Aligning Human Knowledge with Visual Concepts Towards Explainable Medical Image Classification
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a novel approach for aligning human knowledge with visual concepts in medical image classification models, with the goal of improving the explainability of these models.
- The method leverages human-annotated visual attributes to bridge the gap between the model's internal representations and human-interpretable concepts.
- By aligning the model's learned features with human-provided knowledge, the approach aims to enhance the transparency and trustworthiness of medical image classification systems.
Plain English Explanation
Medical image classification models, which are used to diagnose conditions from medical scans, can sometimes be "black boxes" - it's not always clear how they arrive at their predictions. This paper aims to make these models more transparent and explainable.
The key idea is to connect the model's internal representations (the patterns it learns from the images) to concepts that humans can understand. The researchers do this by having humans annotate the images with visual attributes - things like "this region looks inflamed" or "this texture is smooth."
By aligning the model's learned features with these human-provided attributes, the model becomes more transparent. When it makes a prediction, it can point to the specific visual cues in the image that led to that decision, in terms of the human-understandable attributes.
This helps build trust in the model's decisions and makes it easier for doctors and patients to understand how the model is working. It's a bit like translating the model's "internal language" into something more accessible to humans.
Technical Explanation
The core of the proposed approach is a multi-task learning framework that jointly optimizes the main medical image classification task and an auxiliary task of predicting the human-annotated visual attributes.
During training, the model is encouraged to learn features that not only discriminate well for the classification task, but also align with the human-provided attribute annotations. This creates an explicit connection between the model's internal representations and concepts that humans can interpret.
At inference time, the model's predictions can be explained by highlighting the relevant visual attributes that contributed to the output. This provides a more transparent and interpretable decision-making process compared to a standard black-box classification model.
Critical Analysis
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through experiments on two medical imaging datasets, showing improved classification performance and enhanced explainability compared to baseline models.
However, a potential limitation is the reliance on human-annotated visual attributes, which can be subjective and time-consuming to collect. The generalizability of the approach to other medical domains may also depend on the availability of such attribute annotations.
Additionally, while the explainability provided by the model is an important step forward, further research may be needed to fully understand the clinical implications and potential biases of the explanations generated by the system.
Conclusion
This paper presents a promising approach for aligning deep learning models for medical image classification with human-interpretable visual concepts. By bridging the gap between the model's internal representations and human knowledge, the proposed method enhances the explainability and trustworthiness of these critical diagnostic tools.
As AI systems become more prevalent in healthcare, developing explainable and transparent models will be crucial for their successful deployment and adoption. This research contributes to the ongoing efforts to make medical AI more understandable and accessible to doctors, patients, and the broader public.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Aligning Human Knowledge with Visual Concepts Towards Explainable Medical Image Classification
Yunhe Gao, Difei Gu, Mu Zhou, Dimitris Metaxas
Although explainability is essential in the clinical diagnosis, most deep learning models still function as black boxes without elucidating their decision-making process. In this study, we investigate the explainable model development that can mimic the decision-making process of human experts by fusing the domain knowledge of explicit diagnostic criteria. We introduce a simple yet effective framework, Explicd, towards Explainable language-informed criteria-based diagnosis. Explicd initiates its process by querying domain knowledge from either large language models (LLMs) or human experts to establish diagnostic criteria across various concept axes (e.g., color, shape, texture, or specific patterns of diseases). By leveraging a pretrained vision-language model, Explicd injects these criteria into the embedding space as knowledge anchors, thereby facilitating the learning of corresponding visual concepts within medical images. The final diagnostic outcome is determined based on the similarity scores between the encoded visual concepts and the textual criteria embeddings. Through extensive evaluation of five medical image classification benchmarks, Explicd has demonstrated its inherent explainability and extends to improve classification performance compared to traditional black-box models. Code is available at url{https://github.com/yhygao/Explicd}.
Read more9/20/2024
🤿
0
Enhancing Deep Learning Model Explainability in Brain Tumor Datasets using Post-Heuristic Approaches
Konstantinos Pasvantis, Eftychios Protopapadakis
The application of deep learning models in medical diagnosis has showcased considerable efficacy in recent years. Nevertheless, a notable limitation involves the inherent lack of explainability during decision-making processes. This study addresses such a constraint, by enhancing the interpretability robustness. The primary focus is directed towards refining the explanations generated by the LIME Library and LIME image explainer. This is achieved throuhg post-processing mechanisms, based on scenario-specific rules. Multiple experiments have been conducted using publicly accessible datasets related to brain tumor detection. Our proposed post-heuristic approach demonstrates significant advancements, yielding more robust and concrete results, in the context of medical diagnosis.
Read more5/1/2024
0
Explainable Metric Learning for Deflating Data Bias
Emma Andrews, Prabhat Mishra
Image classification is an essential part of computer vision which assigns a given input image to a specific category based on the similarity evaluation within given criteria. While promising classifiers can be obtained through deep learning models, these approaches lack explainability, where the classification results are hard to interpret in a human-understandable way. In this paper, we present an explainable metric learning framework, which constructs hierarchical levels of semantic segments of an image for better interpretability. The key methodology involves a bottom-up learning strategy, starting by training the local metric learning model for the individual segments and then combining segments to compose comprehensive metrics in a tree. Specifically, our approach enables a more human-understandable similarity measurement between two images based on the semantic segments within it, which can be utilized to generate new samples to reduce bias in a training dataset. Extensive experimental evaluation demonstrates that the proposed approach can drastically improve model accuracy compared with state-of-the-art methods.
Read more7/9/2024
0
Explainable AI improves task performance in human-AI collaboration
Julian Senoner, Simon Schallmoser, Bernhard Kratzwald, Stefan Feuerriegel, Torbj{o}rn Netland
Artificial intelligence (AI) provides considerable opportunities to assist human work. However, one crucial challenge of human-AI collaboration is that many AI algorithms operate in a black-box manner where the way how the AI makes predictions remains opaque. This makes it difficult for humans to validate a prediction made by AI against their own domain knowledge. For this reason, we hypothesize that augmenting humans with explainable AI as a decision aid improves task performance in human-AI collaboration. To test this hypothesis, we analyze the effect of augmenting domain experts with explainable AI in the form of visual heatmaps. We then compare participants that were either supported by (a) black-box AI or (b) explainable AI, where the latter supports them to follow AI predictions when the AI is accurate or overrule the AI when the AI predictions are wrong. We conducted two preregistered experiments with representative, real-world visual inspection tasks from manufacturing and medicine. The first experiment was conducted with factory workers from an electronics factory, who performed $N=9,600$ assessments of whether electronic products have defects. The second experiment was conducted with radiologists, who performed $N=5,650$ assessments of chest X-ray images to identify lung lesions. The results of our experiments with domain experts performing real-world tasks show that task performance improves when participants are supported by explainable AI instead of black-box AI. For example, in the manufacturing setting, we find that augmenting participants with explainable AI (as opposed to black-box AI) leads to a five-fold decrease in the median error rate of human decisions, which gives a significant improvement in task performance.
Read more6/13/2024