Achieving >97% on GSM8K: Deeply Understanding the Problems Makes LLMs Perfect Reasoners
2404.14963
0
0
🤔
Abstract
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has enhanced the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) across various reasoning tasks. However, CoT still falls short in dealing with complex math word problems, as it usually suffers from three pitfalls: semantic misunderstanding errors, calculation errors and step-missing errors. Prior studies involve addressing the calculation errors and step-missing errors, but neglect the semantic misunderstanding errors, which is the major factor limiting the LLMs' performance. To this end, we propose a simple-yet-effective method, namely Deeply Understanding the Problems (DUP), to improve the LLMs' math problem-solving ability by addressing semantic misunderstanding errors. The core of our method is to encourage the LLMs to deeply understand the problems and extract the key problem-solving information used for better reasoning. Extensive experiments on 10 diverse reasoning benchmarks show that our DUP method consistently outperforms the other counterparts by a large margin. More encouragingly, DUP achieves a new SOTA result on the GSM8K benchmark, with an accuracy of 97.1% under zero-shot setting.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The provided research paper explores a novel prompt strategy called "Deeply Understanding the Problems" (DUP) to enhance the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) on complex reasoning tasks.
- The paper argues that while the Chain of Thought (CoT) prompting strategy has improved LLM performance, it still struggles with certain types of reasoning errors, such as understanding errors, calculation errors, and process errors.
- The proposed DUP prompting approach aims to improve LLMs' comprehensive understanding of problems by going through three key stages: extracting the core question, finding problem-solving information, and generating and extracting answers.
- Experimental results suggest that the DUP prompting strategy significantly outperforms the Zero-Shot CoT approach across various reasoning datasets, achieving state-of-the-art performance on the SVAMP and GSM8K datasets.
Plain English Explanation
The research paper discusses a new way to improve the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs), which are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. While current techniques, such as Chain of Thought prompting, have helped LLMs perform better on complex reasoning tasks, they still struggle with certain types of errors, like misunderstanding the problem, making mistakes in calculations, or missing important steps.
The researchers propose a new strategy called "Deeply Understanding the Problems" (DUP) prompting, which is inspired by how humans solve complex problems. The DUP approach has three main steps:
- Extract the core question: The LLM first identifies the key question or problem that needs to be solved.
- Find problem-solving information: The LLM then gathers relevant information to help solve the problem, such as background knowledge or step-by-step strategies.
- Generate and extract answers: Finally, the LLM uses the information gathered in the previous steps to generate and extract the final answer.
The researchers tested the DUP prompting strategy on a variety of datasets that measure reasoning abilities, and found that it significantly outperformed the previous Zero-Shot Chain of Thought approach. Notably, DUP achieved the best-ever results on two specific reasoning tasks, SVAMP and GSM8K.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel prompt strategy called "Deeply Understanding the Problems" (DUP) to address the shortcomings of the Chain of Thought (CoT) prompting approach when dealing with complex reasoning tasks. The authors argue that while CoT has enhanced the performance of LLMs, it still struggles with certain types of errors, such as understanding errors, calculation errors, and process errors (e.g., missing-step and hallucinations).
The key idea behind DUP prompting is to enhance the comprehensive understanding of problems by LLMs, inspired by how humans solve complex reasoning problems. The DUP prompting strategy consists of three stages:
- Extract the core question: The LLM first extracts the core question from the given problem statement.
- Find problem-solving information: The LLM then finds relevant problem-solving information, such as background knowledge or step-by-step strategies, based on the core question.
- Generate and extract answers: Finally, the LLM uses the information gathered in the previous steps to generate and extract the final answer.
The researchers evaluate the performance of DUP prompting on ten diverse reasoning datasets and compare it to the Zero-Shot CoT approach. The experimental results suggest that DUP prompting significantly outperforms Zero-Shot CoT across all datasets. Notably, DUP achieves state-of-the-art performance on the SVAMP (90.4% to 94.2%) and GSM8K (94.6% to 97.1%) datasets.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a compelling approach to enhancing the reasoning capabilities of LLMs by addressing some of the key limitations of the existing CoT prompting strategy. The authors' in-depth analysis of various error types and the subsequent design of the DUP prompting strategy to improve comprehensive problem understanding is a well-reasoned and innovative contribution.
However, the paper does not provide a detailed discussion of the potential limitations or caveats of the DUP approach. For example, it would be valuable to understand how the DUP strategy performs on even more complex or open-ended reasoning tasks, or how it might be affected by variations in the problem statements or the language used.
Additionally, the paper could have explored the potential challenges or biases that might arise from the three-stage DUP prompting process, as well as any potential trade-offs or computational costs associated with the approach. Curious LLM and Self-Polish are two other relevant papers that explore similar challenges and approaches to enhancing LLM reasoning.
Overall, the paper presents a promising step forward in improving the reasoning abilities of LLMs, but further research and analysis would be valuable to fully understand the strengths, limitations, and potential implications of the DUP prompting strategy.
Conclusion
The research paper introduces a novel "Deeply Understanding the Problems" (DUP) prompting strategy to enhance the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) on complex reasoning tasks. The DUP approach aims to improve LLMs' comprehensive understanding of problems by extracting the core question, finding relevant problem-solving information, and then generating and extracting answers.
Experimental results demonstrate that the DUP prompting strategy significantly outperforms the previous Zero-Shot Chain of Thought approach across various reasoning datasets, achieving state-of-the-art performance on the SVAMP and GSM8K benchmarks.
This research represents an important step forward in enhancing the reasoning capabilities of LLMs, which have become increasingly crucial for a wide range of applications, from question-answering to program generation. By developing more comprehensive and effective prompting strategies, the field can continue to push the boundaries of what LLMs can achieve in complex reasoning and problem-solving tasks.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Large Language Models are Contrastive Reasoners
Liang Yao
0
0
Prompting methods play a crucial role in enhancing the capabilities of pre-trained large language models (LLMs). We explore how contrastive prompting (CP) significantly improves the ability of large language models to perform complex reasoning. We demonstrate that LLMs are decent contrastive reasoners by simply adding Let's give a correct and a wrong answer. before LLMs provide answers. Experiments on various large language models show that zero-shot contrastive prompting improves performance on a range of arithmetic, commonsense, and symbolic reasoning tasks without any hand-crafted few-shot examples, such as increasing the accuracy on GSM8K from 35.9% to 88.8% and AQUA-RAT from 41.3% to 62.2% with the state-of-the-art GPT-4 model. Our method not only surpasses zero-shot CoT and few-shot CoT in most arithmetic and commonsense reasoning tasks but also can seamlessly integrate with existing prompting methods, resulting in improved or comparable results when compared to state-of-the-art methods. Our code is available at https://github.com/yao8839836/cp
5/24/2024
📉
Competition-Level Problems are Effective LLM Evaluators
Yiming Huang, Zhenghao Lin, Xiao Liu, Yeyun Gong, Shuai Lu, Fangyu Lei, Yaobo Liang, Yelong Shen, Chen Lin, Nan Duan, Weizhu Chen
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive reasoning capabilities, yet there is ongoing debate about these abilities and the potential data contamination problem recently. This paper aims to evaluate the reasoning capacities of LLMs, specifically in solving recent competition-level programming problems in Codeforces, which are expert-crafted and unique, requiring deep understanding and robust reasoning skills. We first provide a comprehensive evaluation of GPT-4's peiceived zero-shot performance on this task, considering various aspects such as problems' release time, difficulties, and types of errors encountered. Surprisingly, the peiceived performance of GPT-4 has experienced a cliff like decline in problems after September 2021 consistently across all the difficulties and types of problems, which shows the potential data contamination, as well as the challenges for any existing LLM to solve unseen complex reasoning problems. We further explore various approaches such as fine-tuning, Chain-of-Thought prompting and problem description simplification, unfortunately none of them is able to consistently mitigate the challenges. Through our work, we emphasis the importance of this excellent data source for assessing the genuine reasoning capabilities of LLMs, and foster the development of LLMs with stronger reasoning abilities and better generalization in the future.
6/5/2024
CuriousLLM: Elevating Multi-Document QA with Reasoning-Infused Knowledge Graph Prompting
Zukang Yang, Zixuan Zhu
0
0
In the field of Question Answering (QA), unifying large language models (LLMs) with external databases has shown great success. However, these methods often fall short in providing the advanced reasoning needed for complex QA tasks. To address these issues, we improve over a novel approach called Knowledge Graph Prompting (KGP), which combines knowledge graphs with a LLM-based agent to improve reasoning and search accuracy. Nevertheless, the original KGP framework necessitates costly fine-tuning with large datasets yet still suffers from LLM hallucination. Therefore, we propose a reasoning-infused LLM agent to enhance this framework. This agent mimics human curiosity to ask follow-up questions to more efficiently navigate the search. This simple modification significantly boosts the LLM performance in QA tasks without the high costs and latency associated with the initial KGP framework. Our ultimate goal is to further develop this approach, leading to more accurate, faster, and cost-effective solutions in the QA domain.
4/16/2024
🌀
An Enhanced Prompt-Based LLM Reasoning Scheme via Knowledge Graph-Integrated Collaboration
Yihao Li, Ru Zhang, Jianyi Liu
0
0
While Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate exceptional performance in a multitude of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, they encounter challenges in practical applications, including issues with hallucinations, inadequate knowledge updating, and limited transparency in the reasoning process. To overcome these limitations, this study innovatively proposes a collaborative training-free reasoning scheme involving tight cooperation between Knowledge Graph (KG) and LLMs. This scheme first involves using LLMs to iteratively explore KG, selectively retrieving a task-relevant knowledge subgraph to support reasoning. The LLMs are then guided to further combine inherent implicit knowledge to reason on the subgraph while explicitly elucidating the reasoning process. Through such a cooperative approach, our scheme achieves more reliable knowledge-based reasoning and facilitates the tracing of the reasoning results. Experimental results show that our scheme significantly progressed across multiple datasets, notably achieving over a 10% improvement on the QALD10 dataset compared to the best baseline and the fine-tuned state-of-the-art (SOTA) work. Building on this success, this study hopes to offer a valuable reference for future research in the fusion of KG and LLMs, thereby enhancing LLMs' proficiency in solving complex issues.
6/13/2024