Zero-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities of Large Language Models Iteratively without Gold Labels
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The research paper proposes a novel approach called "Zero-to-Strong Generalization" to elicit strong capabilities from large language models without the need for labeled data.
- It iteratively trains the model on a sequence of tasks, gradually increasing the difficulty and complexity of the tasks to achieve strong generalization.
- The method aims to bridge the gap between zero-shot and strong generalization, enabling large language models to develop robust and versatile capabilities.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers have developed a new way to train large language models, called "Zero-to-Strong Generalization." The key idea is to start with very simple tasks and gradually make them more complex over time, without ever needing labeled data.
For example, the model might start by learning to answer basic questions, then move on to more advanced tasks like summarizing articles or solving logic puzzles. By slowly increasing the difficulty, the model can develop strong, versatile capabilities without relying on labeled datasets, which can be expensive and time-consuming to create.
The researchers believe this approach can help bridge the gap between the limited "zero-shot" capabilities of language models and the more robust "strong generalization" that is desirable for many real-world applications. By training the model in this iterative way, they aim to unlock the full potential of large language models without the need for extensive labeled data.
Technical Explanation
The core idea of the "Zero-to-Strong Generalization" method is to iteratively train a large language model on a sequence of increasingly complex tasks, without requiring any labeled data. The researchers start with very simple "zero-shot" tasks and gradually increase the difficulty, aiming to elicit strong generalization capabilities from the model.
The training process consists of several stages. First, the model is pre-trained on a large corpus of unlabeled text data using self-supervised learning. Next, the researchers define a series of tasks, each slightly more challenging than the last. These tasks are designed to build upon the model's existing knowledge and gradually expand its capabilities.
For example, the model might start by answering basic questions, then move on to summarizing articles, and eventually solve complex logic puzzles. The key is that the model is never provided with labeled data; instead, it must learn to solve the tasks through a process of iterative self-training.
By gradually increasing the difficulty of the tasks, the researchers hypothesize that the model will develop strong, versatile capabilities without the need for extensive labeled data. This "Zero-to-Strong Generalization" approach aims to bridge the gap between the limited "zero-shot" abilities of language models and the more robust performance required for many real-world applications.
Critical Analysis
The "Zero-to-Strong Generalization" approach proposed in the paper is an innovative and promising method for training large language models. By gradually increasing the complexity of the tasks, the researchers aim to unlock the full potential of these models without relying on costly labeled datasets.
One potential limitation of the method is that the design of the task sequence is crucial to its success. The researchers must carefully curate a series of tasks that effectively build upon the model's existing knowledge and gradually expand its capabilities. If the task sequence is not well-designed, the model may struggle to transfer its learning from one task to the next, limiting the overall performance.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed evaluation of the method's performance compared to other approaches, such as fine-tuning on labeled data or few-shot learning. It would be helpful to see how the "Zero-to-Strong Generalization" method performs on a range of benchmark tasks and how it compares to other state-of-the-art techniques.
Despite these potential limitations, the "Zero-to-Strong Generalization" approach is a promising direction for the field of large language models. By reducing the reliance on labeled data, this method could significantly expand the accessibility and applicability of these powerful AI systems, with far-reaching implications for a wide range of applications.
Conclusion
The "Zero-to-Strong Generalization" method presented in this paper offers a novel approach to training large language models without the need for labeled data. By gradually increasing the complexity of the training tasks, the researchers aim to elicit strong, versatile capabilities from these models, bridging the gap between their limited "zero-shot" abilities and the more robust performance required for real-world applications.
While the method has some potential limitations in terms of task design and evaluation, it represents an exciting step forward in the field of large language models. By reducing the reliance on costly labeled datasets, this approach could significantly expand the accessibility and applicability of these powerful AI systems, with far-reaching implications for fields such as natural language processing, question answering, and beyond.
As the research in this area continues to evolve, it will be important to closely monitor the performance of the "Zero-to-Strong Generalization" method and explore ways to further refine and improve it. However, the core idea of gradually building up model capabilities through an iterative training process holds great promise for unlocking the full potential of large language models and driving the development of more capable and versatile AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
New!Zero-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities of Large Language Models Iteratively without Gold Labels
Chaoqun Liu, Qin Chao, Wenxuan Zhang, Xiaobao Wu, Boyang Li, Anh Tuan Luu, Lidong Bing
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance through supervised fine-tuning or in-context learning using gold labels. However, this paradigm is limited by the availability of gold labels, while in certain scenarios, LLMs may need to perform tasks that are too complex for humans to provide such labels. To tackle this challenge, this study explores whether solely utilizing unlabeled data can elicit strong model capabilities. We propose a new paradigm termed zero-to-strong generalization. We iteratively prompt LLMs to annotate unlabeled data and retain high-quality labels by filtering. Surprisingly, we obverse that this iterative process gradually unlocks LLMs' potential on downstream tasks. Our experiments on extensive classification and reasoning tasks confirm the effectiveness of our proposed framework. Our analysis indicates that this paradigm is effective for both in-context learning and fine-tuning, and for various model sizes.
Read more9/20/2024
🤯
0
A statistical framework for weak-to-strong generalization
Seamus Somerstep, Felipe Maia Polo, Moulinath Banerjee, Ya'acov Ritov, Mikhail Yurochkin, Yuekai Sun
Modern large language model (LLM) alignment techniques rely on human feedback, but it is unclear whether the techniques fundamentally limit the capabilities of aligned LLMs. In particular, it is unclear whether it is possible to align (stronger) LLMs with superhuman capabilities with (weaker) human feedback without degrading their capabilities. This is an instance of the weak-to-strong generalization problem: using weaker (less capable) feedback to train a stronger (more capable) model. We prove that weak-to-strong generalization is possible by eliciting latent knowledge from pre-trained LLMs. In particular, we cast the weak-to-strong generalization problem as a transfer learning problem in which we wish to transfer a latent concept from a weak model to a strong pre-trained model. We prove that a naive fine-tuning approach suffers from fundamental limitations, but an alternative refinement-based approach suggested by the problem structure provably overcomes the limitations of fine-tuning. Finally, we demonstrate the practical applicability of the refinement approach with three LLM alignment tasks.
Read more5/28/2024
💬
0
Leveraging Large Language Models for Knowledge-free Weak Supervision in Clinical Natural Language Processing
Enshuo Hsu, Kirk Roberts
The performance of deep learning-based natural language processing systems is based on large amounts of labeled training data which, in the clinical domain, are not easily available or affordable. Weak supervision and in-context learning offer partial solutions to this issue, particularly using large language models (LLMs), but their performance still trails traditional supervised methods with moderate amounts of gold-standard data. In particular, inferencing with LLMs is computationally heavy. We propose an approach leveraging fine-tuning LLMs and weak supervision with virtually no domain knowledge that still achieves consistently dominant performance. Using a prompt-based approach, the LLM is used to generate weakly-labeled data for training a downstream BERT model. The weakly supervised model is then further fine-tuned on small amounts of gold standard data. We evaluate this approach using Llama2 on three different n2c2 datasets. With no more than 10 gold standard notes, our final BERT models weakly supervised by fine-tuned Llama2-13B consistently outperformed out-of-the-box PubMedBERT by 4.7% to 47.9% in F1 scores. With only 50 gold standard notes, our models achieved close performance to fully fine-tuned systems.
Read more6/12/2024
0
Quantifying the Gain in Weak-to-Strong Generalization
Moses Charikar, Chirag Pabbaraju, Kirankumar Shiragur
Recent advances in large language models have shown capabilities that are extraordinary and near-superhuman. These models operate with such complexity that reliably evaluating and aligning them proves challenging for humans. This leads to the natural question: can guidance from weak models (like humans) adequately direct the capabilities of strong models? In a recent and somewhat surprising work, Burns et al. (2023) empirically demonstrated that when strong models (like GPT-4) are finetuned using labels generated by weak supervisors (like GPT-2), the strong models outperform their weaker counterparts -- a phenomenon they term weak-to-strong generalization. In this work, we present a theoretical framework for understanding weak-to-strong generalization. Specifically, we show that the improvement in performance achieved by strong models over their weaker counterparts is quantified by the misfit error incurred by the strong model on labels generated by the weaker model. Our theory reveals several curious algorithmic insights. For instance, we can predict the amount by which the strong model will improve over the weak model, and also choose among different weak models to train the strong model, based on its misfit error. We validate our theoretical findings through various empirical assessments.
Read more5/27/2024