Air Gap: Protecting Privacy-Conscious Conversational Agents
0
🔮
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Discusses the privacy concerns associated with the growing use of large language model (LLM)-based conversational agents to manage sensitive user data.
- Introduces a novel threat model where adversarial third-party apps manipulate the context of interaction to trick LLM-based agents into revealing private information.
- Proposes AirGapAgent, a privacy-conscious agent designed to prevent unintended data leakage.
- Validates the effectiveness of the AirGapAgent approach through extensive experiments using various LLM models.
Plain English Explanation
Conversational AI agents powered by large language models (LLMs) are becoming increasingly common, but they can pose a significant threat to user privacy. These agents are great at understanding and responding to the context of a conversation, but this capability can be exploited by malicious actors.
Imagine a scenario where a third-party app tries to trick an LLM-based agent into revealing private information that's not relevant to the task at hand. For example, the app might try to manipulate the context of the conversation to get the agent to share sensitive personal details, even if that information isn't needed to complete the original task.
To address this issue, the researchers introduce AirGapAgent, a privacy-conscious agent that's designed to restrict its access to only the data necessary for a specific task. This helps prevent unintended data leaks, even in the face of these context hijacking attacks.
Through extensive experiments using different LLM models, the researchers demonstrate that the AirGapAgent approach is highly effective at mitigating this form of attack. For instance, they show that a single-query context hijacking attack can reduce a standard Gemini Ultra agent's ability to protect user data from 94% to just 45%, while the AirGapAgent maintains a 97% protection rate, rendering the attack ineffective.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel threat model where adversarial third-party apps manipulate the context of interaction to trick LLM-based conversational agents into revealing private information that is not relevant to the task at hand. This is a significant concern, as these agents are highly capable of understanding and responding to context, which can be exploited by malicious actors.
To address this issue, the researchers propose AirGapAgent, a privacy-conscious agent designed to prevent unintended data leakage. The AirGapAgent restricts the agent's access to only the data necessary for a specific task, grounded in the framework of contextual integrity.
The researchers conduct extensive experiments using Gemini, GPT, and Mistral models as agents to validate the effectiveness of the AirGapAgent approach. They demonstrate that a single-query context hijacking attack can significantly reduce the ability of a standard Gemini Ultra agent to protect user data, from 94% to just 45%. In contrast, the AirGapAgent maintains a 97% protection rate, rendering the same attack ineffective.
Critical Analysis
The paper raises important concerns about the privacy risks associated with the growing use of LLM-based conversational agents and provides a promising solution in the form of the AirGapAgent. However, the researchers acknowledge that their work is limited to a specific threat model and does not address other potential attack vectors, such as prompt leakage or model capabilities.
Additionally, while the AirGapAgent approach demonstrates strong performance in the experiments, it remains to be seen how it would scale and perform in real-world deployments with diverse user interactions and evolving attack strategies. Further research is needed to explore the long-term viability and potential limitations of this approach.
Conclusion
The growing use of LLM-based conversational agents to manage sensitive user data poses significant privacy risks, as demonstrated by the novel threat model introduced in this paper. The AirGapAgent, a privacy-conscious agent designed to restrict access to only the necessary data, has shown promising results in mitigating context hijacking attacks. However, continued research and development are needed to address the broader challenges of ensuring the privacy and security of LLM-based systems, especially as they become more ubiquitous in our daily lives.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔮
0
Air Gap: Protecting Privacy-Conscious Conversational Agents
Eugene Bagdasarian, Ren Yi, Sahra Ghalebikesabi, Peter Kairouz, Marco Gruteser, Sewoong Oh, Borja Balle, Daniel Ramage
The growing use of large language model (LLM)-based conversational agents to manage sensitive user data raises significant privacy concerns. While these agents excel at understanding and acting on context, this capability can be exploited by malicious actors. We introduce a novel threat model where adversarial third-party apps manipulate the context of interaction to trick LLM-based agents into revealing private information not relevant to the task at hand. Grounded in the framework of contextual integrity, we introduce AirGapAgent, a privacy-conscious agent designed to prevent unintended data leakage by restricting the agent's access to only the data necessary for a specific task. Extensive experiments using Gemini, GPT, and Mistral models as agents validate our approach's effectiveness in mitigating this form of context hijacking while maintaining core agent functionality. For example, we show that a single-query context hijacking attack on a Gemini Ultra agent reduces its ability to protect user data from 94% to 45%, while an AirGapAgent achieves 97% protection, rendering the same attack ineffective.
Read more9/20/2024
🧪
0
Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theory
Niloofar Mireshghallah, Hyunwoo Kim, Xuhui Zhou, Yulia Tsvetkov, Maarten Sap, Reza Shokri, Yejin Choi
The interactive use of large language models (LLMs) in AI assistants (at work, home, etc.) introduces a new set of inference-time privacy risks: LLMs are fed different types of information from multiple sources in their inputs and are expected to reason about what to share in their outputs, for what purpose and with whom, within a given context. In this work, we draw attention to the highly critical yet overlooked notion of contextual privacy by proposing ConfAIde, a benchmark designed to identify critical weaknesses in the privacy reasoning capabilities of instruction-tuned LLMs. Our experiments show that even the most capable models such as GPT-4 and ChatGPT reveal private information in contexts that humans would not, 39% and 57% of the time, respectively. This leakage persists even when we employ privacy-inducing prompts or chain-of-thought reasoning. Our work underscores the immediate need to explore novel inference-time privacy-preserving approaches, based on reasoning and theory of mind.
Read more7/2/2024
0
It's a Fair Game, or Is It? Examining How Users Navigate Disclosure Risks and Benefits When Using LLM-Based Conversational Agents
Zhiping Zhang, Michelle Jia, Hao-Ping Lee, Bingsheng Yao, Sauvik Das, Ada Lerner, Dakuo Wang, Tianshi Li
The widespread use of Large Language Model (LLM)-based conversational agents (CAs), especially in high-stakes domains, raises many privacy concerns. Building ethical LLM-based CAs that respect user privacy requires an in-depth understanding of the privacy risks that concern users the most. However, existing research, primarily model-centered, does not provide insight into users' perspectives. To bridge this gap, we analyzed sensitive disclosures in real-world ChatGPT conversations and conducted semi-structured interviews with 19 LLM-based CA users. We found that users are constantly faced with trade-offs between privacy, utility, and convenience when using LLM-based CAs. However, users' erroneous mental models and the dark patterns in system design limited their awareness and comprehension of the privacy risks. Additionally, the human-like interactions encouraged more sensitive disclosures, which complicated users' ability to navigate the trade-offs. We discuss practical design guidelines and the needs for paradigm shifts to protect the privacy of LLM-based CA users.
Read more4/3/2024
0
Operationalizing Contextual Integrity in Privacy-Conscious Assistants
Sahra Ghalebikesabi, Eugene Bagdasaryan, Ren Yi, Itay Yona, Ilia Shumailov, Aneesh Pappu, Chongyang Shi, Laura Weidinger, Robert Stanforth, Leonard Berrada, Pushmeet Kohli, Po-Sen Huang, Borja Balle
Advanced AI assistants combine frontier LLMs and tool access to autonomously perform complex tasks on behalf of users. While the helpfulness of such assistants can increase dramatically with access to user information including emails and documents, this raises privacy concerns about assistants sharing inappropriate information with third parties without user supervision. To steer information-sharing assistants to behave in accordance with privacy expectations, we propose to operationalize contextual integrity (CI), a framework that equates privacy with the appropriate flow of information in a given context. In particular, we design and evaluate a number of strategies to steer assistants' information-sharing actions to be CI compliant. Our evaluation is based on a novel form filling benchmark composed of human annotations of common webform applications, and it reveals that prompting frontier LLMs to perform CI-based reasoning yields strong results.
Read more9/16/2024