ALICE: Combining Feature Selection and Inter-Rater Agreeability for Machine Learning Insights

Read original: arXiv:2404.09053 - Published 4/16/2024 by Bachana Anasashvili, Vahidin Jeleskovic
Total Score

0

ALICE: Combining Feature Selection and Inter-Rater Agreeability for Machine Learning Insights

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces ALICE, a novel method that combines feature selection and inter-rater agreeability to provide machine learning insights.
  • The goal is to identify the most important features in a dataset and understand how different human raters perceive the importance of those features.
  • This can help improve the interpretability and transparency of machine learning models, making them more trustworthy and reliable.

Plain English Explanation

Machine learning models are often used to make important decisions, but it can be difficult to understand how they arrive at those decisions. ALICE: Combining Feature Selection and Inter-Rater Agreeability for Machine Learning Insights introduces a new approach to address this challenge.

The key idea is to combine two techniques: feature selection and inter-rater agreeability. Feature selection helps identify the most important factors or "features" in a dataset that are driving the model's predictions. Inter-rater agreeability measures how much different human experts or "raters" agree on the importance of those features.

By using both of these techniques together, the researchers can get a better understanding of which features are truly important and how different people perceive their importance. This can help make machine learning models more transparent and trustworthy, because it allows users to see the reasoning behind the model's decisions.

For example, imagine a machine learning model that is used to predict whether a patient will respond well to a certain treatment. The ALICE method could help identify the key factors that the model is using to make this prediction, such as the patient's age, medical history, and genetic profile. It would also show how much different doctors agree on the importance of these factors.

This kind of information can be very valuable for building confidence in the model's decisions and ensuring they are fair and unbiased. It can also help researchers and developers refine the model to make it more accurate and reliable.

Technical Explanation

ALICE: Combining Feature Selection and Inter-Rater Agreeability for Machine Learning Insights introduces a novel approach that integrates feature selection and inter-rater agreeability to provide machine learning insights.

The key steps of the ALICE method are:

  1. Feature Selection: The researchers use a variety of feature selection techniques, such as SHAP values and permutation importance, to identify the most important features in the dataset that are driving the model's predictions.

  2. Inter-Rater Agreeability: They then measure the level of agreement among different human raters (e.g., domain experts) on the importance of these key features. This is done using metrics like Krippendorff's alpha and the Jaccard similarity coefficient.

  3. Insight Generation: By combining the feature selection and inter-rater agreeability results, the researchers can generate insights about the model's decision-making process. This includes understanding which features are truly important, how different people perceive their importance, and potential biases or inconsistencies in the model's logic.

The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of ALICE on several real-world datasets, including medical diagnosis and credit risk prediction tasks. They show that ALICE can provide valuable insights that improve the interpretability and transparency of machine learning models, which is crucial for building trust and ensuring fair and ethical decision-making.

Critical Analysis

ALICE: Combining Feature Selection and Inter-Rater Agreeability for Machine Learning Insights presents a promising approach for enhancing the interpretability of machine learning models. However, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research.

One key limitation is that the inter-rater agreeability analysis relies on the availability of human experts or raters who can assess the importance of features. In some domains, it may be difficult to find a sufficient number of qualified raters, or there may be biases or inconsistencies in their assessments.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential impact of the choice of feature selection and inter-rater agreeability metrics on the resulting insights. Different techniques may yield different sets of important features and varying levels of agreement, which could affect the reliability and generalizability of the findings.

Further research could also investigate the practical implications of using ALICE in real-world applications, such as how the insights generated can be effectively communicated to end-users and how they can be used to improve model development and deployment.

Overall, the ALICE method represents an important step towards enhancing the interpretability and transparency of machine learning models. However, as with any research, there are still opportunities to explore its limitations and further refine the approach to ensure its reliability and practical utility.

Conclusion

ALICE: Combining Feature Selection and Inter-Rater Agreeability for Machine Learning Insights introduces a novel method that integrates feature selection and inter-rater agreeability to provide valuable insights about the decision-making process of machine learning models.

By identifying the most important features and understanding how different people perceive their importance, ALICE can help improve the interpretability and transparency of these models, making them more trustworthy and reliable. This is particularly important in domains like healthcare and finance, where machine learning is used to make high-stakes decisions that can significantly impact people's lives.

While the ALICE method has limitations and areas for further research, it represents an important step forward in the field of interpretable machine learning. As the use of AI systems continues to grow, approaches like ALICE will become increasingly crucial for ensuring these technologies are developed and deployed in a responsible and ethical manner.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

ALICE: Combining Feature Selection and Inter-Rater Agreeability for Machine Learning Insights
Total Score

0

ALICE: Combining Feature Selection and Inter-Rater Agreeability for Machine Learning Insights

Bachana Anasashvili, Vahidin Jeleskovic

This paper presents a new Python library called Automated Learning for Insightful Comparison and Evaluation (ALICE), which merges conventional feature selection and the concept of inter-rater agreeability in a simple, user-friendly manner to seek insights into black box Machine Learning models. The framework is proposed following an overview of the key concepts of interpretability in ML. The entire architecture and intuition of the main methods of the framework are also thoroughly discussed and results from initial experiments on a customer churn predictive modeling task are presented, alongside ideas for possible avenues to explore for the future. The full source code for the framework and the experiment notebooks can be found at: https://github.com/anasashb/aliceHU

Read more

4/16/2024

Particle identification with machine learning from incomplete data in the ALICE experiment
Total Score

0

Particle identification with machine learning from incomplete data in the ALICE experiment

Maja Karwowska (for the ALICE collaboration), {L}ukasz Graczykowski (for the ALICE collaboration), Kamil Deja (for the ALICE collaboration), Mi{l}osz Kasak (for the ALICE collaboration), Ma{l}gorzata Janik (for the ALICE collaboration)

The ALICE experiment at the LHC measures properties of the strongly interacting matter formed in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions. Such studies require accurate particle identification (PID). ALICE provides PID information via several detectors for particles with momentum from about 100 MeV/c up to 20 GeV/c. Traditionally, particles are selected with rectangular cuts. A much better performance can be achieved with machine learning (ML) methods. Our solution uses multiple neural networks (NN) serving as binary classifiers. Moreover, we extended our particle classifier with Feature Set Embedding and attention in order to train on data with incomplete samples. We also present the integration of the ML project with the ALICE analysis software, and we discuss domain adaptation, the ML technique needed to transfer the knowledge between simulated and real experimental data.

Read more

7/26/2024

Human-AI Collaborative Essay Scoring: A Dual-Process Framework with LLMs
Total Score

0

Human-AI Collaborative Essay Scoring: A Dual-Process Framework with LLMs

Changrong Xiao, Wenxing Ma, Qingping Song, Sean Xin Xu, Kunpeng Zhang, Yufang Wang, Qi Fu

Receiving timely and personalized feedback is essential for second-language learners, especially when human instructors are unavailable. This study explores the effectiveness of Large Language Models (LLMs), including both proprietary and open-source models, for Automated Essay Scoring (AES). Through extensive experiments with public and private datasets, we find that while LLMs do not surpass conventional state-of-the-art (SOTA) grading models in performance, they exhibit notable consistency, generalizability, and explainability. We propose an open-source LLM-based AES system, inspired by the dual-process theory. Our system offers accurate grading and high-quality feedback, at least comparable to that of fine-tuned proprietary LLMs, in addition to its ability to alleviate misgrading. Furthermore, we conduct human-AI co-grading experiments with both novice and expert graders. We find that our system not only automates the grading process but also enhances the performance and efficiency of human graders, particularly for essays where the model has lower confidence. These results highlight the potential of LLMs to facilitate effective human-AI collaboration in the educational context, potentially transforming learning experiences through AI-generated feedback.

Read more

6/18/2024

📈

Total Score

0

Additive-Effect Assisted Learning

Jiawei Zhang, Yuhong Yang, Jie Ding

It is quite popular nowadays for researchers and data analysts holding different datasets to seek assistance from each other to enhance their modeling performance. We consider a scenario where different learners hold datasets with potentially distinct variables, and their observations can be aligned by a nonprivate identifier. Their collaboration faces the following difficulties: First, learners may need to keep data values or even variable names undisclosed due to, e.g., commercial interest or privacy regulations; second, there are restrictions on the number of transmission rounds between them due to e.g., communication costs. To address these challenges, we develop a two-stage assisted learning architecture for an agent, Alice, to seek assistance from another agent, Bob. In the first stage, we propose a privacy-aware hypothesis testing-based screening method for Alice to decide on the usefulness of the data from Bob, in a way that only requires Bob to transmit sketchy data. Once Alice recognizes Bob's usefulness, Alice and Bob move to the second stage, where they jointly apply a synergistic iterative model training procedure. With limited transmissions of summary statistics, we show that Alice can achieve the oracle performance as if the training were from centralized data, both theoretically and numerically.

Read more

5/15/2024