Are Your Models Still Fair? Fairness Attacks on Graph Neural Networks via Node Injections

Read original: arXiv:2406.03052 - Published 6/6/2024 by Zihan Luo, Hong Huang, Yongkang Zhou, Jiping Zhang, Nuo Chen
Total Score

0

Are Your Models Still Fair? Fairness Attacks on Graph Neural Networks via Node Injections

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper investigates the fairness of graph neural networks (GNNs) and proposes a method to attack their fairness through node injections.
  • GNNs are a type of machine learning model that can learn from graph-structured data, such as social networks or recommendation systems.
  • Fairness in AI systems is an important concern, as these models can perpetuate or amplify societal biases if not designed carefully.

Plain English Explanation

Graph neural networks (GNNs) are a powerful type of machine learning model that can analyze and make predictions based on data organized in the form of a graph, such as a social network or a product recommendation system. These models have shown great success in a variety of applications, but there is growing concern about their potential to be biased or unfair.

The researchers in this paper wanted to explore how GNNs can be made more fair and resilient to unfairness. They developed a technique called a "fairness attack" that can deliberately introduce biases into a GNN model by injecting carefully crafted nodes into the input graph. This allows them to test the model's vulnerability to unfairness and understand how it might behave in real-world scenarios where data can be noisy or manipulated.

By understanding the weaknesses of GNNs when it comes to fairness, the researchers hope to spur the development of more robust and equitable AI systems that can better serve all members of society, regardless of their background or characteristics. This work builds on previous research on fairness in GNNs and techniques for ensuring fairness through regularization.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a novel "fairness attack" method that can be used to evaluate the robustness of graph neural networks (GNNs) to fairness violations. The key idea is to inject carefully crafted "attack" nodes into the input graph, which can then influence the model's predictions and expose its vulnerability to unfairness.

The researchers first define a formalization of fairness for GNNs, based on the concept of group and individual fairness. They then develop an optimization-based approach to generate attack nodes that can maximize unfairness, while constraining the attack to be semantically meaningful and avoiding detection.

The attack is evaluated on several real-world datasets and GNN models, including techniques that aim to improve fairness through regularization and federated learning approaches. The results show that the proposed fairness attack can significantly degrade the fairness of these models, even when they employ fairness-enhancing techniques.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes an important contribution by highlighting the potential vulnerabilities of GNNs to fairness violations, even in the face of existing fairness-enhancing techniques. The proposed fairness attack provides a valuable tool for evaluating the robustness of GNN models and can help spur the development of more resilient and equitable AI systems.

However, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research. For example, the attack assumes the attacker has full knowledge of the target model, which may not always be the case in real-world scenarios. Additionally, the paper focuses on a specific fairness metric and does not explore the trade-offs between different fairness objectives, an area that other research has begun to investigate.

Future work could also explore the interplay between fairness and other desirable properties of GNNs, such as model robustness to adversarial attacks or the ability to preserve user privacy. Ultimately, ensuring the fairness and trustworthiness of AI systems in complex, real-world settings remains a significant challenge that will require continued research and collaboration across disciplines.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel fairness attack method that can be used to evaluate the robustness of graph neural networks (GNNs) to unfairness. By injecting carefully crafted nodes into the input graph, the attack can degrade the fairness of GNN models, even those that employ fairness-enhancing techniques.

The findings of this research highlight the importance of developing GNN models that are not only accurate, but also fair and resilient to potential biases. As GNNs become increasingly prevalent in real-world applications, such as social networks and recommendation systems, ensuring their fairness and trustworthiness will be crucial for promoting equitable and inclusive AI-powered services.

The insights and tools provided in this paper can help drive further research and innovation in the field of fair and robust machine learning, ultimately leading to the development of AI systems that better serve the needs of all members of society.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Are Your Models Still Fair? Fairness Attacks on Graph Neural Networks via Node Injections
Total Score

0

Are Your Models Still Fair? Fairness Attacks on Graph Neural Networks via Node Injections

Zihan Luo, Hong Huang, Yongkang Zhou, Jiping Zhang, Nuo Chen

Despite the remarkable capabilities demonstrated by Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) in graph-related tasks, recent research has revealed the fairness vulnerabilities in GNNs when facing malicious adversarial attacks. However, all existing fairness attacks require manipulating the connectivity between existing nodes, which may be prohibited in reality. To this end, we introduce a Node Injection-based Fairness Attack (NIFA), exploring the vulnerabilities of GNN fairness in such a more realistic setting. In detail, NIFA first designs two insightful principles for node injection operations, namely the uncertainty-maximization principle and homophily-increase principle, and then optimizes injected nodes' feature matrix to further ensure the effectiveness of fairness attacks. Comprehensive experiments on three real-world datasets consistently demonstrate that NIFA can significantly undermine the fairness of mainstream GNNs, even including fairness-aware GNNs, by injecting merely 1% of nodes. We sincerely hope that our work can stimulate increasing attention from researchers on the vulnerability of GNN fairness, and encourage the development of corresponding defense mechanisms.

Read more

6/6/2024

Rethinking Fair Graph Neural Networks from Re-balancing
Total Score

0

Rethinking Fair Graph Neural Networks from Re-balancing

Zhixun Li, Yushun Dong, Qiang Liu, Jeffrey Xu Yu

Driven by the powerful representation ability of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), plentiful GNN models have been widely deployed in many real-world applications. Nevertheless, due to distribution disparities between different demographic groups, fairness in high-stake decision-making systems is receiving increasing attention. Although lots of recent works devoted to improving the fairness of GNNs and achieved considerable success, they all require significant architectural changes or additional loss functions requiring more hyper-parameter tuning. Surprisingly, we find that simple re-balancing methods can easily match or surpass existing fair GNN methods. We claim that the imbalance across different demographic groups is a significant source of unfairness, resulting in imbalanced contributions from each group to the parameters updating. However, these simple re-balancing methods have their own shortcomings during training. In this paper, we propose FairGB, Fair Graph Neural Network via re-Balancing, which mitigates the unfairness of GNNs by group balancing. Technically, FairGB consists of two modules: counterfactual node mixup and contribution alignment loss. Firstly, we select counterfactual pairs across inter-domain and inter-class, and interpolate the ego-networks to generate new samples. Guided by analysis, we can reveal the debiasing mechanism of our model by the causal view and prove that our strategy can make sensitive attributes statistically independent from target labels. Secondly, we reweigh the contribution of each group according to gradients. By combining these two modules, they can mutually promote each other. Experimental results on benchmark datasets show that our method can achieve state-of-the-art results concerning both utility and fairness metrics. Code is available at https://github.com/ZhixunLEE/FairGB.

Read more

7/17/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Fair Graph Neural Network with Supervised Contrastive Regularization

Mahdi Tavassoli Kejani (UT3), Fadi Dornaika (IMT), Jean-Michel Loubes (IMT)

In recent years, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have made significant advancements, particularly in tasks such as node classification, link prediction, and graph representation. However, challenges arise from biases that can be hidden not only in the node attributes but also in the connections between entities. Therefore, ensuring fairness in graph neural network learning has become a critical problem. To address this issue, we propose a novel model for training fairness-aware GNN, which enhances the Counterfactual Augmented Fair Graph Neural Network Framework (CAF). Our approach integrates Supervised Contrastive Loss and Environmental Loss to enhance both accuracy and fairness. Experimental validation on three real datasets demonstrates the superiority of our proposed model over CAF and several other existing graph-based learning methods.

Read more

4/10/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Bridging the Fairness Divide: Achieving Group and Individual Fairness in Graph Neural Networks

Duna Zhan, Dongliang Guo, Pengsheng Ji, Sheng Li

Graph neural networks (GNNs) have emerged as a powerful tool for analyzing and learning from complex data structured as graphs, demonstrating remarkable effectiveness in various applications, such as social network analysis, recommendation systems, and drug discovery. However, despite their impressive performance, the fairness problem has increasingly gained attention as a crucial aspect to consider. Existing research in graph learning focuses on either group fairness or individual fairness. However, since each concept provides unique insights into fairness from distinct perspectives, integrating them into a fair graph neural network system is crucial. To the best of our knowledge, no study has yet to comprehensively tackle both individual and group fairness simultaneously. In this paper, we propose a new concept of individual fairness within groups and a novel framework named Fairness for Group and Individual (FairGI), which considers both group fairness and individual fairness within groups in the context of graph learning. FairGI employs the similarity matrix of individuals to achieve individual fairness within groups, while leveraging adversarial learning to address group fairness in terms of both Equal Opportunity and Statistical Parity. The experimental results demonstrate that our approach not only outperforms other state-of-the-art models in terms of group fairness and individual fairness within groups, but also exhibits excellent performance in population-level individual fairness, while maintaining comparable prediction accuracy.

Read more

4/29/2024