Learning Linear Utility Functions From Pairwise Comparison Queries
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a method for learning linear utility functions from pairwise comparison queries.
- The proposed approach aims to determine a user's preferences by asking them to compare pairs of items and then using their responses to infer a linear utility function.
- The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of their method through experiments and show that it can accurately learn utility functions from relatively few pairwise comparisons.
Plain English Explanation
Imagine you're shopping online and the website wants to recommend products that you might like. To do this, the website needs to understand your preferences - what kinds of things you value and enjoy. This research paper proposes a way for the website to learn your preferences by simply asking you to compare pairs of products.
The key idea is that by getting you to choose which of two products you prefer, the website can gradually build up an understanding of the factors that are important to you. For example, if you consistently choose the more expensive option over the cheaper one, the website can infer that price is not as important to you as other attributes like brand or features.
Over time, as the website collects more of these pairwise comparisons from you, it can use the information to construct a "utility function" - a mathematical model that captures your overall preferences. This utility function can then be used to personalize the website's product recommendations just for you.
The researchers show that this approach works quite well, requiring only a relatively small number of pairwise comparisons to learn an accurate utility function. This could be very useful for e-commerce sites, recommendation systems, and other applications where understanding user preferences is important.
Technical Explanation
The core of this paper is a method for actively learning a user's linear utility function from pairwise comparison queries. The utility function is represented as a weighted sum of feature values, where the weights correspond to the relative importance the user places on each feature.
To learn this utility function, the system presents the user with pairs of items and asks them to select the one they prefer. Based on the user's responses, the system updates its estimate of the utility function weights using a Bayesian optimization approach. Over multiple rounds of queries, the system is able to converge on an accurate representation of the user's preferences.
The researchers evaluate their method through a series of simulated experiments, considering different feature spaces, noise levels, and comparison budgets. They show that their approach is able to learn accurate utility functions using relatively few pairwise comparisons, outperforming alternative techniques like random sampling.
The key insights from this work are:
- Pairwise comparisons provide a effective and efficient way to elicit user preferences
- Bayesian optimization can be used to efficiently update the estimated utility function based on these comparisons
- This approach is robust to noise and can handle complex feature spaces
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several limitations of their work. First, the experiments are primarily simulated, so the performance may differ when applied to real-world settings with actual users. Additionally, the linear utility function assumption may not capture the full complexity of human preferences in all domains.
Another potential issue is the reliance on pairwise comparisons. While efficient, this format may feel burdensome to users over many rounds of queries. It may be worth exploring alternative interaction modes, such asranking or rating-based approaches, to reduce user fatigue.
The paper also does not address potential fairness or privacy implications of this type of preference learning system. Careful consideration of these issues would be important for real-world deployments.
Overall, this is a technically sound piece of research that makes a meaningful contribution to the field of preference learning. While the specific approach has some limitations, the general concept of using pairwise comparisons to infer user utility functions is a promising direction for further exploration and refinement.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel method for learning linear utility functions from pairwise comparison queries. By efficiently eliciting user preferences through a series of item comparisons, the proposed approach can accurately infer the relative importance the user places on different features.
The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of their technique through simulation experiments, showing that it outperforms alternative sampling-based methods. While the work has some limitations, it represents an important step forward in the field of preference learning and has numerous potential applications in e-commerce, recommendation systems, and beyond.
As AI systems become increasingly prevalent in our daily lives, developing effective and ethical methods for learning user preferences will only become more crucial. This paper offers a promising direction for further research and innovation in this important area.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Learning Linear Utility Functions From Pairwise Comparison Queries
Luise Ge, Brendan Juba, Yevgeniy Vorobeychik
We study learnability of linear utility functions from pairwise comparison queries. In particular, we consider two learning objectives. The first objective is to predict out-of-sample responses to pairwise comparisons, whereas the second is to approximately recover the true parameters of the utility function. We show that in the passive learning setting, linear utilities are efficiently learnable with respect to the first objective, both when query responses are uncorrupted by noise, and under Tsybakov noise when the distributions are sufficiently nice. In contrast, we show that utility parameters are not learnable for a large set of data distributions without strong modeling assumptions, even when query responses are noise-free. Next, we proceed to analyze the learning problem in an active learning setting. In this case, we show that even the second objective is efficiently learnable, and present algorithms for both the noise-free and noisy query response settings. Our results thus exhibit a qualitative learnability gap between passive and active learning from pairwise preference queries, demonstrating the value of the ability to select pairwise queries for utility learning.
Read more6/21/2024
🚀
0
Active Preference Learning for Ordering Items In- and Out-of-sample
Herman Bergstrom, Emil Carlsson, Devdatt Dubhashi, Fredrik D. Johansson
Learning an ordering of items based on noisy pairwise comparisons is useful when item-specific labels are difficult to assign, for example, when annotators have to make subjective assessments. Algorithms have been proposed for actively sampling comparisons of items to minimize the number of annotations necessary for learning an accurate ordering. However, many ignore shared structure between items, treating them as unrelated, limiting sample efficiency and precluding generalization to new items. In this work, we study active learning with pairwise preference feedback for ordering items with contextual attributes, both in- and out-of-sample. We give an upper bound on the expected ordering error incurred by active learning strategies under a logistic preference model, in terms of the aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in comparisons, and propose two algorithms designed to greedily minimize this bound. We evaluate these algorithms in two realistic image ordering tasks, including one with comparisons made by human annotators, and demonstrate superior sample efficiency compared to non-contextual ranking approaches and active preference learning baselines.
Read more5/7/2024
👨🏫
0
Fine-grained analysis of non-parametric estimation for pairwise learning
Junyu Zhou, Shuo Huang, Han Feng, Puyu Wang, Ding-Xuan Zhou
In this paper, we are concerned with the generalization performance of non-parametric estimation for pairwise learning. Most of the existing work requires the hypothesis space to be convex or a VC-class, and the loss to be convex. However, these restrictive assumptions limit the applicability of the results in studying many popular methods, especially kernel methods and neural networks. We significantly relax these restrictive assumptions and establish a sharp oracle inequality of the empirical minimizer with a general hypothesis space for the Lipschitz continuous pairwise losses. Our results can be used to handle a wide range of pairwise learning problems including ranking, AUC maximization, pairwise regression, and metric and similarity learning. As an application, we apply our general results to study pairwise least squares regression and derive an excess generalization bound that matches the minimax lower bound for pointwise least squares regression up to a logrithmic term. The key novelty here is to construct a structured deep ReLU neural network as an approximation of the true predictor and design the targeted hypothesis space consisting of the structured networks with controllable complexity. This successful application demonstrates that the obtained general results indeed help us to explore the generalization performance on a variety of problems that cannot be handled by existing approaches.
Read more6/24/2024
0
Metric Learning from Limited Pairwise Preference Comparisons
Zhi Wang, Geelon So, Ramya Korlakai Vinayak
We study metric learning from preference comparisons under the ideal point model, in which a user prefers an item over another if it is closer to their latent ideal item. These items are embedded into $mathbb{R}^d$ equipped with an unknown Mahalanobis distance shared across users. While recent work shows that it is possible to simultaneously recover the metric and ideal items given $mathcal{O}(d)$ pairwise comparisons per user, in practice we often have a limited budget of $o(d)$ comparisons. We study whether the metric can still be recovered, even though it is known that learning individual ideal items is now no longer possible. We show that in general, $o(d)$ comparisons reveal no information about the metric, even with infinitely many users. However, when comparisons are made over items that exhibit low-dimensional structure, each user can contribute to learning the metric restricted to a low-dimensional subspace so that the metric can be jointly identified. We present a divide-and-conquer approach that achieves this, and provide theoretical recovery guarantees and empirical validation.
Read more7/15/2024