this work proposes a novel framework, ValueLex, to reconstruct LLMs' unique value system from scratch, leveraging psychological methodologies from human personality/value research. Based on Lexical Hypothesis, ValueLex introduces a generative approach to elicit diverse values from 30+ LLMs, synthesizing a taxonomy that culminates in a comprehensive value framework via factor analysis and semantic clustering. We identify three core value dimensions, Competence, Character, and Integrity, each with specific subdimensions, revealing that LLMs possess a structured, albeit non-human, value system. Based on this system, we further develop tailored projective tests to evaluate and analyze the value inclinations of LLMs across different model sizes, training methods, and data sources. Our framework fosters an interdisciplinary paradigm of understanding LLMs, paving the way for future AI alignment and regulation.
Read more5/13/2024
0
The Potential and Challenges of Evaluating Attitudes, Opinions, and Values in Large Language Models
Bolei Ma, Xinpeng Wang, Tiancheng Hu, Anna-Carolina Haensch, Michael A. Hedderich, Barbara Plank, Frauke Kreuter
Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have sparked wide interest in validating and comprehending the human-like cognitive-behavioral traits LLMs may have. These cognitive-behavioral traits include typically Attitudes, Opinions, Values (AOV). However, measuring AOV embedded within LLMs remains opaque, and different evaluation methods may yield different results. This has led to a lack of clarity on how different studies are related to each other and how they can be interpreted. This paper aims to bridge this gap by providing an overview of recent works on the evaluation of AOV in LLMs. Moreover, we survey related approaches in different stages of the evaluation pipeline in these works. By doing so, we address the potential and challenges with respect to understanding the model, human-AI alignment, and downstream application in social sciences. Finally, we provide practical insights into evaluation methods, model enhancement, and interdisciplinary collaboration, thereby contributing to the evolving landscape of evaluating AOV in LLMs.
Read more7/2/2024
💬
0
WorldValuesBench: A Large-Scale Benchmark Dataset for Multi-Cultural Value Awareness of Language Models
Wenlong Zhao, Debanjan Mondal, Niket Tandon, Danica Dillion, Kurt Gray, Yuling Gu
The awareness of multi-cultural human values is critical to the ability of language models (LMs) to generate safe and personalized responses. However, this awareness of LMs has been insufficiently studied, since the computer science community lacks access to the large-scale real-world data about multi-cultural values. In this paper, we present WorldValuesBench, a globally diverse, large-scale benchmark dataset for the multi-cultural value prediction task, which requires a model to generate a rating response to a value question based on demographic contexts. Our dataset is derived from an influential social science project, World Values Survey (WVS), that has collected answers to hundreds of value questions (e.g., social, economic, ethical) from 94,728 participants worldwide. We have constructed more than 20 million examples of the type (demographic attributes, value question) $rightarrow$ answer from the WVS responses. We perform a case study using our dataset and show that the task is challenging for strong open and closed-source models. On merely $11.1%$, $25.0%$, $72.2%$, and $75.0%$ of the questions, Alpaca-7B, Vicuna-7B-v1.5, Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1, and GPT-3.5 Turbo can respectively achieve $<0.2$ Wasserstein 1-distance from the human normalized answer distributions. WorldValuesBench opens up new research avenues in studying limitations and opportunities in multi-cultural value awareness of LMs.
Read more4/26/2024