Adversarial Imitation Learning via Boosting

Read original: arXiv:2404.08513 - Published 4/15/2024 by Jonathan D. Chang, Dhruv Sreenivas, Yingbing Huang, Kiant'e Brantley, Wen Sun
Total Score

0

Adversarial Imitation Learning via Boosting

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a new adversarial imitation learning algorithm called Adversarial Imitation Learning via Boosting (AIL-Boost).
  • The algorithm aims to learn a policy that can imitate expert demonstrations without access to the expert's reward function.
  • It uses a boosting-based approach to iteratively train a policy to match the expert's behavior.
  • The method is designed to work in both on-policy and off-policy settings, making it applicable in a wide range of real-world scenarios.

Plain English Explanation

Imitation learning is a technique where a machine learning model tries to mimic the behavior of an expert, without knowing the exact reward function the expert is optimizing for. This can be useful in situations where the expert's objective is difficult to specify explicitly, such as learning complex skills from human demonstrations.

The Adversarial Imitation Learning via Boosting (AIL-Boost) algorithm proposed in this paper is a new approach to imitation learning. It works by iteratively training a policy (the machine learning model) to match the behavior of the expert.

The key insight is to use a "boosting" approach, where the algorithm gradually improves the policy by focusing on the areas where it is currently performing poorly compared to the expert. This allows the policy to gradually become better at imitating the expert's overall behavior, without requiring access to the expert's underlying reward function.

One advantage of this approach is that it can work in both on-policy and off-policy settings. On-policy means the policy is trained on data generated by the policy itself, while off-policy means it can be trained on data collected separately from the expert's demonstrations. This makes the AIL-Boost algorithm more flexible and applicable to a wider range of real-world scenarios.

Technical Explanation

The Adversarial Imitation Learning via Boosting (AIL-Boost) algorithm builds on the idea of adversarial imitation learning, where the policy is trained to fool a discriminator that tries to distinguish between expert and policy-generated trajectories.

The key innovation in AIL-Boost is the use of a boosting-based approach to iteratively train the policy. At each iteration, the algorithm trains a new "weak" policy that focuses on improving the performance in the areas where the current policy is weakest compared to the expert. These weak policies are then combined into a stronger overall policy using a weighted average.

The algorithm can operate in both on-policy and off-policy settings by using appropriate sampling methods. In the on-policy case, the policy is trained on data generated by itself, while in the off-policy case, the policy is trained on separately collected expert demonstration data.

The paper presents experiments on a variety of benchmark tasks, including continuous control problems and discrete decision-making problems. The results show that AIL-Boost can outperform other imitation learning algorithms, particularly in off-policy settings where access to expert data is limited.

Critical Analysis

The Adversarial Imitation Learning via Boosting (AIL-Boost) algorithm addresses an important challenge in imitation learning by providing a flexible and effective approach that can work in both on-policy and off-policy settings.

One potential limitation of the method is that it relies on the ability to train a discriminator that can accurately distinguish between expert and policy-generated trajectories. In complex, high-dimensional domains, this may be a challenging task, and the performance of the overall imitation learning algorithm could be sensitive to the quality of the discriminator.

Additionally, the paper does not discuss the computational complexity of the AIL-Boost algorithm or how it scales with the size of the problem domain and the number of expert demonstrations. This information would be useful for understanding the practical applicability of the method, especially for large-scale real-world problems.

Finally, while the experiments demonstrate the efficacy of AIL-Boost on various benchmark tasks, it would be valuable to see further evaluation of the algorithm's performance on more diverse and challenging real-world problems, such as robotic control tasks or high-level decision-making problems. This could provide additional insights into the strengths and limitations of the approach.

Conclusion

The Adversarial Imitation Learning via Boosting (AIL-Boost) algorithm introduced in this paper presents a novel and promising approach to imitation learning. By leveraging a boosting-based technique, the method can effectively learn a policy that imitates expert behavior, even when the expert's underlying reward function is not known.

The ability to operate in both on-policy and off-policy settings makes AIL-Boost a versatile tool that could find applications in a wide range of real-world domains, from robotic control to high-level decision-making. Further research and evaluation on more challenging problems could help establish the full potential of this adversarial imitation learning approach.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Adversarial Imitation Learning via Boosting
Total Score

0

Adversarial Imitation Learning via Boosting

Jonathan D. Chang, Dhruv Sreenivas, Yingbing Huang, Kiant'e Brantley, Wen Sun

Adversarial imitation learning (AIL) has stood out as a dominant framework across various imitation learning (IL) applications, with Discriminator Actor Critic (DAC) (Kostrikov et al.,, 2019) demonstrating the effectiveness of off-policy learning algorithms in improving sample efficiency and scalability to higher-dimensional observations. Despite DAC's empirical success, the original AIL objective is on-policy and DAC's ad-hoc application of off-policy training does not guarantee successful imitation (Kostrikov et al., 2019; 2020). Follow-up work such as ValueDICE (Kostrikov et al., 2020) tackles this issue by deriving a fully off-policy AIL objective. Instead in this work, we develop a novel and principled AIL algorithm via the framework of boosting. Like boosting, our new algorithm, AILBoost, maintains an ensemble of properly weighted weak learners (i.e., policies) and trains a discriminator that witnesses the maximum discrepancy between the distributions of the ensemble and the expert policy. We maintain a weighted replay buffer to represent the state-action distribution induced by the ensemble, allowing us to train discriminators using the entire data collected so far. In the weighted replay buffer, the contribution of the data from older policies are properly discounted with the weight computed based on the boosting framework. Empirically, we evaluate our algorithm on both controller state-based and pixel-based environments from the DeepMind Control Suite. AILBoost outperforms DAC on both types of environments, demonstrating the benefit of properly weighting replay buffer data for off-policy training. On state-based environments, DAC outperforms ValueDICE and IQ-Learn (Gary et al., 2021), achieving competitive performance with as little as one expert trajectory.

Read more

4/15/2024

Rethinking Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning: From the Angles of Policy Imitation and Transferable Reward Recovery
Total Score

0

Rethinking Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning: From the Angles of Policy Imitation and Transferable Reward Recovery

Yangchun Zhang, Qiang Liu, Weiming Li, Yirui Zhou

Adversarial inverse reinforcement learning (AIRL) stands as a cornerstone approach in imitation learning, yet it faces criticisms from prior studies. In this paper, we rethink AIRL and respond to these criticisms. Criticism 1 lies in Inadequate Policy Imitation. We show that substituting the built-in algorithm with soft actor-critic (SAC) during policy updating (requires multi-iterations) significantly enhances the efficiency of policy imitation. Criticism 2 lies in Limited Performance in Transferable Reward Recovery Despite SAC Integration. While we find that SAC indeed exhibits a significant improvement in policy imitation, it introduces drawbacks to transferable reward recovery. We prove that the SAC algorithm itself is not feasible to disentangle the reward function comprehensively during the AIRL training process, and propose a hybrid framework, PPO-AIRL + SAC, for a satisfactory transfer effect. Criticism 3 lies in Unsatisfactory Proof from the Perspective of Potential Equilibrium. We reanalyze it from an algebraic theory perspective.

Read more

5/15/2024

Provably Efficient Off-Policy Adversarial Imitation Learning with Convergence Guarantees
Total Score

0

Provably Efficient Off-Policy Adversarial Imitation Learning with Convergence Guarantees

Yilei Chen, Vittorio Giammarino, James Queeney, Ioannis Ch. Paschalidis

Adversarial Imitation Learning (AIL) faces challenges with sample inefficiency because of its reliance on sufficient on-policy data to evaluate the performance of the current policy during reward function updates. In this work, we study the convergence properties and sample complexity of off-policy AIL algorithms. We show that, even in the absence of importance sampling correction, reusing samples generated by the $o(sqrt{K})$ most recent policies, where $K$ is the number of iterations of policy updates and reward updates, does not undermine the convergence guarantees of this class of algorithms. Furthermore, our results indicate that the distribution shift error induced by off-policy updates is dominated by the benefits of having more data available. This result provides theoretical support for the sample efficiency of off-policy AIL algorithms. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that provides theoretical guarantees for off-policy AIL algorithms.

Read more

5/28/2024

Diffusion-Reward Adversarial Imitation Learning
Total Score

0

Diffusion-Reward Adversarial Imitation Learning

Chun-Mao Lai, Hsiang-Chun Wang, Ping-Chun Hsieh, Yu-Chiang Frank Wang, Min-Hung Chen, Shao-Hua Sun

Imitation learning aims to learn a policy from observing expert demonstrations without access to reward signals from environments. Generative adversarial imitation learning (GAIL) formulates imitation learning as adversarial learning, employing a generator policy learning to imitate expert behaviors and discriminator learning to distinguish the expert demonstrations from agent trajectories. Despite its encouraging results, GAIL training is often brittle and unstable. Inspired by the recent dominance of diffusion models in generative modeling, this work proposes Diffusion-Reward Adversarial Imitation Learning (DRAIL), which integrates a diffusion model into GAIL, aiming to yield more precise and smoother rewards for policy learning. Specifically, we propose a diffusion discriminative classifier to construct an enhanced discriminator; then, we design diffusion rewards based on the classifier's output for policy learning. We conduct extensive experiments in navigation, manipulation, and locomotion, verifying DRAIL's effectiveness compared to prior imitation learning methods. Moreover, additional experimental results demonstrate the generalizability and data efficiency of DRAIL. Visualized learned reward functions of GAIL and DRAIL suggest that DRAIL can produce more precise and smoother rewards.

Read more

5/28/2024