Acting upon Imagination: when to trust imagined trajectories in model based reinforcement learning
2105.05716
0
0
📈
Abstract
Model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) aims to learn model(s) of the environment dynamics that can predict the outcome of its actions. Forward application of the model yields so called imagined trajectories (sequences of action, predicted state-reward) used to optimize the set of candidate actions that maximize expected reward. The outcome, an ideal imagined trajectory or plan, is imperfect and typically MBRL relies on model predictive control (MPC) to overcome this by continuously re-planning from scratch, incurring thus major computational cost and increasing complexity in tasks with longer receding horizon. We propose uncertainty estimation methods for online evaluation of imagined trajectories to assess whether further planned actions can be trusted to deliver acceptable reward. These methods include comparing the error after performing the last action with the standard expected error and using model uncertainty to assess the deviation from expected outcomes. Additionally, we introduce methods that exploit the forward propagation of the dynamics model to evaluate if the remainder of the plan aligns with expected results and assess the remainder of the plan in terms of the expected reward. Our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed uncertainty estimation methods by applying them to avoid unnecessary trajectory replanning in a shooting MBRL setting. Results highlight significant reduction on computational costs without sacrificing performance.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) aims to learn models of the environment dynamics to predict the outcomes of actions.
- MBRL uses these predicted outcomes, called "imagined trajectories," to optimize actions that maximize expected reward.
- However, these imagined trajectories are imperfect, so MBRL often relies on model predictive control (MPC) to continuously re-plan, which is computationally costly.
- This paper proposes methods to assess the uncertainty of imagined trajectories to avoid unnecessary re-planning.
Plain English Explanation
In reinforcement learning, an agent tries to learn the best actions to take in an environment in order to maximize some reward. Model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) is a approach where the agent first learns a model of how the environment works, and then uses that model to imagine or "dream up" sequences of actions and their predicted outcomes, called "imagined trajectories." The agent can then use these imagined trajectories to figure out the best actions to take.
However, these imagined trajectories are not perfect - the model's predictions may not always match reality. To overcome this, MBRL often relies on model predictive control (MPC), which constantly re-plans the actions from scratch. This re-planning is computationally expensive, especially for tasks with a long "horizon" or sequence of future steps.
This paper proposes new methods to estimate the uncertainty or reliability of the imagined trajectories. By assessing how uncertain the model is about the predicted outcomes, the agent can decide whether to trust the current plan or if it needs to re-plan. This allows the agent to avoid unnecessary re-planning, reducing the computational cost without sacrificing performance.
The key ideas are to:
- Compare the error after taking an action to the expected error, to see if the model is performing as expected.
- Use the model's own uncertainty estimates to assess how much the actual outcomes might deviate from the predicted ones.
- Evaluate whether the rest of the imagined trajectory aligns with the expected results, and whether the projected reward for the remainder of the plan is acceptable.
By incorporating these uncertainty estimation methods, the agent can make smarter decisions about when to re-plan, leading to more efficient model-based reinforcement learning and active exploration.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes several methods for online evaluation of the uncertainty in imagined trajectories generated by a model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) agent. The goal is to assess whether the agent can trust the current plan or if it should re-plan from scratch, which is computationally expensive.
The first method compares the error after taking an action to the expected error based on the model's predictions. If the actual error is significantly higher than expected, it suggests the model is not accurately capturing the environment dynamics, and re-planning may be necessary.
The second method uses the model's own uncertainty estimates to assess the likelihood that the actual outcomes will deviate substantially from the predicted ones. If the model is highly uncertain about the predicted states and rewards, the agent should be cautious about trusting the current plan.
The third method evaluates whether the remainder of the imagined trajectory aligns with expected results, and whether the projected cumulative reward for the rest of the plan is still acceptable. Significant divergence from expectations would indicate the plan should be updated.
The paper evaluates these uncertainty estimation techniques in a "shooting" MBRL setting, where the agent generates multiple imagined trajectories and selects the best one. The results show that incorporating the proposed methods allows the agent to avoid unnecessary trajectory re-planning, leading to significant reductions in computational cost without sacrificing performance.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thoughtful approach to addressing a key challenge in model-based reinforcement learning - the imperfect nature of the learned environment models. By developing methods to dynamically assess the reliability of the imagined trajectories, the agents can make more informed decisions about when to trust the current plan versus triggering a computationally-expensive re-planning process.
One limitation noted by the authors is that the proposed techniques may be most effective for tasks with a relatively short planning horizon. For environments with very long-term dependencies, the model uncertainty may compound to the point where the agent can never confidently execute a full plan. Further research may be needed to extend these methods to handle longer-horizon tasks.
Additionally, the paper focuses on a "shooting" MBRL setting, where the agent generates multiple imagined trajectories and selects the best one. It's not clear how well these uncertainty estimation techniques would generalize to other MBRL approaches, such as trajectory optimization or actor-critic models. Evaluating the methods in a wider range of MBRL contexts would strengthen the claims about their broader applicability.
Overall, this paper presents a valuable contribution to the MBRL literature by introducing novel techniques to address a fundamental challenge. The experimental results are promising, and further research building on these ideas could lead to more sample-efficient and computationally-feasible model-based reinforcement learning agents.
Conclusion
This paper tackles a key issue in model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) - the imperfect nature of the learned environment models and the resulting need for computationally expensive re-planning. By introducing methods to dynamically assess the uncertainty in imagined trajectories, the proposed approach allows MBRL agents to make more informed decisions about when to trust the current plan versus triggering a re-planning process.
The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of these uncertainty estimation techniques in reducing computational costs without sacrificing performance. While the methods may be most suitable for tasks with shorter planning horizons, this work represents an important step forward in making MBRL approaches more practical and efficient. Further research building on these ideas could lead to significant advancements in model-based reinforcement learning and its applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Trust the Model Where It Trusts Itself -- Model-Based Actor-Critic with Uncertainty-Aware Rollout Adaption
Bernd Frauenknecht, Artur Eisele, Devdutt Subhasish, Friedrich Solowjow, Sebastian Trimpe
0
0
Dyna-style model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) combines model-free agents with predictive transition models through model-based rollouts. This combination raises a critical question: 'When to trust your model?'; i.e., which rollout length results in the model providing useful data? Janner et al. (2019) address this question by gradually increasing rollout lengths throughout the training. While theoretically tempting, uniform model accuracy is a fallacy that collapses at the latest when extrapolating. Instead, we propose asking the question 'Where to trust your model?'. Using inherent model uncertainty to consider local accuracy, we obtain the Model-Based Actor-Critic with Uncertainty-Aware Rollout Adaption (MACURA) algorithm. We propose an easy-to-tune rollout mechanism and demonstrate substantial improvements in data efficiency and performance compared to state-of-the-art deep MBRL methods on the MuJoCo benchmark.
6/24/2024
📈
Model predictive control-based value estimation for efficient reinforcement learning
Qizhen Wu, Kexin Liu, Lei Chen
0
0
Reinforcement learning suffers from limitations in real practices primarily due to the number of required interactions with virtual environments. It results in a challenging problem because we are implausible to obtain a local optimal strategy with only a few attempts for many learning methods. Hereby, we design an improved reinforcement learning method based on model predictive control that models the environment through a data-driven approach. Based on the learned environment model, it performs multi-step prediction to estimate the value function and optimize the policy. The method demonstrates higher learning efficiency, faster convergent speed of strategies tending to the local optimal value, and less sample capacity space required by experience replay buffers. Experimental results, both in classic databases and in a dynamic obstacle avoidance scenario for an unmanned aerial vehicle, validate the proposed approaches.
4/12/2024
Safe Deep Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with Lyapunov Functions
Harry Zhang
0
0
Model-based Reinforcement Learning (MBRL) has shown many desirable properties for intelligent control tasks. However, satisfying safety and stability constraints during training and rollout remains an open question. We propose a new Model-based RL framework to enable efficient policy learning with unknown dynamics based on learning model predictive control (LMPC) framework with mathematically provable guarantees of stability. We introduce and explore a novel method for adding safety constraints for model-based RL during training and policy learning. The new stability-augmented framework consists of a neural-network-based learner that learns to construct a Lyapunov function, and a model-based RL agent to consistently complete the tasks while satisfying user-specified constraints given only sub-optimal demonstrations and sparse-cost feedback. We demonstrate the capability of the proposed framework through simulated experiments.
5/28/2024
🏅
A Unified View on Solving Objective Mismatch in Model-Based Reinforcement Learning
Ran Wei, Nathan Lambert, Anthony McDonald, Alfredo Garcia, Roberto Calandra
0
0
Model-based Reinforcement Learning (MBRL) aims to make agents more sample-efficient, adaptive, and explainable by learning an explicit model of the environment. While the capabilities of MBRL agents have significantly improved in recent years, how to best learn the model is still an unresolved question. The majority of MBRL algorithms aim at training the model to make accurate predictions about the environment and subsequently using the model to determine the most rewarding actions. However, recent research has shown that model predictive accuracy is often not correlated with action quality, tracing the root cause to the objective mismatch between accurate dynamics model learning and policy optimization of rewards. A number of interrelated solution categories to the objective mismatch problem have emerged as MBRL continues to mature as a research area. In this work, we provide an in-depth survey of these solution categories and propose a taxonomy to foster future research.
4/9/2024