AI Royalties -- an IP Framework to Compensate Artists & IP Holders for AI-Generated Content
0
🤖
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates how AI-generated content can disrupt revenue streams for creative industries, particularly through the collection of intellectual property (IP) rights.
- It reviews the IP and copyright questions related to the input and output of generative AI systems.
- A method is proposed to assess whether AI-generated outputs, especially images, infringe on previous copyrights using a similarity metric.
- The financial implications of previously proposed compensation frameworks for creatives and IP holders are examined.
- A novel IP framework is proposed for compensating artists and IP holders based on their published licensed AIs as a new medium and asset to collect AI royalties.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how the rise of AI-generated content could disrupt the way creative industries make money, especially from the intellectual property (IP) rights of their work. It explores the legal questions around the input data and output of these AI systems.
The researchers suggest a way to automatically check if AI-generated images might be copying previous copyrighted works, by comparing them using a special computer vision technique. They also analyze the financial impact of different proposals for compensating artists and IP owners when their work is used by AI.
Ultimately, the paper proposes a new system where artists and IP holders could get royalties from the AI models they publish and license, turning those models into a new kind of asset that can generate revenue. This could help creatives get paid when their work is used by AI-generated content.
Technical Explanation
The paper first reviews the existing IP and copyright issues around generative AI systems, including questions of authorship and ownership of the input data and output content.
To assess potential copyright infringement by AI-generated images, the researchers propose using a similarity metric called CLIP to compare the AI outputs against a database of historical copyright rulings. This automated approach could help identify cases where the AI may have copied previous artistic works.
The paper also examines the financial feasibility of previously suggested compensation frameworks, such as data Shapley, for creatives and IP holders whose work is used by generative AI.
Finally, the researchers propose a novel IP framework where artists and IP owners could earn royalties from the AI models they publish and license. This turns the models themselves into a new medium and asset that can generate revenue, potentially providing a new income stream for creatives.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thoughtful analysis of the complex copyright challenges posed by generative AI systems. The proposed CLIP-based approach for assessing image similarity and potential infringement is an interesting technical solution, though its accuracy and effectiveness would need further evaluation.
The examination of existing compensation frameworks highlights the difficult tradeoffs and financial implications for creatives and IP holders. The new royalty-based model for licensed AI models is an innovative idea, but its practical implementation and adoption would likely face significant hurdles.
Additional research is still needed to fully understand the broader societal impacts of AI-generated content and develop comprehensive frameworks for protecting the rights of artists and intellectual property owners. Careful consideration of ethical concerns, potential biases, and unintended consequences will be crucial as these technologies continue to advance.
Conclusion
This paper offers a multifaceted investigation into how the rise of generative AI could disrupt the creative industries' traditional revenue streams from intellectual property rights. By proposing technical solutions, analyzing economic feasibility, and outlining a novel IP framework, the researchers seek to address the complex copyright challenges at the intersection of AI and creative work.
While further research and real-world testing are needed, the ideas presented in this paper provide valuable contributions towards developing fair and sustainable models for compensating artists and IP holders in the era of AI-generated content.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤖
0
AI Royalties -- an IP Framework to Compensate Artists & IP Holders for AI-Generated Content
Pablo Ducru, Jonathan Raiman, Ronaldo Lemos, Clay Garner, George He, Hanna Balcha, Gabriel Souto, Sergio Branco, Celina Bottino
This article investigates how AI-generated content can disrupt central revenue streams of the creative industries, in particular the collection of dividends from intellectual property (IP) rights. It reviews the IP and copyright questions related to the input and output of generative AI systems. A systematic method is proposed to assess whether AI-generated outputs, especially images, infringe previous copyrights, using a similarity metric (CLIP) between images against historical copyright rulings. An examination (economic and technical feasibility) of previously proposed compensation frameworks reveals their financial implications for creatives and IP holders. Lastly, we propose a novel IP framework for compensation of artists and IP holders based on their published licensed AIs as a new medium and asset from which to collect AI royalties.
Read more6/19/2024
0
An Economic Solution to Copyright Challenges of Generative AI
Jiachen T. Wang, Zhun Deng, Hiroaki Chiba-Okabe, Boaz Barak, Weijie J. Su
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) systems are trained on large data corpora to generate new pieces of text, images, videos, and other media. There is growing concern that such systems may infringe on the copyright interests of training data contributors. To address the copyright challenges of generative AI, we propose a framework that compensates copyright owners proportionally to their contributions to the creation of AI-generated content. The metric for contributions is quantitatively determined by leveraging the probabilistic nature of modern generative AI models and using techniques from cooperative game theory in economics. This framework enables a platform where AI developers benefit from access to high-quality training data, thus improving model performance. Meanwhile, copyright owners receive fair compensation, driving the continued provision of relevant data for generative model training. Experiments demonstrate that our framework successfully identifies the most relevant data sources used in artwork generation, ensuring a fair and interpretable distribution of revenues among copyright owners.
Read more9/10/2024
0
Computational Copyright: Towards A Royalty Model for Music Generative AI
Junwei Deng, Shiyuan Zhang, Jiaqi Ma
The advancement of generative AI has given rise to pressing copyright challenges, especially within the music industry. This paper focuses on the economic aspects of these challenges, emphasizing that the economic impact constitutes a central issue in the copyright arena. Furthermore, the complexity of the black-box generative AI technologies not only suggests but necessitates algorithmic solutions. Yet, such solutions have been largely missing, exacerbating regulatory hurdles in this landscape. We seek to address this gap by proposing viable royalty models for revenue sharing on AI music generation platforms. We start by examining existing royalty models utilized by platforms like Spotify and YouTube, and then discuss how to adapt them to the unique context of AI-generated music. A significant challenge emerging from this adaptation is the attribution of AI-generated music to influential copyrighted content in the training data. To this end, we present algorithmic solutions employing data attribution techniques. We also conduct a range of experiments to verify the effectiveness and robustness of these solutions. This research is one of the early attempts to integrate technical advancements with economic and legal considerations in the field of music generative AI, offering a computational copyright solution for the challenges posed by the opaque nature of AI technologies.
Read more7/23/2024
🤖
0
Uncertain Boundaries: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Copyright Issues in Generative AI
Jocelyn Dzuong, Zichong Wang, Wenbin Zhang
In the rapidly evolving landscape of generative artificial intelligence (AI), the increasingly pertinent issue of copyright infringement arises as AI advances to generate content from scraped copyrighted data, prompting questions about ownership and protection that impact professionals across various careers. With this in mind, this survey provides an extensive examination of copyright infringement as it pertains to generative AI, aiming to stay abreast of the latest developments and open problems. Specifically, it will first outline methods of detecting copyright infringement in mediums such as text, image, and video. Next, it will delve an exploration of existing techniques aimed at safeguarding copyrighted works from generative models. Furthermore, this survey will discuss resources and tools for users to evaluate copyright violations. Finally, insights into ongoing regulations and proposals for AI will be explored and compared. Through combining these disciplines, the implications of AI-driven content and copyright are thoroughly illustrated and brought into question.
Read more4/15/2024