Generating Uncontextualized and Contextualized Questions for Document-Level Event Argument Extraction

Overview

• The paper focuses on generating uncontextualized and contextualized questions to aid in document-level event argument extraction.
• Event argument extraction is the task of identifying the key participants (e.g., agents, patients) in an event described in a document.
• The authors explore how automatically generated questions can help improve the performance of event argument extraction models.

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores a novel approach to enhance document-level event argument extraction, which is the process of identifying the key players involved in an event described in a document. The authors propose generating two types of questions - uncontextualized and contextualized - and using them to improve the performance of event argument extraction models.

Uncontextualized questions are general questions about the document, such as "Who was involved in the event?" Contextualized questions, on the other hand, are more specific and tailored to the particular details of the document, such as "What was the role of [named entity] in the event?"

The intuition is that by asking these types of questions and using the answers to train the event argument extraction models, the models will be better able to identify the key participants in the described events. This is because the questions help the models focus on the relevant information in the document and learn the connections between events and their arguments.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through experiments on several event extraction datasets, showing improvements over existing methods. This work highlights the value of leveraging question generation to enhance document understanding tasks like event argument extraction.

Technical Explanation

The authors propose a framework for generating both uncontextualized and contextualized questions to aid in document-level event argument extraction. Uncontextualized questions are generated based on the overall document content, while contextualized questions are tailored to the specific details of each event in the document.

The uncontextualized question generation module uses a pre-trained language model to generate general questions about the document, such as "Who was involved in the event?" The contextualized question generation module first identifies the event triggers (words that indicate the occurrence of an event) in the document, and then generates questions specific to each event, such as "What was the role of [named entity] in the [event]?"

The authors then incorporate these generated questions into the training of the event argument extraction model. The model is trained not only on the document text and event annotations, but also on the generated questions and their answers. This multi-task learning approach helps the model better understand the relationships between events and their arguments.

The authors evaluate their framework on several event extraction datasets, including ACE 2005 and RAMS, and demonstrate significant improvements over existing state-of-the-art methods. The results suggest that the generated questions, both uncontextualized and contextualized, are effective in guiding the event argument extraction model to better capture the relevant information in the documents.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach to enhancing document-level event argument extraction through the use of automatically generated questions. The authors' intuition that questions can help the extraction models focus on the relevant information and learn the connections between events and their arguments is well-supported by the experimental results.

One potential limitation of the work is the reliance on pre-trained language models for the question generation modules. While this allows the framework to leverage powerful language understanding capabilities, it also means the performance of the question generation is dependent on the quality and robustness of the pre-trained models. The authors could explore alternative question generation approaches, such as reinforcement learning-based methods, to further improve the quality and relevance of the generated questions.

Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential biases or inconsistencies that may arise in the generated questions, and how these could impact the training and performance of the event argument extraction model. Further investigation into the quality and diversity of the generated questions would be a valuable direction for future research.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach to enhancing document-level event argument extraction by generating both uncontextualized and contextualized questions and incorporating them into the training of the extraction model. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their framework through experiments on several datasets, showing significant improvements over existing methods.

The work highlights the potential of leveraging question generation to better understand the relationships between events and their arguments in large documents. This approach could have broader implications for other document-level understanding tasks, such as within-document event coreference resolution and open-domain question answering.

Overall, this research represents an important step forward in the field of document-level event understanding, and further exploration of the interplay between question generation and extraction models could lead to even more powerful and robust systems for this task.