Improving Complex Reasoning over Knowledge Graph with Logic-Aware Curriculum Tuning

Read original: arXiv:2405.01649 - Published 5/10/2024 by Tianle Xia, Liang Ding, Guojia Wan, Yibing Zhan, Bo Du, Dacheng Tao
Total Score

0

Improving Complex Reasoning over Knowledge Graph with Logic-Aware Curriculum Tuning

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a novel approach called "Logic-Aware Curriculum Tuning" for improving complex reasoning over knowledge graphs.
  • The key idea is to leverage logical constraints and curriculum learning to guide the training of large language models for knowledge graph reasoning tasks.
  • The proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on several benchmark datasets, demonstrating the effectiveness of incorporating logical reasoning into the training process.

Plain English Explanation

Knowledge graphs are structured databases that store information about entities and their relationships. Reasoning over knowledge graphs is an important task in artificial intelligence, with applications in areas like question answering and decision support. However, performing complex reasoning on knowledge graphs can be challenging, as it requires understanding the underlying logical structure and semantics.

The authors of this paper introduce a new technique called "Logic-Aware Curriculum Tuning" to address this challenge. The key insight is to incorporate logical constraints and curriculum learning into the training process for large language models used for knowledge graph reasoning.

Curriculum learning is a machine learning approach where the model is trained on progressively more complex tasks, starting with easier ones and gradually increasing the difficulty. The authors apply this concept to knowledge graph reasoning, starting with simple logical constraints and gradually introducing more complex ones during training.

By guiding the model's learning process in this way, the researchers were able to significantly improve the model's ability to perform complex logical reasoning over knowledge graphs. The proposed method outperformed state-of-the-art baselines on several benchmark datasets, demonstrating the effectiveness of this approach.

Technical Explanation

The authors develop a novel training framework called "Logic-Aware Curriculum Tuning" (LACT) to improve the complex reasoning capabilities of large language models on knowledge graph tasks. The key components of LACT are:

  1. Logical Constraints: The researchers define a set of logical rules and constraints that capture the semantic structure of the knowledge graph. These constraints are used to guide the model's learning process.

  2. Curriculum Learning: The training process follows a curriculum-based approach, where the model is first trained on simpler reasoning tasks with fewer logical constraints, and then gradually exposed to more complex tasks with additional constraints.

  3. Knowledge Injector: The authors introduce a "Knowledge Injector" module that incorporates the logical constraints into the language model's training. This module ensures that the model respects the logical structure of the knowledge graph during the learning process.

The researchers evaluate their approach on several benchmark datasets for knowledge graph reasoning, including ComplexWebQuestions and CSQA. The results show that the proposed LACT framework outperforms state-of-the-art methods, demonstrating the effectiveness of incorporating logical reasoning into the training of large language models for complex knowledge graph tasks.

Critical Analysis

The researchers provide a comprehensive evaluation of their proposed method, including comparisons to various baselines and ablation studies to understand the contributions of different components. However, the paper does not discuss potential limitations or areas for future research in depth.

One potential limitation is the scalability of the approach, as the definition and incorporation of logical constraints may become increasingly complex as the knowledge graph grows in size and complexity. The authors could explore ways to automate or learn the logical constraints from the data, rather than relying on manual definition.

Additionally, the paper does not address the interpretability of the trained models or provide insights into the specific reasoning strategies learned by the models. Exploring these aspects could further enhance the understanding and practical applications of the proposed approach.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel framework called "Logic-Aware Curriculum Tuning" that effectively incorporates logical reasoning into the training of large language models for knowledge graph tasks. By leveraging logical constraints and curriculum learning, the proposed method significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on several benchmark datasets.

The key contribution of this work is the demonstration that incorporating logical reasoning into the training process can substantially improve the complex reasoning capabilities of large language models. This has important implications for the development of more robust and interpretable AI systems that can better understand and reason about the world around them.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Improving Complex Reasoning over Knowledge Graph with Logic-Aware Curriculum Tuning
Total Score

0

Improving Complex Reasoning over Knowledge Graph with Logic-Aware Curriculum Tuning

Tianle Xia, Liang Ding, Guojia Wan, Yibing Zhan, Bo Du, Dacheng Tao

Answering complex queries over incomplete knowledge graphs (KGs) is a challenging job. Most previous works have focused on learning entity/relation embeddings and simulating first-order logic operators with various neural networks. However, they are bottlenecked by the inability to share world knowledge to improve logical reasoning, thus resulting in suboptimal performance. In this paper, we propose a complex reasoning schema over KG upon large language models (LLMs), containing a curriculum-based logical-aware instruction tuning framework, named LACT. Specifically, we augment the arbitrary first-order logical queries via binary tree decomposition, to stimulate the reasoning capability of LLMs. To address the difficulty gap among different types of complex queries, we design a simple and flexible logic-aware curriculum learning framework. Experiments across widely used datasets demonstrate that LACT has substantial improvements~(brings an average +5.5% MRR score) over advanced methods, achieving the new state-of-the-art. Our code and model will be released at GitHub and huggingface soon.

Read more

5/10/2024

CLR-Fact: Evaluating the Complex Logical Reasoning Capability of Large Language Models over Factual Knowledge
Total Score

0

CLR-Fact: Evaluating the Complex Logical Reasoning Capability of Large Language Models over Factual Knowledge

Tianshi Zheng, Jiaxin Bai, Yicheng Wang, Tianqing Fang, Yue Guo, Yauwai Yim, Yangqiu Song

While large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities across various natural language processing tasks by acquiring rich factual knowledge from their broad training data, their ability to synthesize and logically reason with this knowledge in complex ways remains underexplored. In this work, we present a systematic evaluation of state-of-the-art LLMs' complex logical reasoning abilities through a novel benchmark of automatically generated complex reasoning questions over general domain and biomedical knowledge graphs. Our extensive experiments, employing diverse in-context learning techniques, reveal that LLMs excel at reasoning over general world knowledge but face significant challenges with specialized domain-specific knowledge. We find that prompting with explicit Chain-of-Thought demonstrations can substantially improve LLM performance on complex logical reasoning tasks with diverse logical operations. Interestingly, our controlled evaluations uncover an asymmetry where LLMs display proficiency at set union operations, but struggle considerably with set intersections - a key building block of logical reasoning. To foster further work, we will publicly release our evaluation benchmark and code.

Read more

7/31/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Logic Query of Thoughts: Guiding Large Language Models to Answer Complex Logic Queries with Knowledge Graphs

Lihui Liu, Zihao Wang, Ruizhong Qiu, Yikun Ban, Eunice Chan, Yangqiu Song, Jingrui He, Hanghang Tong

Despite the superb performance in many tasks, large language models (LLMs) bear the risk of generating hallucination or even wrong answers when confronted with tasks that demand the accuracy of knowledge. The issue becomes even more noticeable when addressing logic queries that require multiple logic reasoning steps. On the other hand, knowledge graph (KG) based question answering methods are capable of accurately identifying the correct answers with the help of knowledge graph, yet its accuracy could quickly deteriorate when the knowledge graph itself is sparse and incomplete. It remains a critical challenge on how to integrate knowledge graph reasoning with LLMs in a mutually beneficial way so as to mitigate both the hallucination problem of LLMs as well as the incompleteness issue of knowledge graphs. In this paper, we propose 'Logic-Query-of-Thoughts' (LGOT) which is the first of its kind to combine LLMs with knowledge graph based logic query reasoning. LGOT seamlessly combines knowledge graph reasoning and LLMs, effectively breaking down complex logic queries into easy to answer subquestions. Through the utilization of both knowledge graph reasoning and LLMs, it successfully derives answers for each subquestion. By aggregating these results and selecting the highest quality candidate answers for each step, LGOT achieves accurate results to complex questions. Our experimental findings demonstrate substantial performance enhancements, with up to 20% improvement over ChatGPT.

Read more

4/16/2024

🌀

Total Score

0

An Enhanced Prompt-Based LLM Reasoning Scheme via Knowledge Graph-Integrated Collaboration

Yihao Li, Ru Zhang, Jianyi Liu

While Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate exceptional performance in a multitude of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, they encounter challenges in practical applications, including issues with hallucinations, inadequate knowledge updating, and limited transparency in the reasoning process. To overcome these limitations, this study innovatively proposes a collaborative training-free reasoning scheme involving tight cooperation between Knowledge Graph (KG) and LLMs. This scheme first involves using LLMs to iteratively explore KG, selectively retrieving a task-relevant knowledge subgraph to support reasoning. The LLMs are then guided to further combine inherent implicit knowledge to reason on the subgraph while explicitly elucidating the reasoning process. Through such a cooperative approach, our scheme achieves more reliable knowledge-based reasoning and facilitates the tracing of the reasoning results. Experimental results show that our scheme significantly progressed across multiple datasets, notably achieving over a 10% improvement on the QALD10 dataset compared to the best baseline and the fine-tuned state-of-the-art (SOTA) work. Building on this success, this study hopes to offer a valuable reference for future research in the fusion of KG and LLMs, thereby enhancing LLMs' proficiency in solving complex issues.

Read more

6/13/2024