Active Preference Learning for Ordering Items In- and Out-of-sample

Overview

• This paper explores active learning algorithms for ordering items based on noisy pairwise comparisons, which is useful when item-specific labels are difficult to assign.
• Many existing algorithms treat items as unrelated, ignoring their shared contextual attributes and limiting sample efficiency and generalization.
• The authors propose two new algorithms designed to actively sample comparisons in a way that minimizes the expected ordering error, considering both aleatoric (inherent) and epistemic (model) uncertainty.
• The algorithms are evaluated on realistic image ordering tasks, including one with human-provided comparisons, and demonstrate superior sample efficiency compared to non-contextual and baseline approaches.

Plain English Explanation

Ordering items is often useful, but can be tricky when it's hard to directly label the items themselves. For example, if you need to rank a set of products based on how "good" they are, it may be difficult for people to assign a numerical score to each one. Instead, it might be easier for them to compare pairs of products and say which one is better.

The authors recognized that many existing algorithms for learning these rankings from pairwise comparisons don't take advantage of the fact that the items being ranked often have associated attributes (like product features). By ignoring these attributes, the algorithms miss out on opportunities to learn more efficiently and apply what they've learned to new items.

To address this, the authors developed two new algorithms that actively select which pairwise comparisons to request in order to minimize the expected error in the final ranking. Importantly, these algorithms consider both the inherent uncertainty in the comparisons (e.g., due to human disagreement) and the uncertainty in the model's understanding of how the item attributes relate to the rankings.

The authors tested their algorithms on real-world tasks like ranking images, including one where the comparisons came from human annotators. They found that their algorithms were more sample-efficient than previous approaches, meaning they could learn accurate rankings using fewer pairwise comparisons.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a framework for active learning of item orderings from noisy pairwise comparisons, taking into account contextual item attributes. The authors model the pairwise preferences using a logistic utility function, where the utility of an item depends on its contextual features.

To actively select the most informative pairwise comparisons, the authors derive an upper bound on the expected ordering error in terms of the aleatoric (inherent) uncertainty in the comparisons and the epistemic (model) uncertainty. They then propose two algorithms, Active Ranking with Uncertainty Weighted Pairs (ARUWP) and Active Ranking with Feature-Weighted Uncertainty (ARFWU), that greedily select pairs to minimize this error bound.

ARUWP selects pairs with high overall uncertainty, while ARFWU additionally weighs the uncertainty by the relevance of the item features to the ranking. The authors provide theoretical analysis of these algorithms, showing they can achieve better sample efficiency than non-contextual ranking approaches and [active preference learning baselines](https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/optimal-design-human-feedback, https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/improved-active-learning-via-dependent-leverage-score, https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/classification-tree-based-active-learning-wrapper-approach).

The algorithms are evaluated on two realistic image ordering tasks, one with comparisons provided by human annotators. The results demonstrate the superior sample efficiency of the proposed methods compared to the baselines, particularly in the human-annotated task.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and well-motivated approach to active learning for item ordering from pairwise comparisons. The key strengths are the consideration of contextual item attributes, the principled optimization of an error bound, and the demonstrated improvements over existing methods.

One potential limitation is the assumption of a logistic utility function, which may not perfectly capture real-world preference structures. The authors acknowledge this and suggest extensions to more flexible models as future work.

Additionally, the paper focuses on a single-task setting, where the goal is to learn a ranking for a fixed set of items. It would be interesting to explore how these algorithms could be adapted to handle cold-start scenarios with new items, or to learn a general ranking function that can be applied across different item sets.

Finally, while the human-annotated experiment provides valuable real-world insights, the sample size is relatively small. Conducting larger-scale user studies would help further validate the practical benefits of the proposed approach.

Overall, this work makes an important contribution to the active learning literature, with promising implications for a variety of ranking and preference learning applications.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a new framework for actively learning item orderings from noisy pairwise comparisons, taking advantage of contextual item attributes to improve sample efficiency and generalization. The proposed algorithms, ARUWP and ARFWU, greedily select the most informative comparisons to minimize the expected ordering error, considering both inherent and model-based uncertainty.

Experiments on realistic image ordering tasks, including one with human-provided comparisons, demonstrate the superior performance of these algorithms compared to non-contextual and baseline active learning approaches. This work represents an important step forward in preference learning, with potential applications in recommendation systems, user interface design, and other domains where accurate rankings are valuable but direct item labels are hard to obtain.