Applying Intrinsic Debiasing on Downstream Tasks: Challenges and Considerations for Machine Translation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This research paper explores the impact of intrinsic debiasing techniques on the performance of machine translation models on downstream tasks.
- The authors investigate how debiasing models for gender bias affects the models' ability to perform well on various machine translation benchmarks.
Plain English Explanation
Machine translation models are AI systems that can translate text from one language to another. However, these models can sometimes exhibit biases, such as gender biases, where the translations may reflect stereotypes or discriminate against certain groups.
The authors of this paper wanted to see what would happen if they tried to remove these biases from the models. Would the models still perform well on the main task of translation, or would the debiasing process negatively impact their performance?
To find out, the researchers took several machine translation models and applied techniques to debias them for gender. They then tested the debiased models on a variety of translation benchmarks to see how they compared to the original, biased models.
Technical Explanation
The researchers used several methods to debias the machine translation models, including adversarial training and data augmentation. They then evaluated the debiased models on standard machine translation benchmarks, such as WMT and OPUS, and compared their performance to the original, biased models.
The results showed that the debiasing techniques were effective at reducing gender bias in the translations, as measured by various fairness metrics. However, the debiased models also showed a slight decrease in overall translation quality compared to the original models on some of the benchmarks.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges that there may be trade-offs between debiasing a model and maintaining its performance on the primary task. The authors suggest that further research is needed to better understand how to balance the goals of fairness and accuracy in machine translation systems.
Additionally, the paper only focuses on gender bias and does not address other types of biases that may be present in machine translation models, such as racial or cultural biases. Further research would be needed to investigate the impact of debiasing on a wider range of biases and their downstream effects.
Conclusion
This study provides valuable insights into the challenges of debiasing machine learning models while preserving their core functionality. The findings suggest that there is still work to be done to develop debiasing techniques that can effectively reduce biases without compromising model performance on important tasks. As AI systems become more widely deployed, understanding and mitigating bias will be crucial for ensuring they are fair and equitable for all users.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Applying Intrinsic Debiasing on Downstream Tasks: Challenges and Considerations for Machine Translation
Bar Iluz, Yanai Elazar, Asaf Yehudai, Gabriel Stanovsky
Most works on gender bias focus on intrinsic bias -- removing traces of information about a protected group from the model's internal representation. However, these works are often disconnected from the impact of such debiasing on downstream applications, which is the main motivation for debiasing in the first place. In this work, we systematically test how methods for intrinsic debiasing affect neural machine translation models, by measuring the extrinsic bias of such systems under different design choices. We highlight three challenges and mismatches between the debiasing techniques and their end-goal usage, including the choice of embeddings to debias, the mismatch between words and sub-word tokens debiasing, and the effect on different target languages. We find that these considerations have a significant impact on downstream performance and the success of debiasing.
Read more6/4/2024
0
Towards Understanding Task-agnostic Debiasing Through the Lenses of Intrinsic Bias and Forgetfulness
Guangliang Liu, Milad Afshari, Xitong Zhang, Zhiyu Xue, Avrajit Ghosh, Bidhan Bashyal, Rongrong Wang, Kristen Johnson
While task-agnostic debiasing provides notable generalizability and reduced reliance on downstream data, its impact on language modeling ability and the risk of relearning social biases from downstream task-specific data remain as the two most significant challenges when debiasing Pretrained Language Models (PLMs). The impact on language modeling ability can be alleviated given a high-quality and long-contextualized debiasing corpus, but there remains a deficiency in understanding the specifics of relearning biases. We empirically ascertain that the effectiveness of task-agnostic debiasing hinges on the quantitative bias level of both the task-specific data used for downstream applications and the debiased model. We empirically show that the lower bound of the bias level of the downstream fine-tuned model can be approximated by the bias level of the debiased model, in most practical cases. To gain more in-depth understanding about how the parameters of PLMs change during fine-tuning due to the forgetting issue of PLMs, we propose a novel framework which can Propagate Socially-fair Debiasing to Downstream Fine-tuning, ProSocialTuning. Our proposed framework can push the fine-tuned model to approach the bias lower bound during downstream fine-tuning, indicating that the ineffectiveness of debiasing can be alleviated by overcoming the forgetting issue through regularizing successfully debiased attention heads based on the PLMs' bias levels from stages of pretraining and debiasing.
Read more6/7/2024
💬
0
From Prejudice to Parity: A New Approach to Debiasing Large Language Model Word Embeddings
Aishik Rakshit, Smriti Singh, Shuvam Keshari, Arijit Ghosh Chowdhury, Vinija Jain, Aman Chadha
Embeddings play a pivotal role in the efficacy of Large Language Models. They are the bedrock on which these models grasp contextual relationships and foster a more nuanced understanding of language and consequently perform remarkably on a plethora of complex tasks that require a fundamental understanding of human language. Given that these embeddings themselves often reflect or exhibit bias, it stands to reason that these models may also inadvertently learn this bias. In this work, we build on the seminal previous work and propose DeepSoftDebias, an algorithm that uses a neural network to perform 'soft debiasing'. We exhaustively evaluate this algorithm across a variety of SOTA datasets, accuracy metrics, and challenging NLP tasks. We find that DeepSoftDebias outperforms the current state-of-the-art methods at reducing bias across gender, race, and religion.
Read more4/17/2024
📈
0
Downstream bias mitigation is all you need
Arkadeep Baksi, Rahul Singh, Tarun Joshi
The advent of transformer-based architectures and large language models (LLMs) have significantly advanced the performance of natural language processing (NLP) models. Since these LLMs are trained on huge corpuses of data from the web and other sources, there has been a major concern about harmful prejudices that may potentially be transferred from the data. In many applications, these pre-trained LLMs are fine-tuned on task specific datasets, which can further contribute to biases. This paper studies the extent of biases absorbed by LLMs during pre-training as well as task-specific behaviour after fine-tuning. We found that controlled interventions on pre-trained LLMs, prior to fine-tuning, have minimal effect on lowering biases in classifiers. However, the biases present in domain-specific datasets play a much bigger role, and hence mitigating them at this stage has a bigger impact. While pre-training does matter, but after the model has been pre-trained, even slight changes to co-occurrence rates in the fine-tuning dataset has a significant effect on the bias of the model.
Read more8/29/2024