FiDeLiS: Faithful Reasoning in Large Language Model for Knowledge Graph Question Answering

Overview

• Large language models (LLMs) have achieved significant success, but often struggle with hallucinations, especially in scenarios requiring deep and responsible reasoning
• Integrating external knowledge graphs (KGs) in LLM reasoning could help mitigate these issues, but the method of incorporation is still largely unexplored
• This paper proposes a retrieval-exploration interactive method called FiDelis to handle intermediate steps of reasoning grounded by KGs

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can perform a variety of tasks, such as generating human-like text, answering questions, and even writing code. However, these models can sometimes produce information that is not accurate or truthful, a phenomenon known as "hallucinations." This can be particularly problematic in scenarios that require deep and responsible reasoning, such as medical diagnosis or legal analysis.

One potential solution to this problem is to integrate external knowledge graphs (KGs) into the LLM's reasoning process. KGs are structured databases that store information about concepts and their relationships. By tapping into the knowledge and logic stored in KGs, LLMs could potentially make more informed and reliable decisions.

The paper proposes a new method called FiDelis that aims to leverage the strengths of both LLMs and KGs. FiDelis uses a process of "retrieval-exploration" to allow the LLM to access relevant information from the KG and then use its own reasoning capabilities to draw conclusions. This approach is designed to provide more accurate and trustworthy results than LLMs alone.

The key innovation in FiDelis is the "Path-RAG" module, which helps the LLM recall and incorporate useful intermediate knowledge from the KG during the reasoning process. By taking into account the logic and common-sense reasoning of the LLM, as well as the topological connectivity of the KG, this module can provide more accurate and relevant information to the LLM.

Furthermore, the paper proposes to leverage the deductive reasoning capabilities of LLMs as a way to automatically guide the reasoning process and determine when to stop searching for additional information. This "deductive verification" step helps to ensure that the final conclusions are sound and well-supported, avoiding misleading chains of reasoning and unnecessary computation.

Overall, the FiDelis method represents a promising approach to improving the reliability and trustworthiness of LLMs, particularly in scenarios that require deep and responsible reasoning.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a retrieval-exploration interactive method called FiDelis to handle intermediate steps of reasoning grounded by knowledge graphs (KGs). The key components of the FiDelis approach are:

1. Path-RAG Module: This module is responsible for recalling useful intermediate knowledge from the KG to support the LLM's reasoning process. It takes into account both the logic and common-sense reasoning of the LLM, as well as the topological connectivity of the KG, to provide more accurate and relevant information.

2. Deductive Verification: The paper proposes to leverage the deductive reasoning capabilities of LLMs as a way to automatically guide the reasoning process and determine when to stop searching for additional information. This "deductive verification" step helps to ensure that the final conclusions are sound and well-supported, avoiding misleading chains of reasoning and unnecessary computation.

The authors conducted extensive experiments to evaluate the performance of the FiDelis method on three benchmark datasets. The results show that FiDelis, as a training-free method with lower computational cost and better generality, outperforms existing strong baselines.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach to improving the reliability and trustworthiness of LLMs, particularly in scenarios that require deep and responsible reasoning. The integration of KGs and the use of deductive verification are novel and potentially impactful ideas.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations and areas for further research:

1. Scalability: The performance of the Path-RAG module and the deductive verification process may depend on the size and complexity of the underlying KG. The paper does not discuss how the method would scale to larger or more diverse KGs.

2. Interpretability: While the deductive verification step is intended to improve the trustworthiness of the LLM's reasoning, the paper does not explore how this process could be made more interpretable and transparent to users. Curiousity and Logic-Query-Thoughts are two other papers that have looked at improving the interpretability of LLM reasoning.

3. Generalization: The paper focuses on the performance of FiDelis on specific benchmark datasets. It would be valuable to see how the method performs in more real-world, open-ended scenarios where the LLM may encounter a wider range of knowledge domains and reasoning challenges.

4. Bias and Fairness: Like any AI system, the LLM and KG used in FiDelis could potentially reflect or amplify societal biases. The paper does not discuss how these issues might be mitigated or addressed.

Overall, the FiDelis method represents an important step forward in improving the reliability and trustworthiness of LLMs, but there is still work to be done to address the broader challenges of multi-hop question answering over knowledge graphs and responsible AI development.

Conclusion

The paper proposes a novel retrieval-exploration interactive method called FiDelis to handle intermediate steps of reasoning grounded by knowledge graphs (KGs). By integrating the logic and common-sense reasoning of large language models (LLMs) with the topological connectivity of KGs, FiDelis aims to provide more accurate and trustworthy results compared to LLMs alone.

The key innovations in FiDelis are the Path-RAG module for recalling useful intermediate knowledge from the KG, and the use of deductive verification to automatically guide the reasoning process and avoid misleading conclusions. Extensive experiments show that FiDelis outperforms existing strong baselines, suggesting that this approach has significant potential to improve the reliability and trustworthiness of LLMs, particularly in scenarios that require deep and responsible reasoning.

While the paper presents a promising step forward, there are still some limitations and areas for further research, such as scalability, interpretability, generalization, and bias mitigation. Addressing these challenges will be crucial for realizing the full potential of methods like FiDelis in real-world applications.