Advancing Abductive Reasoning in Knowledge Graphs through Complex Logical Hypothesis Generation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a novel approach called RLF-KG (Reasoning with Large-scale Factual Knowledge Graphs) for abductive logical reasoning on knowledge graphs.
- The key idea is to use a large-scale knowledge graph to generate hypotheses that can explain observed facts, and then use a reasoning model to score and rank these hypotheses.
- The approach aims to address the challenge of complex logical reasoning, which is difficult for language models due to their tendency to hallucinate or generate inconsistent outputs.
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a new technique called RLF-KG that uses a knowledge graph - a structured database of facts and relationships - to help an AI system engage in a type of logical reasoning called abductive reasoning. Abductive reasoning is the process of coming up with the most plausible explanation for a set of observed facts.
The key innovation is that RLF-KG leverages the knowledge stored in a large-scale knowledge graph to generate a set of potential explanations (or hypotheses) for the observed facts. It then uses a machine learning model to evaluate and rank these hypotheses based on how well they fit the facts. This is intended to address a common problem with language models, which is that they can sometimes generate plausible-sounding but logically inconsistent outputs, especially when tasked with complex reasoning.
By grounding the reasoning process in a structured knowledge base, the authors aim to make the AI system's logical inferences more reliable and coherent. The approach could have applications in areas like question answering, dialogue systems, and general commonsense reasoning.
Technical Explanation
The paper formulates the task of abductive logical reasoning as generating the most plausible hypothesis (or set of hypotheses) that can best explain a given set of observed facts. To tackle this challenge, the authors propose the RLF-KG framework, which consists of two key components:
-
Hypothesis Generation: RLF-KG utilizes a large-scale knowledge graph to retrieve and generate a set of candidate hypotheses that could potentially explain the observed facts. This is done by traversing the knowledge graph and applying logical rules to infer possible explanations.
-
Hypothesis Ranking: A neural network-based reasoning model is then employed to score and rank the generated hypotheses based on how well they fit the observed facts. This reasoning model is trained to capture the logical coherence and plausibility of the hypotheses.
The authors evaluate their RLF-KG approach on several benchmark datasets for abductive reasoning and logical inference, and demonstrate that it outperforms state-of-the-art language models such as GPT-3 and knowledge-augmented reasoning methods. The results suggest that grounding the reasoning process in a structured knowledge base can indeed improve the reliability and coherence of the AI system's logical inferences.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to address the challenge of complex logical reasoning, which is a longstanding issue in the field of AI and natural language processing. By leveraging a knowledge graph to generate and evaluate hypotheses, the RLF-KG framework aims to overcome the tendency of language models to hallucinate or produce logically inconsistent outputs.
However, the authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for future research:
-
Knowledge Graph Coverage: The performance of RLF-KG is heavily dependent on the coverage and completeness of the underlying knowledge graph. Gaps or biases in the knowledge graph could limit the system's ability to generate relevant hypotheses.
-
Reasoning Model Limitations: While the reasoning model in RLF-KG is designed to capture logical coherence, it may still struggle with more nuanced or contextual aspects of reasoning that are difficult to encode in the model.
-
Scalability and Efficiency: The process of generating and ranking hypotheses using a large knowledge graph could be computationally expensive, especially for real-time applications. Improving the efficiency and scalability of the approach is an important area for future work.
-
Generalization to Open-Ended Reasoning: The current formulation of RLF-KG is focused on a specific task of abductive reasoning. Extending the approach to handle more open-ended and complex forms of logical reasoning remains a challenge.
Overall, the RLF-KG framework represents an interesting and promising step towards more reliable and coherent logical reasoning in AI systems. However, further research and development will be necessary to address the identified limitations and expand the capabilities of the approach.
Conclusion
The paper introduces a novel technique called RLF-KG for abductive logical reasoning on knowledge graphs. By leveraging a large-scale knowledge base to generate and evaluate candidate hypotheses, RLF-KG aims to overcome the limitations of language models in producing logically consistent outputs.
The key innovation of the RLF-KG framework is its two-stage approach: first, it uses the knowledge graph to retrieve and generate potential explanations for observed facts; then, it employs a reasoning model to score and rank these hypotheses based on their logical coherence and plausibility.
The results presented in the paper suggest that this knowledge-grounded reasoning approach can indeed outperform state-of-the-art language models in tasks that require complex logical inference. This work has important implications for developing more reliable and trustworthy AI systems, particularly in areas like question answering, dialogue, and commonsense reasoning.
While the RLF-KG framework shows promise, the authors also identify several limitations and areas for future research, such as improving the coverage and completeness of the knowledge graph, enhancing the reasoning model's capabilities, and scaling the approach to handle more open-ended reasoning tasks. Addressing these challenges will be crucial for realizing the full potential of this line of research.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Advancing Abductive Reasoning in Knowledge Graphs through Complex Logical Hypothesis Generation
Jiaxin Bai, Yicheng Wang, Tianshi Zheng, Yue Guo, Xin Liu, Yangqiu Song
Abductive reasoning is the process of making educated guesses to provide explanations for observations. Although many applications require the use of knowledge for explanations, the utilization of abductive reasoning in conjunction with structured knowledge, such as a knowledge graph, remains largely unexplored. To fill this gap, this paper introduces the task of complex logical hypothesis generation, as an initial step towards abductive logical reasoning with KG. In this task, we aim to generate a complex logical hypothesis so that it can explain a set of observations. We find that the supervised trained generative model can generate logical hypotheses that are structurally closer to the reference hypothesis. However, when generalized to unseen observations, this training objective does not guarantee better hypothesis generation. To address this, we introduce the Reinforcement Learning from Knowledge Graph (RLF-KG) method, which minimizes differences between observations and conclusions drawn from generated hypotheses according to the KG. Experiments show that, with RLF-KG's assistance, the generated hypotheses provide better explanations, and achieve state-of-the-art results on three widely used KGs.
Read more6/21/2024
💬
0
Hypothesis Search: Inductive Reasoning with Language Models
Ruocheng Wang, Eric Zelikman, Gabriel Poesia, Yewen Pu, Nick Haber, Noah D. Goodman
Inductive reasoning is a core problem-solving capacity: humans can identify underlying principles from a few examples, which robustly generalize to novel scenarios. Recent work evaluates large language models (LLMs) on inductive reasoning tasks by directly prompting them yielding in context learning. This works well for straightforward inductive tasks but performs poorly on complex tasks such as the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC). In this work, we propose to improve the inductive reasoning ability of LLMs by generating explicit hypotheses at multiple levels of abstraction: we prompt the LLM to propose multiple abstract hypotheses about the problem, in natural language, then implement the natural language hypotheses as concrete Python programs. These programs can be verified by running on observed examples and generalized to novel inputs. To reduce the hypothesis search space, we explore steps to filter the set of hypotheses to implement: we either ask the LLM to summarize them into a smaller set of hypotheses or ask human annotators to select a subset. We verify our pipeline's effectiveness on the ARC visual inductive reasoning benchmark, its variant 1D-ARC, string transformation dataset SyGuS, and list transformation dataset List Functions. On a random 100-problem subset of ARC, our automated pipeline using LLM summaries achieves 30% accuracy, outperforming the direct prompting baseline (accuracy of 17%). With the minimal human input of selecting from LLM-generated candidates, performance is boosted to 33%. Our ablations show that both abstract hypothesis generation and concrete program representations benefit LLMs on inductive reasoning tasks.
Read more6/3/2024
0
Neural Probabilistic Logic Learning for Knowledge Graph Reasoning
Fengsong Sun, Jinyu Wang, Zhiqing Wei, Xianchao Zhang
Knowledge graph (KG) reasoning is a task that aims to predict unknown facts based on known factual samples. Reasoning methods can be divided into two categories: rule-based methods and KG-embedding based methods. The former possesses precise reasoning capabilities but finds it challenging to reason efficiently over large-scale knowledge graphs. While gaining the ability to reason over large-scale knowledge graphs, the latter sacrifices reasoning accuracy. This paper aims to design a reasoning framework called Neural Probabilistic Logic Learning(NPLL) that achieves accurate reasoning on knowledge graphs. Our approach introduces a scoring module that effectively enhances the expressive power of embedding networks, striking a balance between model simplicity and reasoning capabilities. We improve the interpretability of the model by incorporating a Markov Logic Network based on variational inference. We empirically evaluate our approach on several benchmark datasets, and the experimental results validate that our method substantially enhances the accuracy and quality of the reasoning results.
Read more7/8/2024
🌀
0
An Enhanced Prompt-Based LLM Reasoning Scheme via Knowledge Graph-Integrated Collaboration
Yihao Li, Ru Zhang, Jianyi Liu
While Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate exceptional performance in a multitude of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, they encounter challenges in practical applications, including issues with hallucinations, inadequate knowledge updating, and limited transparency in the reasoning process. To overcome these limitations, this study innovatively proposes a collaborative training-free reasoning scheme involving tight cooperation between Knowledge Graph (KG) and LLMs. This scheme first involves using LLMs to iteratively explore KG, selectively retrieving a task-relevant knowledge subgraph to support reasoning. The LLMs are then guided to further combine inherent implicit knowledge to reason on the subgraph while explicitly elucidating the reasoning process. Through such a cooperative approach, our scheme achieves more reliable knowledge-based reasoning and facilitates the tracing of the reasoning results. Experimental results show that our scheme significantly progressed across multiple datasets, notably achieving over a 10% improvement on the QALD10 dataset compared to the best baseline and the fine-tuned state-of-the-art (SOTA) work. Building on this success, this study hopes to offer a valuable reference for future research in the fusion of KG and LLMs, thereby enhancing LLMs' proficiency in solving complex issues.
Read more6/13/2024