Additive Margin in Contrastive Self-Supervised Frameworks to Learn Discriminative Speaker Representations

Read original: arXiv:2404.14913 - Published 4/24/2024 by Theo Lepage, Reda Dehak
Total Score

0

👁️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores ways to improve the performance of self-supervised learning (SSL) techniques for speaker verification (SV) tasks.
  • The authors focus on revisiting the NT-Xent contrastive loss and propose the NT-Xent-AM loss, which incorporates an additive margin (AM) to further separate positive and negative pairs.
  • They also investigate the effectiveness of a symmetric contrastive loss, which provides more supervision for the SSL task.
  • The proposed techniques are implemented in the SimCLR SSL framework and demonstrate improved performance on the VoxCeleb1-O dataset.

Plain English Explanation

Self-supervised learning (SSL) frameworks have become the standard for learning robust class representations by taking advantage of large unlabeled datasets. In the context of speaker verification (SV), most SSL systems rely on contrastive-based loss functions.

The authors of this paper explore different ways to enhance the performance of these contrastive-based techniques. They focus on revisiting the NT-Xent contrastive loss, which is commonly used in SSL methods like SimCLR and MoCo.

The key contribution is the definition of the NT-Xent-AM loss, which incorporates an additive margin (AM) to further separate positive (same-speaker) and negative (different-speaker) pairs. Even in the presence of class collisions (where speakers may sound similar), the authors show that the AM helps improve the compactness of same-speaker embeddings and reduces the number of false positives and false negatives in the SV task.

Additionally, the researchers explore the use of a symmetric contrastive loss, which provides more supervision for the SSL task compared to the standard contrastive loss. Implementing these two modifications to the SimCLR framework leads to improved performance, resulting in a 7.85% equal error rate (EER) on the VoxCeleb1-O dataset, outperforming other equivalent methods.

Technical Explanation

The paper starts by acknowledging the success of self-supervised learning (SSL) frameworks in learning robust class representations from large unlabeled datasets. In the context of speaker verification (SV), most SSL systems rely on contrastive-based loss functions, such as the NT-Xent loss used in SimCLR and MoCo.

The authors' main contribution is the definition of the NT-Xent-AM loss, which incorporates an additive margin (AM) to further separate positive (same-speaker) and negative (different-speaker) pairs in the contrastive learning process. They demonstrate that the AM enhances the compactness of same-speaker embeddings and reduces the number of false negatives and false positives in the SV task, even in the presence of class collisions (where speakers may sound similar).

Additionally, the researchers explore the use of a symmetric contrastive loss, which provides more supervision for the SSL task compared to the standard contrastive loss. They implement these two modifications (NT-Xent-AM and symmetric contrastive loss) in the SimCLR framework and evaluate the performance on the VoxCeleb1-O dataset.

The results show that the proposed techniques outperform other equivalent methods, achieving a 7.85% equal error rate (EER) on the VoxCeleb1-O dataset.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a thoughtful approach to improving the performance of contrastive-based SSL techniques for speaker verification tasks. The incorporation of the additive margin (AM) in the NT-Xent loss and the exploration of the symmetric contrastive loss are promising developments that address the challenges of class collisions and provide more supervision for the SSL task.

However, the paper does not delve into the potential limitations or caveats of the proposed methods. For example, it would be valuable to understand how the AM and symmetric loss impact the training dynamics and convergence, and whether there are any trade-offs or edge cases where the performance may degrade.

Additionally, the paper could have provided more context on the broader landscape of contrastive learning approaches for speaker verification and how the current work fits into or advances the state of the art.

Overall, the paper presents a solid technical contribution, but could benefit from a more thorough discussion of the limitations and potential avenues for further research.

Conclusion

This paper explores ways to improve the performance of self-supervised learning (SSL) techniques for speaker verification (SV) tasks. The authors propose the NT-Xent-AM loss, which incorporates an additive margin to further separate positive and negative pairs in the contrastive learning process. They also investigate the use of a symmetric contrastive loss to provide more supervision for the SSL task.

By implementing these modifications in the SimCLR framework, the authors demonstrate improved performance on the VoxCeleb1-O dataset, outperforming other equivalent methods. The proposed techniques show promise in enhancing the compactness of same-speaker embeddings and reducing the number of false positives and false negatives in SV tasks, even in the presence of class collisions.

The findings of this paper contribute to the ongoing efforts in the field of self-supervised learning, particularly in the context of speaker verification, and may inspire further research in this direction.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

👁️

Total Score

0

Additive Margin in Contrastive Self-Supervised Frameworks to Learn Discriminative Speaker Representations

Theo Lepage, Reda Dehak

Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) frameworks became the standard for learning robust class representations by benefiting from large unlabeled datasets. For Speaker Verification (SV), most SSL systems rely on contrastive-based loss functions. We explore different ways to improve the performance of these techniques by revisiting the NT-Xent contrastive loss. Our main contribution is the definition of the NT-Xent-AM loss and the study of the importance of Additive Margin (AM) in SimCLR and MoCo SSL methods to further separate positive from negative pairs. Despite class collisions, we show that AM enhances the compactness of same-speaker embeddings and reduces the number of false negatives and false positives on SV. Additionally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the symmetric contrastive loss, which provides more supervision for the SSL task. Implementing these two modifications to SimCLR improves performance and results in 7.85% EER on VoxCeleb1-O, outperforming other equivalent methods.

Read more

4/24/2024

📈

Total Score

0

Experimenting with Additive Margins for Contrastive Self-Supervised Speaker Verification

Theo Lepage, Reda Dehak

Most state-of-the-art self-supervised speaker verification systems rely on a contrastive-based objective function to learn speaker representations from unlabeled speech data. We explore different ways to improve the performance of these methods by: (1) revisiting how positive and negative pairs are sampled through a symmetric formulation of the contrastive loss; (2) introducing margins similar to AM-Softmax and AAM-Softmax that have been widely adopted in the supervised setting. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the symmetric contrastive loss which provides more supervision for the self-supervised task. Moreover, we show that Additive Margin and Additive Angular Margin allow reducing the overall number of false negatives and false positives by improving speaker separability. Finally, by combining both techniques and training a larger model we achieve 7.50% EER and 0.5804 minDCF on the VoxCeleb1 test set, which outperforms other contrastive self supervised methods on speaker verification.

Read more

4/26/2024

Exploring Self-Supervised Multi-view Contrastive Learning for Speech Emotion Recognition with Limited Annotations
Total Score

0

Exploring Self-Supervised Multi-view Contrastive Learning for Speech Emotion Recognition with Limited Annotations

Bulat Khaertdinov, Pedro Jeuris, Annanda Sousa, Enrique Hortal

Recent advancements in Deep and Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) have led to substantial improvements in Speech Emotion Recognition (SER) performance, reaching unprecedented levels. However, obtaining sufficient amounts of accurately labeled data for training or fine-tuning the models remains a costly and challenging task. In this paper, we propose a multi-view SSL pre-training technique that can be applied to various representations of speech, including the ones generated by large speech models, to improve SER performance in scenarios where annotations are limited. Our experiments, based on wav2vec 2.0, spectral and paralinguistic features, demonstrate that the proposed framework boosts the SER performance, by up to 10% in Unweighted Average Recall, in settings with extremely sparse data annotations.

Read more

6/13/2024

Contrastive Learning with Synthetic Positives
Total Score

0

Contrastive Learning with Synthetic Positives

Dewen Zeng, Yawen Wu, Xinrong Hu, Xiaowei Xu, Yiyu Shi

Contrastive learning with the nearest neighbor has proved to be one of the most efficient self-supervised learning (SSL) techniques by utilizing the similarity of multiple instances within the same class. However, its efficacy is constrained as the nearest neighbor algorithm primarily identifies ``easy'' positive pairs, where the representations are already closely located in the embedding space. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach called Contrastive Learning with Synthetic Positives (CLSP) that utilizes synthetic images, generated by an unconditional diffusion model, as the additional positives to help the model learn from diverse positives. Through feature interpolation in the diffusion model sampling process, we generate images with distinct backgrounds yet similar semantic content to the anchor image. These images are considered ``hard'' positives for the anchor image, and when included as supplementary positives in the contrastive loss, they contribute to a performance improvement of over 2% and 1% in linear evaluation compared to the previous NNCLR and All4One methods across multiple benchmark datasets such as CIFAR10, achieving state-of-the-art methods. On transfer learning benchmarks, CLSP outperforms existing SSL frameworks on 6 out of 8 downstream datasets. We believe CLSP establishes a valuable baseline for future SSL studies incorporating synthetic data in the training process.

Read more

9/2/2024